Delhi Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Teerthankar Mahaveer University vs Harmeet Singh and Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 25thFebruary, 2026 + CM(M) 437/2026, CM APPL. 12914/2026 &CM APPL. 12915/2026 TEERTHANKAR MAHAVEER UNIVERSITY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Annirudh Sharma and Mr. Ankit Swami, Advs.versusHARMEET SINGH AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jai Sahai Endlaw and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER (Oral)Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J.1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227of the Constitution of India, 1950 assailing the order dated 15th July, 2025 passed by the learned Trial Court in Civil Suit No. 490/2021, whereby the evidence of the petitioner/defendant has been closed.3. Learned counsel for the respondents appears on advance notice andaccepts notice.4. The matter is taken up for hearing with the consent of the learnedcounsel for the parties.5. Heard. Record perused.6. Le...
Karun Saini & Ors. vs State Goverment of Nct of Delhi Through Sho Pand ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1558/2026 KARUN SAINI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Ragini Tripathi and Mr. B.K. Agarwal, Advocates alongwith petitioners in personversusSTATE GOVERMENT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGHSHO PANDAV NAGAR DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for the State with SI Aashish Tushir, P.S. Pandav Nagar R-2 in personCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 25.02.20261. By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIRbearing no. 591/2021, registered at Police Station Pandav Nagar, Delhi, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC).2. Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State.3. The petitioners and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court inperson and have been identified by their counsels and concerned Investigating Officer (IO) from Police Station ...
Smt Resham Kaur @ Resham and Ors vs the State of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1542/2026, CRL.M.A. 6243/2026 SMT RESHAM KAUR @ RESHAM AND ORS .....PetitionersThrough: Mr. Anis Mohammad, Advocate alongwith petitioners.versusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....RespondentsThrough: Mr. Hemant Mahela, APP for State. Insp. Satbir Singh, P.S. Jaitpur.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 25.02.2026 By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 0054/2023 dated 16.01.2023 registered under sections 323/354/448/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) at P.S.: Jait Pur, South-East Delhi. Consequent upon completion of investigation, offence under section 354-B of the IPC have also been added vid chargesheet filed in the matter.2. The court is informed that a cross-FIR filed by the respondents hasalready been quashed by a Co-ordinate Bench vid order dated 16.05.2025 passed in CRL.M...
Master Dixit Ankalagi Through His Father Sh. Basappa Ankalagi vs Sh. A ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 327/2026MASTER DIXIT ANKALAGI THROUGH HIS FATHER SH.BASAPPA ANKALAGI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kumar Utkarsh and Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advs.versusSH. ASHOK KUMAR SINGH, IAS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shlok Chandra, Mr. Parikshit Singh Bhati and Ms. Lolita D. Crasta, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 24.04.2026 CM APPL.27162/2026 (for directions)1. Issue notice.2. Learned counsel, as aforesaid, accepts notice on behalf of respondent.He seeks some time to take instructions.3. List on 26.05.2026.SACHIN DATTA, JAPRIL 24, 2026/clThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/04/2026 at 11:31:33...
Munni vs Lt. Governor and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 667/2026 MUNNI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Prakash Khandelwal, Advocate.versusLT. GOVERNOR AND ORS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shiven Verma, Advocate for R- 1 and R-2 (Through VC) Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC with Mr. Abhijeet Kumar and Ms. Amisha Gupta, Advocates and SI Gunjan Singh, PS-SeelampurCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 25.02.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Article 226 of theConstitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioner seeks issuance of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ direction the respondent no.1 to consider the request of the petitioner and issue sanction for prosecution of respondent no.32. Learned ASC, at the outset, submits that proceedings based on thecomplaint made by the petitioner are still pending and the Delhi Police officials are taking appropriate action (s) in accordan...
Mrs. Shila Devi vs the State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P. (CRL) 681/2026 MRS. SHILA DEVI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M Hasibuddin, Ms. Gracey Sachdeva and Mr. Ayush Singh, Advocates.versusTHE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao (Standing Counsel) (Criminal) with Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advocate with Insp. Rakesh Kumar (through VC), PS-Neb Sarai.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAORDER% 25.02.20261. This petition has been filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking directions in the nature of Habeas Corpus for the production of Mr. Chandr Pal, the husband of the petitioner.2. It is alleged that Mr. Chandr Pal was taken away by the Policeon 24th February, 2026 at 04:00 PM without giving any reasons and under the garb of inquiring into the missing of the only son of the petitioner, who is aged about 18 years and 6 mont...
Punj Lloyd Ltd vs Indian Oil Corporation Ltd
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 196/2026 & I.A. 5200/2026 PUNJ LLOYD LTD .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sabah Iqbal Siddiqui & Mr. Abhijit Ghosh, Advs.versusINDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit, Mr. Abhishek, Mr. Abimash Agarwal & Mr. Kartikya Tripathi, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 25.02.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration &Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to theprayer made.3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of theproceedings is extended by one year.4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, JFEBRUARY 25, 2026/JKThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code ...
Yash Kumar and Ors. vs State of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1553/2026 YASH KUMAR AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Anubhav Agrawal, Advocate alongwith petitioners in personversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State R-2 in personCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 25.02.20261. By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of theFIR bearing No. 192/2025, registered at Police Station Uttam Nagar, Delhi, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 137(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhia, 2023 (hereafter BNS') and all proceedings emanating therefrom.2. Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State.3. The petitioners and respondent nos. 2 and 3 are present before thisCourt and have been identified by their counsel and Investigating Officer(IO) concerned from Police Station Uttam Nagar, Delhi.4. Brief facts of the case are th...
Mohd. Imran @ Imran Khan vs Ms. Saba Khan
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P. 80/2019 MOHD. IMRAN @ IMRAN KHAN .....Petitioner Through: NoneversusMS. SABA KHAN .....Respondent Through: Ms. Noor Alam, AdvocateCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 25.02.20261. Since there is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner and samewas the position on 29.10.2025 as well, it seems that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present case.2. As such, the present petition is dismissed in default for non-appearance and non-prosecution.SAURABH BANERJEE, JFEBRUARY 25, 2026/SoThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/02/2026 at 12:31:16...
Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd vs Rakesh Kumar & Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ MAC.APP. 219/2019 & CM APPL. 6071/2019 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD .....Appellant Through: None.versusRAKESH KUMAR & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Mr. Akash Singh and Ms. Priyanka Saneja, Advs. for R- 1.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALORDER% 25.02.20261. No one appears on behalf of appellant/Insurance Company.2. Even on 19th May 2025, it is noted by the Court that no one hadappeared for appellant/Insurance Company. The Court had given directions that the matter can be attempted to be settled; however, before the Pre-sitting Lok Adalat, the Manager of the Legal of the appellant/Insurance Company appeared on a couple of days, and on the rest of the days, nobody was present for appellant/Insurance Company.3. Even on the last date of 10th November 2025, no appearance has beennoted on behalf of appellant/Insurance Company.4. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for...
- ‹ Prev
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- Next ›
- Last »