Delhi Orders Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Shreeji Polyfab Private Limited vs M/S Goldstone International
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 110/2025M/S SHREEJI POLYFAB PRIVATE LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Naresh Gupta, Adv.versusM/S GOLDSTONE INTERNATIONAL .....Defendant Through: Mr. Rishabh Kapur and Mr. Tanmay Gupta, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 30.03.2026CS(COMM) 110/2025I.A. 8497/2026 (by plaintiff under Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC)1. The present application has been filed by the plaintiff seekingwithdrawal of the suit in terms of settlement arrived at between the parties.2. Mr. Naresh Gupta, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiffsubmits that during pendency of the present proceedings, the parties were referred to mediation where they have arrived at a settlement, terms whereof have been recorded in the Settlement Agreement dated 19.03.2026. A copy of the said agreement has been filed along with the present application.3. He submits that in terms of the said settlement, the plaintiff has towithdraw the...
Ashu Pal vs State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 685/2025 ASHU PAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Suraj Prakash Sharma, Advocate (through videoconferencing).versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with Inspector S. P. Samariya, PS Prem Nagar.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 30.03.20261. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 519/2019 ofPolice Station Prem Nagar for offence under Section 302/201/34 of IPC. 1.1. This bail application came up for the first hearing on 17.02.2025 before the predecessor bench and thereafter continued getting adjourned before different benches. Along with 179 such old pending bail applications, this application also was transferred to this bench. 1.2 Today is the first hearing before me.2. Broadly speaking, the prosecution case is that on 22.09.2019, theaccused/applicant himself visited the police station and informed that he had killed his wife and ch...
Deep Narayan Saraswat vs State of Nct of Delhi and Another & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 751/2026 & CRL.M.A. 7179/2026 DEEP NARAYAN SARASWAT .....Petitioner Through: Sh.Deepak Maharaj, Ms. Premlata, Sh.Nikhil Maharaj, Sh.Sunil Mehra, Advs. Petitioner in person.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Ms.Priyam Agarwal, Mr.Abhinav Kr. Arya, Mr.Aryan Sachdeva, Advs. Insp.Satvinder, ASI Sunil, PS- Mohan Garden. Ms.Akansha Batra, in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAORDER% 30.03.20261. The present Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India, read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking issuance of a Writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents to produce before this Court the wife of the petitioner, namely, Ms. Akansha Batra.2. Ms. Akansha Batra has appeared before us in person. Shesubmits that t...
Rohit Kumar vs the State Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 756/2026 ROHIT KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Yashvi Garg, Ms. Alka Pruthi, Mr. Ashu Kumar, Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Mr. Shivam, Mr. Manmohan Jha, Mr. Kawalpreet Singh, Mr. Dinesh Kumar Madesiya, Mr. Jai Subhash Thakur, Advs.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr.Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Ms.Priyam Agarwal, Mr.Abhinav Kr. Arya, Mr.Aryan Sachdeva, Advs. SI Ram Singh, SI Lal Chand, PS-SB Diary. Ms.Priyanka, in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAORDER% 30.03.20261. The present Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking issuance of a Writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondent to produce the sister of the petitioner, namely, Ms. Priyanka before this Court.2. Ms. Priyanka has appeared in person before this...
Biswajit Ghosh vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 392/2026 BISWAJIT GHOSH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mandeep Baisala, Mr. Atal Singh, Mr. Kavesh Bidhuri, Mr. Shobhit Anand, Mr. Sourabh Soni, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Abhishek Maratha, SPC, Mr. Sanjay Pal, GP and Ms. Nupur Sharma, Adv. SI Atul Sen, CISF, SI Kumar Gaurav, CISF, Inspector Sanjay Kumar, CISF and CT Rahul Singh, CISF.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 30.03.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the presentpetition inasmuch as the necessary appointment has been made.2. The petition is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.SACHIN DATTA, JMARCH 30, 2026/clThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 10:17:11...
Surya Food and Agro Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax Ci ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
$~43 & 44* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3927/2026, CM APPL. 19208/2026 & CM APPL. 19209/2026 + W.P.(C) 3930/2026, CM APPL. 19216/2026 & CM APPL. 19217/2026 SURYA FOOD AND AGRO LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manuj Sabharwal, Mr. Drona Negi, Mr. Devvrat Tiwari and Mr. Manish Kumar, Advs.versusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE 22(2),DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, SSC.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 30.03.20261. By way of present writ petitions, the petitioner has challenged theorder dated 05.03.2026 passed by the respondent no.1 under Section 154 ofthe Income Tax Act, 1961.2. After arguing for some time, Mr. Manuj Sabharwal, learned counselfor the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petitions.3. Permission granted.4. The writ petitions alongwith all pending applications are dismissed aswithdrawn.DINESH M...
Sita Ram vs State
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.A. 695/2004 SITA RAM .....Appellant Through: Mr. Balram Singh, Advocate with Appellant-in-person.versusSTATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Atul Guleria, SPP, CBI with Mr. Aryan Rakesh, Adv.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAVORDER% 30.03.20261. Hybrid mode.2. Learned counsel for the Appellant, on instructions from the Appellantstated that the Appellant does not want to continue with the appeal as he has already completed the sentence awarded to him and for that matter, fine was paid.6. This fact stands verified from the Nominal Roll dated 20.03.2026.3. In such circumstances, the appeal has become infructuous and standsdisposed of.VIMAL KUMAR YADAV, JMARCH 30, 2026/akcThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/04/2026 at 11:18:34...
Parsvnath Developers Limited vs Mrs Arvinder Sethi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 656/2026, CM APPL. 19638/2026 & CM APPL. 19639/2026 PARSVNATH DEVELOPERS LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Joneja and Mr. Anmol Kumar, Advocates.versusMRS ARVINDER SETHI .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 30.03.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave towithdraw the present petition, with liberty to approach the appropriate forum.3. Accordingly, in view of the submission made by learned counsel forthe petitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as sought in accordance with law. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, JMARCH 30, 2026/nd/abkThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above...
Anju Kapur vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ LPA 168/2026 ANJU KAPUR .....AppellantThrough: Mr. Piyush Kalra, Mr. Vijay Nair, Mr. Saqib M and Ms. Aishwarya Jain, Advs.VersusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR.....RespondentsThrough: Mr. Harshit Chopra, SC, MCD with Ms. Swati Tiwari and Mr. Khushal Chand Agarwal, Advs. for R-1.CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 30.03.2026CM Nos.19624/2026 & 19625/20261. Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The applications stand disposed of.LPA 168/20263. Heard learned counsel for the parties.4. This intra-Court appeal seeks to challenge the order dated 11.03.2026,passed by the learned Single Judge whereby W.P.(C) No. 3149/2026 which was instituted by the appellant has been dismissed on the ground that the show cause notice in respect of the subject construction was issued on 10.07.2024 and demolition order was passed on 05.09.2024, however, despite availa...
Brind Kesri @ Bind Kesari @ Raja Singh vs State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2305/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9417/2026 BRIND KESRI @ BIND KESARI @ RAJA SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Counsel for the petitioner (appearance not given)versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for the State with SI AmitCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 30.03.20261. The petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No. 1325/2014 of PoliceStation S.P. Badli for offence under Section 336/506 IPC read with Section 24.03.2026 executed between the petitioner and the respondent no. 2.2. Broadly speaking, the allegation against the petitioner is that he isinvolved in various cases and was even sent to jail for some time; and that on the date of the alleged incident, when he went to parental home of his wife (complainant de facto) to fetch her back, but she refused to return, he threatened to kill her; and that after few days, he again visited parental home of the complaina...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »