Delhi Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vishveshwarya Group of Institutions vs Pharmacy Council of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 18947/2025 & CM APPL. 4472/2026 VISHVESHWARYA GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Chandrashekhar Singh, Mr. Ayush Aanand, Advs.versusPHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Mr. Divyansh Singh, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 27.02.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers: a) quash the decision letter dated 14.11.2025 issued by Respondent, whereby it has rejected the Petitioners Application seeking Extension of Approval for the D. Pharm and B. Pharm courses for session 2025-26; and b) direct the Respondent, to consequently grant extension of approval to Petitioner institution for the aforesaid D. Pharm and B. pharm courses, for the academic session 2026-27;...2. The decision dated 14.11.2025 shows blatant and malafide misuse/ abuse of the process of law...
Chattar Singh vs Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.A. 458/2009 CHATTAR SINGH .....Appellant Through: Ms. Juhi Arora, Adv.versusGOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Kiran Bairwa, APP for the State with SI Pradeep Kumar, PS KM pur.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAVORDER% 27.02.20261. Hybrid Mode.2. It has been reported by the learned APP that the death of the Appellant-Chattar Singh has been verified and the verification report is there on record.3. In view of the fact that the learned counsel for the Appellant has clarified the LRs of the Appellant do not want to continue with the appeal, therefore, appeal stands abated. VIMAL KUMAR YADAV, J FEBRUARY 27, 2026/psThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 10:39:35...
Ravi Kumar Jain & Ors. vs Union Bank of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
$~98-99* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2825/2026 (Disposed of) RAVI KUMAR JAIN & ORS. ...Petitioners UNION BANK OF INDIA & ORS. ...Respondents R2 + W.P.(C) 2826/2026(Disposed of) NEERU JAIN & ORS. .....Petitioners UNION BANK OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents R2CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 16.03.2026 CM APPL. 15779/2026 in W.P.(C) 2825/2026 (Disposed of)1. This is an application filed under Section 151 of the CPC, 1908 seeking2. For the reasons stated in the application, issue notice.3. Mr. Kumar, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the petitioners4. Hence, the present application is allowed and the order dated5. The application is disposed of in aforesaid terms. CM APPL. 15877/2026 in W.P.(C) 2826/2026 (Disposed of)6. This is an application filed under Section 151 of the CPC, 1908 seeking7. For the reasons stated in the application, issue notice.8. Mr. Kumar, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the petitioners9....
Rani Devi vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 4305/2025 RANI DEVI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Anjali Pathak, Advocate.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vikrant Nitesh Goyal, Mr. Yash Basoya, Mr. Rakshit Tyagi, Mr. Kunal Dixit, Ms. Laavanya Kaushik and Ms. Khyati, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl) with Ms. Priyam Agarwal, Mr. Abhinav Kumar Arya and Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advocates with Insp. Harish, SI Jai Singh, PS-BHD Nagar. Mr. Premtosh Kumar Mishra and Mr. Shrey Sharma, Advocates for CBI. Missing son of the petitioner in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAORDER% 27.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 6714/2026 (early hearing)1. This is an application praying for the pre-ponement of the date of hearing of the captioned writ petition.2. Bearing in mind the contents of the application, it is allowed.3. This application stands disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 4305/20254. This is a petition under Articl...
Indra Fish Market Association vs Dda and Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHIAT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 1102/2026 INDRA FISH MARKET ASSOCIATION .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abdul Qadir, Mr. Yadunandan Bansal, Mr. Syed Kashan Ali, Mr. Shawariya Muzaffar and Ms. Mallika Rani, Advs. (M:9990660275)versusDDA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Beenashaw N. Soni, Addl. Standing Counsel, DDA with Ms. Mansi Jain and Ms. Katyani Malhotra, Advs. (M: 9810046611)CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 13.03.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CM APPL.15475/2026 (for modification of order) in W.P.(C) 1102/20262. The present application has been filed by the Petitioner under Section151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking modification of the orderdated 27th January, 2026.3. The Petitioner is a registered welfare association stating to represent 37fish and vegetable vendors, who are vending at the Indra Fish Market, opposite Bhumme Heen Camp, Sant Guru Ravidas Marg, Kalkaji, New Delhi- 110019. The l...
Rcc Infraventures Limited vs Union Bank of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2823/2026 RCC INFRAVENTURES LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: None.versusUNION BANK OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Brijesh Kumar Tamber and Ms. Arani Mukherjee, Advs. for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 17.03.2026 CM APPL. 16455/20261. This is an application filed under Section 151 of the CPC, 1908, on behalf of the respondent No. 2 seeking modification of theorder dated 27.02.2026 passed by this court by recording thepresence of the counsel.2. For the reasons stated in the application, issue notice.3. Mr. Tamber, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent no. 2.4. There is nobody appearing on behalf of the other respondents today but the matter is being taken up for hearing.5. Accordingly, the Order dated 27.02.2026 shall be deemed to record the appearance of Mr. Brijesh Kumar Tamber, Advocate for the respondent No. 2.6. The application is disposed of in aforesaid terms....
Sarla & Ors vs Ombir & Ors ( M/S the Magma Hdi , Gen. Insurance Co Ltd ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
$~11 & 12* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ MAC.APP. 629/2018 SARLA & ORS .....Appellants OMBIR & ORS ( M/S THE MAGMA HDI , GEN. INSURANCE CO LTD ) .....Respondents + MAC.APP. 502/2019, CM APPL. 19825/2019 & CM APPL. M/S CHEMI TECH ENGINEER PVT LTD .....Appellant SARLA & ORS (MAGMA HDI GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ) .....Respondents Appearances: Mr. Ved Vyas Tripathi, Mr. Vaibhav Verma, Advocates for R-5 item No. 11 and for R-6 in item 12. Mr. Umesh Chandra Mishra, Advocate for appellant in item No. 11 and for R-1 in item 12. Ms. Tina Garg, M. K. Ghosh Advocates for M/s Chemitech ltd, R-2 in item no. 11 and petitioner in item 12.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALORDER% 27.02.20261. The MAC.APP. 629/2018 has been filed by claimant, the mother of the deceased, who had passed away in the accident on 16th March 2018. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT) had allowed the claim petition, being MACT No. 14338/2015, and awarded compensation of Rs. 1...
Krishan Prasad Sharma vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.A. 1258/2013 KRISHAN PRASAD SHARMA .....Appellant Through: Mr.S.B.Dandapani, Adv. (through VC) from DHCLSC.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State (through VC) along with Mr.Arsalan Naik and Mr.Siddhaartha Goyal, Advs. SI Shilpy Gupta PS South Campus.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAVORDER% 27.02.20261. Hybrid Mode.2. Learned counsel for the Appellant stated that Appellant has completed his sentence and the nominal roll substantiates this fact.3. The Appellant is resident of Nepal and the record, either with the Court or with the police, does not have any address of Nepal.4. Report on the process issued suggests that Appellant is not availableat the local address and ultimately it has been submitted upon by both prosecution and learned counsel for Appellant (appearing through VC) that the matter may be disposed of.5. In such circumstances there appears no reason to keep the app...
Shri Narayan and Co & Anr. vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
$~50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 112/2026 & CM APPL. 589/2026 SHRI NARAYAN AND CO & ANR. .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not givenversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vikrant Nilesh Goyal, Ms. Laavanya Kaushik, Mr. Kunal Dixit, Mr. Piyush Wadhwa and Ms. Khyaati Bansal, Advocates for UOI Mr. Anurag Ojha, SSC with Mr. Dipak Raj, Advocate for R-3 and R-4 Mr. Pragyan Pradip Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajesh Sharma and Mr. Nikhil Sharma, AdvocatesCORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER % 26.02.20261. On instructions, a prayer for withdrawal is made as prima facie it is noticed that this Court does not have territorial jurisdiction. 2. The petition, accordingly, stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to canvas the grievance before the Court having territorial jurisdiction. 3. Pending application also stands disposed of.This is a digitally signed...
Jcl Infra Pvt Ltd vs Union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 55/2026 & I.A. 941/2026 JCL INFRA PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Faiyaz Hasan & Mr. Nadeem Khan, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jagdish Chandra, CGSC with Ms. Saxena, Adv. (through VC)CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN ORDER % 26.02.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to the prayer made. 3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of the proceedings is extended by nine months as prayed for. 4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, J FEBRUARY 26, 2026 haThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »