Jeet Kumar vs Mahesh Kumar

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided Feb 26, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1269399

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1269399
Court: Delhi Orders High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Amit Sharma
Decided On: Feb 26, 2026
Case Number: RC.REV./709/2019
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jeet Kumar

Respondent

Mahesh Kumar

Advocate Mr. Rahul Bhagat

Excerpt

.....petition bearing no. 65/2017;b) set aside the impugned order dated 04.09.2019 passed by shri ajay nagar, addl. rent controller, west, tis hazari, delhi in case titled as "mahesh kumar vs. jeet kumar" in eviction petition being e. no.65/2017, whereby, ld. addl. rent controller dismisse d the leave to defend application of the petitioner and allowed the eviction petition of the respondent;c) allow the present petition of the petitioner, thereby, setting aside the order dated 04.09.2019 passed by shri ajay nagar, addl. rent controller, west, tis hazari, delhi in case titled as "mahesh kumar vs. jeet kumar" in eviction petition being e. no.65/2017; d) pass any other or further order as this hon'ble court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case.”3. none appears on behalf of the petitioner.4. there was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner on the last three dates of hearing as well, i.e., 15.09.2025, 27.01.2026 and 19.02.2026.5. report with regard to the court notice issued to the petitioner vide orderdated 27.01.2026, reflects that the same has been served.6. learned counsel for the respondent submits that possession of the subject premises has been taken over on 28.11.2025.7. in view of the above, the petition is dismissed in default for non- prosecution and disposed of accordingly.8. pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. amit sharma, j february 26, 2026/nk/db

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ RC.REV. 709/2019 & CM APPL. 55596/2019 JEET KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: None.
versus
MAHESH KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Bhagat, Adv. (through VC).
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

ORDER

% 26.02.2026

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The present petition under Section 25-B (8) of Delhi Rent Control Act,

seeks the following prayers:- “a) call for the records from the court of Shri Ajay Nagar, Addl. Rent Controller, West, Tis Hazari, Delhi of the case titled as "Mahesh Kumar Vs. Jeet Kumar" being the file of Eviction Petition bearing No. 65/2017;

b) set aside the impugned order dated 04.09.2019 passed by Shri Ajay Nagar, Addl. Rent Controller, West, Tis Hazari, Delhi in case titled as "Mahesh Kumar Vs. Jeet Kumar" in Eviction Petition being E. No.65/2017, whereby, Ld. Addl. Rent Controller dismisse d the leave to defend application of the Petitioner and allowed the eviction petition of the Respondent;

c) Allow the present petition of the petitioner, thereby, setting aside the order dated 04.09.2019 passed by Shri Ajay Nagar, Addl. Rent Controller, West, Tis Hazari, Delhi in case titled as "Mahesh Kumar Vs. Jeet Kumar" in Eviction Petition being E. No.65/2017; d) pass any other or further order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case.”

3. None appears on behalf of the petitioner.

4. There was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner on the last three dates of hearing as well, i.e., 15.09.2025, 27.01.2026 and 19.02.2026.

5. Report with regard to the Court notice issued to the petitioner vide order

dated 27.01.2026, reflects that the same has been served.

6. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that possession of the subject premises has been taken over on 28.11.2025.

7. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed in default for non- prosecution and disposed of accordingly.

8. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. AMIT SHARMA, J FEBRUARY 26, 2026/nk/db

Same Court & Year Delhi Orders · 2026 Same Parties Jeet Kumar vs Mahesh Kumar Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Amit Sharma