Delhi Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr. Harmeet Singh vs Border Security Force
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2738/2026DR. HARMEET SINGH.....Petitioner Through: Dr. S S Hooda and Mr. Shaurya Banshtu, Advs.versusBORDER SECURITY FORCE.....Respondent Through: Mr. Siddhartha Shankar Ray, CGSC, Mr. Amit Rana, Ms. Sonali Modi and Mr. Mukul Dev, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAORDER% 26.02.20261. This petition has been filed with the following prayers:-(a) Issue a Writ, order, or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondent to pass a reasoned order deciding the Post Confirmation Petition U/s 117(2) of the BSF Act preferred by the Petitioner against Findings and Sentence of the Ld. GSFC and Revision GSFC conducted in respect of the Petitioner; and(b) Award the cost of Litigation in favour of thePetitioner;2. Mr. Siddhartha Shankar Ray, learned counsel for the respondent statesthat the respondent shall decide the post confirmation petition filed ...
M/S D.R. International Through Its Proprietor Sh. Dinesh Singh Panwar ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 444/2026M/S D.R. INTERNATIONAL THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SH.DINESH SINGH PANWAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhil Krishan Maggu and Ms. Oshin Maggu, Advocates.versusM/S JU CARGO LOGISTICS & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 26.02.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.CM APPL. 13206/2026 (for exemption)2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of.CM(M) 444/20263. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227of the Constitution of India, 1950, assailing the order dated 18th February, 2026, passed by the trial court in CS (Comm.) No. 579/2021, whereby the suit filed by the petitioner was dismissed in default for non-prosecution and non- appearance.4. After some arguments, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks leaveto withdraw the present petition with liberty to approac...
Kela Devi vs Government of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 341/2026 KELA DEVI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Divyanshu Pandit, Adv.versusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Avni Singh (Panel Counsel) Mr. Amit Gupta (SPC) along with Mr. Vidur Dwivedi (GP) and Mr. Atik Gill, Adv. for R2/ SHO- Kalyan Puri (Delhi Police)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 26.02.2026 CM APPL. 13310/2026 (Exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of.CONT.CAS(C) 341/20263. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging wilfuldisobedience/ non-compliance of the directions contained in the order dated11.12.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 18835/2025. The said orderreads as under:- 3. The present petition seeks implementation of the directions contained in the order dated 07.05.2025, passed in Eviction Petition No. 620/2022 under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citiz...
Manindra Nath Barman & Ors. vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2684/2026 MANINDRA NATH BARMAN & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Himanshu Gautam and Ms. Niharika Punn, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sahaj Garg, SPC, Mr. Deepansh Sharma, GP and Mr. S Chakraborty, Under SecretaryCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAORDER% 26.02.20261. This petition has been filed with the following prayers:-(i) Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to cover the services of the Petitioners under the ambit of Old Pension Scheme in terms of the OM dated 03.03.2023.(ii) Pass any such orders as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit inthe light of above mentioned facts and circumstances of the case.2. In effect, the petitioner contends that they are covered by the OldPension Scheme in terms of Office Memorandums dated 03.03.2023 and 09.04.2024 issued by the Department of Personnel and Train...
Abdul Waseem & Anr. vs Abdul Azim
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 201/2026 & I.A. 5423/2026 ABDUL WASEEM & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rohit Gandhi, Mr. Hargun Singh Kalra, Mr. Shubham Bhati & Mr. Vidur Marwah, Advs.versusABDUL AZIM .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vasu Goyal, Adv. (through VC)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 26.02.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration &Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to theprayer made.3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of theproceedings is extended by two years as prayed for.4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, JFEBRUARY 26, 2026haThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code sho...
Anil Jha vs Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi & Anr..
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 689/2026 ANIL JHA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sushree Sipra Sahu, Advocate (through VC)versusGOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OFDELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC (CRL) for State with Mr. Sangeet Sibo, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 26.02.20261. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, at thisstage, does not press the present petition, and states that the petitioner will approach the Chairman of the concerned District Witness Protection Committee for grant of protection.2. The Threat Perception Report has already been filed by the DCPconcerned.3. In view thereof, the present petition stand dismissed as withdrawn.However, it is directed that the Chairman of the District Witness Protection Committee will ensure expeditious disposal of the appropriate application by the petitioner.4. The order be uploaded on th...
Jatinder Singh Gill@Jassi vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 849/2026 & CRL.M.(BAIL). 446/2026 JATINDER SINGH GILL@JASSI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Varun Deswal, Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Mr. Rahul S., Mr. Ayush Kr. Singh & Ms. Kashish Ahuja, Advocates.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Akhand Pratap Singh, SPP for State with Ms. Samridhi Dhobal, Mr. Krishna Mohan Chandel, Mr. Hritwik Maurya & Ms. Lisa Pegwal, Advocates. SI Vipin Malik.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 26.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 6451-6453/2026 (for exemptions) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications stand disposed of.BAIL APPLN. 849/20261. The petitioner has sought interim bail for a period of four monthsin connection with FIR No. 455/2024 registered at Police Station Special Cell, under Sections 8(c)/21/22/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The application is predicated on medical ground as he has been advised coronary arter...
Rohit Kumar vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2736/2026 ROHIT KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Prashant Mishra & Mr. Jitendra Kr. Singh, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....RespondentsThrough: Ms. Arti Bansal, CGSC with Ms. Shruti Goel, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAORDER% 26.02.2026CM APPL. 13295/20261. Exemption is allowed, subject to all and just exceptions.2. The application is disposed of.W.P.(C) 2736/20263. This is a petition filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated16.08.2025 which has been passed by the Assistant Commandant, RPSF, Lumding, Assam.4. The Petitioner is working in the Railway Protection Special Force,Northeast Frontier.5. Hence, no cause of action has arisen within the territorial jurisdictionof this Court for us to entertain the present petition.6. The petition is dismissed as not maintainable. Liberty shall be withthe pe...
Municipal Corporation of Delhi vs Sh. Samarjeet Singh & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 345/2026 MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Petitioner Through: Advocate (appearance not given)versusSH. SAMARJEET SINGH & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Meghna De, Mr. Ishaan Goel, Ms. L. Gangmei, Advs. Dr. Divya Swamy, Mr. Anubhav Agrawal, Ms. Nidhi Kumar, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 26.02.20261. The present petition alleges wilful disobedience/non-compliance ofthe directions contained in the order dated 17.12.2025, passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 19147/2025. The operative direction therein reads as under:-2. It is the case of the petitioner that despite the aforesaid direction, theexecution proceedings have continued against the petitioner and a recovery certificate dated 06.02.2026 (Annexure P-3) has been issued. The recovery certificate dated 06.02.2026 reads as under:-3. Issue notice.4. Learned counsel, as aforesaid, accepts notice on behalf of theresponde...
Virender Kumar vs Rupesh Kumar Thakur, Ceo, Delhi Urban Shelter Improv ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 338/2026 VIRENDER KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Megha De and Ms. L. Gangmei, Advocates.versusRUPESH KUMAR THAKUR, CEO,DELHI URBAN SHELTER IMPROVEMENT BOARD.....Respondent Through: Mr. Anuj Chaturvedi, Ms. Richa Dhawan and Ms. Yashita, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 26.02.20261. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging wilfuldisobedience/ non-compliance of the directions contained in the order dated 25.08.2025 passed by this court in W.P. (C) 12810/2025. The same, inter alia, directs as under: 4. In view of the fact that the reliefs sought by the petitioner are, according to DUSIB, already under administrative consideration, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that DUSIB will treat the present writ petition as a representation and pass a reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks from today.2. During the course of hearing, it is p...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »