Shantnu Tyagi & Anr. vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided Feb 02, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1255316

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1255316
Court: Delhi Orders High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Jasmeet Singh
Decided On: Feb 02, 2026
Case Number: W.P.(C)/1367/2026
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shantnu Tyagi & Anr.

Advocate Mr. Kuldeep Jauhari, Mr. Anubhav Tyagi, Mr. Sahil, Mr. Bharat Gautam

Respondent

Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Advocate Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Ms. Antara Mishra, Ms. Anmol M.Kaur

Excerpt

.....petitioner; b. issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing the respondent no.2 to initiate and/or conduct vigilance inquiry proceedings in relation to the allegations made in the complaint dated 18.07.2025 and complete the inquiry proceedings in a time bound manner;” 2. mr. tyagi, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the delhi development authority (“dda) is acting in collusion with one mr. ram kishan and is creating rights in the property of the petitioner.this is a digitally signed order. the authenticity of the order can be re-verified from delhi high court order portal by scanning the qr code shown above. the order is downloaded from the dhc server on 05/02/2026 at 12:39:24 3. he further states that he only limits his prayer seeking a direction against respondent dda to decide the complaint dated 18.07.2025 of the petitioner. 4. for the said reasons, issue notice. 5. ms. kaur, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and without admitting any of the averments made in the petition, states that the dda will dispose of the representation dated 02.12.2025 of the petitioner expeditiously and in any case not later than 12 week from today. 6. the petitioner shall also be granted a personal hearing. 7. the petition is disposed of in aforesaid terms.jasmeet singh, j february 2, 2026/dmthis is a digitally signed order. the authenticity of the order can be re-verified from delhi high court order portal by scanning the qr code shown above. the order is downloaded from the dhc server on 05/02/2026 at 12:39:24

Full Judgment

$~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1367/2026 SHANTNU TYAGI .....Petitioner Through: Mr Kuldeep Jauhari, Mr Anubhav Tyagi, Mr Sahil , Mr Bharat Gautam, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms Prabhsahay Kaur, SC, Adv Ms. Antara Mishra, Adv Ms. Anmol M.Kaur CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers:- “A. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing the Respondents to act upon the complaint dated 18.07.2025 filed by the Petitioner; B. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing the Respondent No.2 to initiate and/or conduct vigilance inquiry proceedings in relation to the allegations made in the complaint dated 18.07.2025 and complete the inquiry proceedings in a time bound manner;” 2. Mr. Tyagi, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the Delhi Development Authority (“DDA) is acting in collusion with one Mr. Ram Kishan and is creating rights in the property of the petitioner.

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/02/2026 at 12:39:24 3. He further states that he only limits his prayer seeking a direction against respondent DDA to decide the complaint dated 18.07.2025 of the petitioner. 4. For the said reasons, issue notice. 5. Ms. Kaur, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and without admitting any of the averments made in the petition, states that the DDA will dispose of the representation dated 02.12.2025 of the petitioner expeditiously and in any case not later than 12 week from today. 6. The petitioner shall also be granted a personal hearing. 7. The petition is disposed of in aforesaid terms.

JASMEET SINGH, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026/DM

Same Court & Year Delhi Orders · 2026 Same Parties Shantnu Tyagi & Anr. vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors. Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Jasmeet Singh