Skip to content

Delhi Orders Court January 2026 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jan 30 2026

Proshottam Lal Mehta vs Dda

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Jan-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2074/1995 PROSHOTTAM LAL MEHTA .....Petitioner Through: NoneversusDDA .....Respondent Through: Ms Manika Tripathy SC for DDA with Mr Aakash Mohar Adv and Mr Gautam Yadav Adv and Mr Saksham Singh AdvCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 30.01.20261. On 24.11.2025 a Court notice was issued to the petitioner as well ashis counsel.2. The Service Report states that no such person resides at the givenaddress.3. For the said reasons, the petition is dismissed for non prosecution withliberty to the petitioner to revive in case the petitioner is interested in prosecuting the same.JASMEET SINGH, JJANUARY 30, 2026/ASThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/02/2026 at 13:09:44...


Jan 30 2026

Ramesh Chand vs Subhashish Panda

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Jan-30-2026

$~77 & 78* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 810/2023, CM APPL. 10288/2026 RAMESH CHAND .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Hina Rajput, Adv.versusSUBHASHISH PANDA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Standing Counsel for DDA with Mr. Kuljeet Singh, Adv. for DDA Mr. Abhinav Singh, Adv. for GNCTD + W.P.(C) 3904/2022 & CM APPL. 10283/2026 RAMESH CHAND .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Hina Rajput, Adv.versusDDA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Avni Singh, Panel Counsel, GNCTD Mr. Amit Singh Chauhan, Mr. Kuldeep Kasana, Mr. Udita Singh Chauhan, Advs. for MCD Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Standing Counsel for DDA with Mr. Kuljeet Singh, Adv. for DDACORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 13.02.2026 CM APPL. 10287/2026 & CM APPL. 10282/20261. Ms. Rajput, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to file photographs to show that the orders have not been complied with.2. Let the same be done before the next date of hearing.3. List on 28.07.2026. JA...


Jan 30 2026

Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd. vs Unison Hotels Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Jan-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P. (COMM) 197/2023 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amarjit Singh Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Bindu Saxena, Mr. Tanpreet Gulati & Ms. Aprajita, Advs.versusUNISON HOTELS PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aseem Chaturvedi, Mr. Arpit Kumar Singh, Mr. Shivank Diddi & Mr. Arsh Alok, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 23.03.2026 I.A. 3064/2026 On request of learned senior counsel for the applicant/petitioner, put up on 28.05.2026. AVNEESH JHINGAN, J MARCH 23, 2026 Ch This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/03/2026 at 16:00:57...


Jan 30 2026

T. Prasad Rao Dora vs Ather Parwez Ansari

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Jan-30-2026

$~16 & 17* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P. 1/2022 & I.A. 2535/2022 ATHER PARWEZ ANSARI .....Petitioner BIMAL KUMAR MISHRA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tushar Ranjan Mohanty, Advocate Ms. Zehra Khan, Advocate. + O.M.P. 5/2022 & I.A. 10502/2022 T. PRASAD RAO DORA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kotla Harshavardhan, Ms. Gayatri Gupta and Ms. Divija Mahajan, Advs ATHER PARWEZ ANSARI .....RespondentCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASADORDER% 30.01.20261. Learned Counsels for the Petitioners in both the matters seek permission to withdraw the present Petitions with liberty to take recourse to the remedies available to the parties in accordance with law.2. Leave and liberty, as prayed for, is granted.3. The Petitions are disposed of as withdrawn along with the pending applications, if any. SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J JANUARY 30, 2026 Rahul...


Jan 30 2026

Praveen Gupta vs Registrar Cooperative Societies and Ors.

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Jan-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 12259/2021 & CM APPL. 38360/2021, CM APPL. PRAVEEN GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Harshit Jain, alongwith Dr. S.K. Yadav, Mr. Arjun Drall and Ms. Priyanka Yadav, Advs.versusREGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Akhil Mittal, ASC - DDA, alongwith Ms. Riddhi Jain and Ms. Shayna Das Pattanayak, Advs. for DDA. Ms Avni Singh Panel Counsel for GNCTDCORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 30.01.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The allotment of flats in Sri Durga Cooperative Group HousingSociety, which has been challenged in this case, has already taken place and the decision on the Petitioners expulsion from the membership of the said Society is already pending before the Delhi Cooperative Tribunal (hereinafter DCT).3. In view thereof, the present writ petition is infructuous and is accordingly disposed of. All pending applications, if any, are also disposed ...


Jan 30 2026

Ishan Joshi vs Reena Mukherjee

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Jan-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.A. 494/2022, CRL.M.A. 1817/2026, CRL.M.A. 1818/2026, CRL.M.A. 3242/2026 & CRL.M.A. 3243/2026 ISHAN JOSHI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Madhav Khurana, Senior Advocate with Ms. Trisha Mittal, Mr.Amit Badesra, Mr. Nishant Sharma and Ms. Femtha Fathima, Advocates.versusREENA MUKHERJEE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Soutik Banerjee, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHAORDER% 30.01.20261. The learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the matter has been settled between the parties before the mediation centre and the settlement agreement has come on record.2. The offence alleged under Section 499 is compoundable.Hence, the acquittal can be confirmed in the light of the settlement arrived at and the accused acquitted in terms of Section 320(8) Cr.P.C. The parties shall be bound by the settlement.3. The appeal stands disposed of in view of the settlement agreement.4. Pending application shall ...


Jan 30 2026

Neena Aggarwal vs State of Delhi & Anr.

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Jan-30-2026

$~28 & 29* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 6190/2024 & CRL.M.A. 23659/2024 NEENA AGGARWAL .....Petitioner STATE OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents R-2 (29) + CRL.M.C. 6191/2024 & CRL.M.A. 23660/2024 AJAY AGGARWAL .....Petitioner STATE OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent R-2CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 30.01.20261. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners states that the petitioners have been discharged by the learned Trial Court, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the present petitions.2. Accordingly, the present petitions alongwith pending applications i.e., CRL.M.A. 23659/2024 and CRL.M.A. 23660/2024 stands dismissed as withdrawn.3. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J JANUARY 30, 2026/ns R...


Jan 30 2026

Tej Pal Singh vs Shayam Sunder Gupta

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Jan-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 1434/2025 TEJ PAL SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Gupta, Adv.versusSHAYAM SUNDER GUPTA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajiv Mehra, Mr. Jagjeet Singh and Mr. Devansh Singh, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 30.01.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. Let a reply be filed on behalf of the respondent before the next date of hearing, with an advance copy served upon the opposite side.3. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J JANUARY 30, 2026/sds/ikThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/02/2026 at 11:38...


Jan 30 2026

Shobha and Others vs Yogesh Kumar Sharma

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Jan-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P. 1140/2023 SHOBHA AND OTHERS .....Petitioners Through: NoneversusYOGESH KUMAR SHARMA .....Respondent Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 30.01.2026 None appears in this case. Previous record also shows multiple consecutive absences on behalf of petitioners. It seems that petitioners are not interested to pursue this matter. Therefore, the petition is dismissed is default. GIRISH KATHPALIA, J JANUARY 30, 2026/as This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/01/2026 at 14:11:46...


Jan 30 2026

J J Imprints Pvt Ltd Through Sarwan Jain vs State Bank of India Throug ...

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Jan-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 13225/2024 J J IMPRINTS PVT LTD THROUGH SARWAN JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr Ashwani Kumar Singla, AdvversusSTATE BANK OF INDIA THROUGH BRANCH MANAGER .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajiv Kapur, SC for SBI along with Mr. Akshit Kapur, AoR and Ms. Riya Sood, AdvCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 30.01.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following reliefs: i) For issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction to the State Bank of India to reverse the entry i.e. repay in the account from which it was received the amount (the petitioner is ready to execute indemnity if so required). ii) For issuance of interim orders to transfer the funds to an interest bearing time deposit of 2 years.2. The facts are that the petitioner was to pay a sum of Rs. 15 lakhs toM/s Vardhman Agencies on account of business dealings. However, the petitioner paid the amount online ...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial