Delhi Orders Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Raj Sharma & Anr vs Santosh Rani
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHICM APPL. 28914/2026 IN + RFA 1060/2019 RAJ SHARMA & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Ms. Renu Gupta, Advocate along for appellant no.1 with appellant no.1 in Ms. Pratiksha Jalan, Advocate for appellant no.2 with appellant no.2 inversusSANTOSH RANI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vivek Kumar Tandon, Ms. Laxmi Gupta and Ms. Pooja Giri, Advocates along with respondent inCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 30.04.2026 CM APPL. 28914/2026 (for withdrawal of RFA 1060/2019)1. The present application has been filed on behalf of the appellantsunder Order XXIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) seeking to withdraw the present appeal in view of the fact that the parties have settled their disputes amicably.2. Mr. Vivek Kumar Tandon, counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent does not oppose the same. RFA 1060/2019 Page 1 of 23. For the reasons stated the application is allowed. RFA 1060/20194. In view of the order passe...
Sangeeta vs Solomon David & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 1433/2024 SANGEETA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S. C. Sagar, Mr. Shishu Pal Sharma and Ms. Swati, Advs.versusSOLOMON DAVID & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gaurav Dhingra and Mr. Shashank Singh, Advs. for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 30.04.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition inasmuch as the necessary compliance has been done by the respondents.2. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. SACHIN DATTA, J APRIL 30, 2026/clThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2026 at 11:52:13...
Urmil Gupta Through Spa Holder Shri Ashok Kumar Gupta vs Sushil Prakas ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 695/2024, CM APPL. 59049/2024, CM APPL. 59052/2024, CM APPL. 67228/2024, CM APPL. 29939/2025 URMIL GUPTA THROUGH SPA HOLDER SHRI ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA .....Appellant Through: Appearance not given.versusSUSHIL PRAKASH GUPTA .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 30.04.20261. Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that matter has beenamicably settled between the parties in terms of Settlement Agreement dated 17.09.2025 through Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, Delhi High Court, New Delhi.2. Copy of the same is taken on record.3. In terms of Settlement Agreement dated 17.09.2025 between the parties, present Appeal along with pending Applications is disposed of.NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.APRIL 30, 2026/R This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is down...
Robin Dagar vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 15197/2025, CM APPL. 62303/2025 & CM APPL. ROBIN DAGAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Yashpal Singh, Advocate (through VC)versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vinod Kumar Khanna and Mr. Naveen Chopra, Advocates for R-1. Mr. P.S. Singh, Ms. Annu Singh and Ms. Shivangi Sharma, Advocates for R-2. Mr. Akshay, S.I. Mr. Dhananjay Sehrawat, Advocate for R-3 and R-4.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 30.04.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to theMunicipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) to take action for sealing and demolition of the illegal construction at Khasra No. 1031 and 1032, Mahipalpur, New Delhi-110037 (subject premises).2. A status report has been handed over in Court on behalf of respondent/MCD. 2.1 The same is taken on record. W.P.(C) 15197/2025 Page 1 of 23. In terms of the said status report, it is stated that demolition actionwas carried o...
Komal Gola vs Rishabh Kumar
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ TR.P.(C.) 188/2025 KOMAL GOLA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aman Sisodia, Advocate.versusRISHABH KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Advocate (through vc).CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 30.04.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition under Section 24 of the CPC seeks the followingprayers: a) Transfer the case bearing HMA. No. 1925/2024, titled as Rishabh Kumar V/s Komal Gola, pending in the Court of Sh. Naveen Kumar Kashyap, Judge, Family Court-02, Central, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi to the competent court of . Judge, Family Court, South East, Saket Courts, New Delhi. b) Pass any other or further order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, in the interest of justice.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition on account of the fact that compromise has been arrived at between the parties.4. Leave granted.5. The present p...
B a Tata vs Punya Salila Srivastav & Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 281/2018 B A TATA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhanshu Prakash, Adv. through Vc.versusPUNYA SALILA SRIVASTAV & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anubhav Gupta, Panel counsel for GNCTD with Mr. Kartik Sharma, Adv. for R-1, 2 and 4. Mr. Pranay, Adv. for Ms. Mrinalini Sen, SC for DDA.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 30.04.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt ofCourts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India, 1950 seeks the following prayers: - a) Hold the Respondent Nos.2, 3 and 4 /Alleged Contemnors guilty of contempt under Section 2 (b) and 12 of the Contempt of Courts of Act, 1971 as well as under Article 215 of the Constitution of India and punish accordingly for willful disobedience and defiance of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 06.09.2017 rendered in Writ Petition (C) No. 7773/2017; and...
Pankaj Kumar Daga vs Additional Commissioner of Customs (Warehouse)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 18337/2025 PANKAJ KUMAR DAGA .....Petitioner Through: Mr Dushyant K Mahant, Adv.versusADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (WAREHOUSE) .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 30.04.20261. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner that the retained articles/goods have been released, we deem it appropriate to dispose of the present petition.2. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of as being rendered infructuous. NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J AJAY DIGPAUL, J APRIL 30, 2026/sky/This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2026 at 12:59:18...
Renu vs State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
$~1 & 2* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4291/2025 RENU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sarthak Tomar, Advocate.versusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP with Mr. Abhimanyu Arya, Advocate. ASI Chander Pal, Narcotics Squad. + BAIL APPLN. 4326/2025 SHIVAM ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sarthak Tomar, Advocate.versusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP with Mr. Abhimanyu Arya, Advocate. ASI Chander Pal, Narcotics Squad.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.04.20261. The applicants, who are husband and wife, have filed the presentapplications for anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 530/2025 dated 11.10.2025, registered at Police Station Mahender Park, District North-West, Delhi, under Sections 21 and 25 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [the NDPS Act].2. I have heard Mr. Sarthak Tomar, learned counsel for the applicants, and Ms. M...
Jpg Builders Private Limited vs Djt Retailers Private Limited
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 27/2026 JPG BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjiv Swaroop, Advocate. (M): 9716643101 Email: [email protected] RETAILERS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Abhishek E. Kisku with Mr. J. Shivam Kumar, Advocates. (M): 9783678914 Email: [email protected]:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNAORDER% 30.04.20261. Conciliated Agreement dated 29th April, 2026 has been received from the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, as per which, the parties have settled their disputes amicably.2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in view of the settlement of the disputes, he does not wish to press the present petition.3. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. MINI PUSHKARNA, J APRIL 30, 2026/cThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code sh...
Sanjida Khatoon vs Municipal Coropration of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 65/2025 & CM APPL. 191/2025 SANJIDA KHATOON .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Renu, Ms. Kavita and Mr. Piyush Kumar Singh, AdvocatesversusMUNICIPAL COROPRATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Standing Counsel for MCD with Ms. Sneha Roy, Ms. Madhu Yadav & Ms. Gurleen Kaur Sran, Advocates. Ms. Ayushi Jain, Advocate for R-5 (Through video-conferencing)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 30.04.20261. The present writ petition has been filed alleging that the respondent-MCD has wrongfully demolished the bathroom attached to the jhuggi, without following the principles of natural justice. Further, compensation is also sought for the damages caused on account of the demolition.2. Earlier, a writ petition was filed on behalf of the private respondentno.5, being W.P. (C) 14347/2024, titled Jamuna v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors., complaining against the unauthorised construction ...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »