Ishan Joshi vs Reena Mukherjee

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided Jan 30, 2026

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1267784

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1267784
Court: Delhi Orders High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Chandrasekharan Sudha
Decided On: Jan 30, 2026
Case Number: CRL.A./494/2022
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ishan Joshi

Advocate Mr. Madhav Khurana, Ms. Trisha Mittal, Mr. Nishant Sharma, Ms. Femtha Fathima

Respondent

Reena Mukherjee

Advocate Mr. Soutik Banerjee

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ crl.a. 494/2022, crl.m.a. 1817/2026, crl.m.a. 1818/2026, crl.m.a. 3242/2026 & crl.m.a. 3243/2026 ishan joshi .....appellant through: mr. madhav khurana, senior advocate with ms. trisha mittal, mr.amit badesra, mr. nishant sharma and ms. femtha fathima, advocates.versusreena mukherjee .....respondent through: mr. soutik banerjee, advocate.coram:hon'ble ms. justice chandrasekharan sudhaorder% 30.01.20261. the learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the matter has been settled between the parties before the mediation centre and the settlement agreement has come on record.2. the offence alleged under section 499 is compoundable.hence, the acquittal can be confirmed in the light of the settlement arrived at and the accused acquitted in terms of section 320(8) cr.p.c. the parties shall be bound by the settlement.3. the appeal stands disposed of in view of the settlement agreement.4. pending application shall also stand closed. chandrasekharan sudha, j january 30, 2026 kd

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.A. 494/2022, CRL.M.A. 1817/2026, CRL.M.A. 1818/2026, CRL.M.A. 3242/2026 & CRL.M.A. 3243/2026 ISHAN JOSHI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Madhav Khurana, Senior Advocate with Ms. Trisha Mittal, Mr.Amit Badesra, Mr. Nishant Sharma and Ms. Femtha Fathima, Advocates.
versus
REENA MUKHERJEE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Soutik Banerjee, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA

ORDER

% 30.01.2026

1. The learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the matter has been settled between the parties before the mediation centre and the settlement agreement has come on record.

2. The offence alleged under Section 499 is compoundable.

Hence, the acquittal can be confirmed in the light of the settlement arrived at and the accused acquitted in terms of Section 320(8) Cr.P.C. The parties shall be bound by the settlement.

3. The appeal stands disposed of in view of the settlement agreement.

4. Pending application shall also stand closed. CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J JANUARY 30, 2026 kd

Same Court & Year Delhi Orders · 2026 Same Parties Ishan Joshi vs Reena Mukherjee Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Chandrasekharan Sudha