Delhi Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Manish Paswan & Anr. vs State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 6447/2024 MANISH PASWAN & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Appearance not givenversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State with Ms. Puja Mann and Mr. Sandeep Sinhmar, Advocates alongwith SI Himani, PS Gandhi Nagar Mr. Nitesh Saini, Advocate for R-2 alongwith R-2 in personCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 27.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 24649/2024 (exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of CRL.M.C. 6447/2024 & CRL.M.A. 24648/20243. By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of theFIR bearing No. 592/2022, registered at Police Station Gandhi Nagar, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 363/366/376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 6 of POCSO Act, 2012 (hereafter IPC').4. Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State5. All the peti...
Delhi Development Authority vs Sachin Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 12550/2025 and CM APPL. 51173/2025 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Niharika Ahluwalia, Mr. D. Sharma, Advs.versusSACHIN KUMAR & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Ms. Priti Kumari, Mr. Pankaj Kumar Ray, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 27.02.20261. A perusal of the record reflects that the certified copy of theOrder dated 27.02.2025 [hereinafter referred to as Impugned Order]passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal [hereinafter referred to as CAT] which has been placed on record by the Petitioner is incomprehensible. The Impugned Order is concluded at printed page no. 40 of the paper book, while printed page no. 41 vaguely begins with some Para no. 2 going up to page 57 but there is no conclusion.2. A perusal of the Impugned Order reflects that CAT has taken uptwo Original Applications (OA) bearing Nos.2266/2023 and issue. ...
Asian Footwears Private Limited vs Bruton Footwear Private Limited & A ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 931/2025, I.A. 21534/2025 & I.A. 21535/2025 ASIAN FOOTWEARS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Prateek Kumar, Ms. Aarushi Jain, Mr. Yojit Pareek, Ms. Ankita, Mr. Prassant Kumar Sharma and Mr. Chetan Charitra, Advocates.versusBRUTON FOOTWEAR PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Sagar Shivam Jaiswal and Mr. Adnan Hussain, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAORDER% 27.02.20261. Parties submit that the inter se disputes have been resolved amicablyunder the aegis of the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The terms of settlement have been reduced into writing vide the Settlement Agreement dated 16.02.2026.2. The Settlement Agreement dated 16.02.2026 has been filed by the DelhiHigh Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The terms of the Settlement Agreement have been recorded in para 1 at page 3 to para 18 at page 9 of the Settlement Agreement dated 16.02.2026.3...
Kapil Kochhar vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 16030/2025 KAPIL KOCHHAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Madhuresh Chaudhary, AdvversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ripudaman Bhardwaj CGSC with Mr. Sanjay Pal GP for R- Mr. Ramesh Babu, Ms. Manisha Singh, Ms. Tanya Chowdhary Advocates for R-3CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 27.02.20261. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition.2. Hence, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. JASMEET SINGH, J FEBRUARY 27, 2026/DM/DMThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 17:10:03...
Sanjeev Kumar Batra vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 3278/2025 SANJEEV KUMAR BATRA .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner through VCversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC for State with ASI Vinod KumarCORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 27.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 6558/2026 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.A. 6557/2026 (withdrawal)1. The applicant seeks withdrawal of the present bail application without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the learned Sessions Court.2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed.3. The application stands disposed of. BAIL. APPLN. 3278/20254. In view of the above, the bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the application, and the same shall be considered by the BAIL APPLN. 3278/2025 Page 1 of 2 Court concerned in accordance...
Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi &Ors. vs Chandi Ram Rangi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 1856/2005 GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI &ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Gaurav Dhingra and Mr. Shashank Singh, Advs.versusCHANDI RAM RANGI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Nitesh Kumar and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 27.02.20261. A perusal of the Impugned Order dated 27.05.2003 passed bythe Central Administrative Tribunal [hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal] in O.A. No. 1361/2003 reveals that the same came to be issued on the very first date of hearing, without affording an opportunity of hearing to the Petitioners, who were arrayed as Respondents before the Tribunal.2. In essence, the Tribunal directed that the earlier servicerendered by the Respondent herein in the Directorate of Health Services, Delhi Administration and in the Health Centre, University of Delhi be counted as qualifying service for the purposes of pensionary benefits....
Shivam Bhadoria @ Chotu @ Tushar vs State(Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4104/2025 SHIVAM BHADORIA @ CHOTU @ TUSHAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. K.K. Manan, Senior Advocate with Ms. Uditi Bali, Mr. K.S. Choudhary, Ms. Rishika Ahuja, Ms. Jagriti, Mr. Lavish Chandra, Ms. Yakshi & Mr. Ankur Rana, Advocates.versusSTATE(NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aashneet Singh, APP for State.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 27.02.20261. By way of the present application under Section 483 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 65/2025 dated 03.05.2025, registered under Sections 109(1)/309(6)/61(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act, 1959, at Police Station Tilak Marg, District New Delhi.2. In the course of hearing, Mr. Aashneet Singh, learned AdditionalPublic Prosecutor, submits that a material report of the Forensic Science Laboratory [FSL] is expected today, in respect of t...
M/S Tej Ram Dharam Paul & Anr. vs M/S Dholakia Tobacco Pvt Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 704/2023 M/S TEJ RAM DHARAM PAUL & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Amit Jain and Mr. Vikrant Malhotra, Advocates.versusM/S DHOLAKIA TOBACCO PVT LTD. & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Sarath J Prakash, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAORDER% 27.02.2026 I.A. 5570/2026 (Under Order XXIII Rule 3, CPC)1. This is an application under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 filed on behalf of the plaintiffs and the defendants.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties submit that partieshave been able to amicably resolve their disputes out of Court and the said terms of settlement have been reduced into writing and enumerated in para 7 of the application.3. For convenience para 7 is extracted hereunder: 7. That the parties have mutually agreed to settle the matter as per the following terms and conditions: a. That the Defendants acknowledge that the ...
Jatin vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4157/2025 & CRL.M.A. 6620-6621/2026 JATIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vimal Tyagi, Mr. Balaji Pathak, Mr. Sudhanshu Tyagi, Ms. Tripuari Jha and Mr. Akshay Rathi, Advocates.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aashneet Singh, APP with Insp. Parveen Kumar and SI Ankit, PS- Moti Nagar.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 27.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 445/2026 (for restoration)1. This is an application filed for the restoration of the bail application.2. Mr. Aashneet Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, is present, as is Mr. Ram Chander, who is the father of the deceased.3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, for the reasons stated herein, the application is allowed, and Bail Application No. 4157/2025 is restored to its original number and is taken on Board. BAIL APPLN. 4157/20254. This is an application for regular bail in connection with FIR No. BAIL APPLN. 4157/2025 Page 1 of 2 the India...
Haider Ali vs State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 3735/2025 HAIDER ALI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aadil Jameel, Adv.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) ...Respondent Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State with Ms. Puja Mann and Mr. SAndeep Sinhmar, Advs. along with SI Dinesh Kumar.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 27.02.20261. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, at this stage, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present bail application.2. Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.3. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J FEBRUARY 27, 2026/A/RThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 10:13:28...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »