Delhi Orders Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Attar Singh Kashyap vs Uoi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6106/2006 ATTAR SINGH KASHYAP .....Petitioner Through: None.versusUOI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jivesh Kumar Tiwari. CGSC with CLA Ashish Bhardwaj.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 31.01.20261. None appears on behalf of the Petitioner.2. The present Petition is accordingly dismissed for non- prosecution.ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.AMIT MAHAJAN, J.JANUARY 31, 2026 jai/pal This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/02/2026 at 13:13:17...
Chief Engineer CIVL & Ors. vs R.C.Khurana
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6725/2006, W.P.(C) 6726-6728/2006, CM APPL. 5481/2006, CM APPL. 6320/2007 CHIEF ENGINEER CIVL & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: None.versusR.C.KHURANA .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 31.01.20261. The matter has been called twice.2. There is no representation on behalf of the parties, hence, the present Petition along with pending applications, is dismissed for non- prosecution.ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.AMIT MAHAJAN, J.JANUARY 31, 2026/sp/hr This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/02/2026 at 13:04:30...
Bhartiya Postal Emp Unoin & an vs U.O.I & Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3861-62/2006 BHARTIYA POSTAL EMP UNOIN & ANR .....Petitioners Through: None.versusU.O.I & ANR .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 31.01.20261. The matter has been called twice.2. There is no representation on behalf of the parties, hence, the present Petition along with pending applications, is dismissed for non- prosecution.ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.AMIT MAHAJAN, J.JANUARY 31, 2026/sp/hr This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/02/2026 at 13:02:09...
Uoi vs Sudhan Ram
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6358/2006, CM APPL. 5252/2006, CM APPL. UOI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, CGSC with Ms. Himanshi Singh, Ms. Monalisha Pradhan, Ms. Priya Advs.versusSUDHAN RAM .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 31.01.20261. The present Petition has been listed for hearing after nearly 20 years.2. None appears on behalf of the Respondent.3. Learned counsel representing the Petitioner submits thatpursuant to the order passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), the Respondent has never claimed the benefit of Grade-I Driver in the MT cadre with effect from 01.01.1996, though the said benefit was extended to the Respondent with effect from 29.07.1999. Learned counsel further prays that the present Petition may be disposed of with liberty to file an application for revival of the same in the event the Respondent raises any claim in t...
Dir.Gen. Employees State Insur vs Dr.Mrs.Reeta Mahajan
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4016-17/2006 DIR.GEN. EMPLOYEES STATE INSUR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vaibhav Manu Srivastava, Ms. Kaveri Rawal and Ms. Mallika Luthra, Advs.versusDR.MRS.REETA MAHAJAN ....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 31.01.20261. The present Petition has been filed assailing the Order dated 28.10.2005, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, PrincipalBench, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as Tribunal], whereby the orderof the Disciplinary Authority imposing penalty of withholding five increments of the Respondent without cumulative effect was set aside/quashed.2. This Petition has come up for hearing after a lapse of about 20 years.3. Learned counsel representing the Petitioner is unable to apprisethe Court as to whether the Respondent, upon attaining the age of superannuation, has demitted office or not. Upon a perusal of the list of dates and event...
HC (Dvr) Ramesh Kumar vs Commissioner of Police & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3642/2006, CM APPL. 15635/2009 HC (DVR) RAMESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: None.versusCOMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kushagra Kumar, SPC for R-1 to R-3 with Mr. ASI Devinder, Delhi PoliceCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 31.01.20261. The matter has been called twice.2. The Petitioner remains unrepresented, hence, the present Petition along with pending application, is dismissed for non- prosecution.ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.AMIT MAHAJAN, J.JANUARY 31, 2026/sp/hr This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/02/2026 at 13:02:04...
U.O.I & Ors vs Ms. Sheetal Arora
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5629/2006 & W.P.(C) 5630-5631/2006 U.O.I & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, CGSC with Ms. Himanshi Singh, Ms. Monalisha Pradhan, Ms. Priya Advs.versusMS. SHEETAL ARORA .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 31.01.20261. Learned counsel representing the Petitioners submits that thepresent Petitions have been rendered infructuous, as the services of the Respondent have already been regularized to the post of Lower Division Clerk (LDC) with effect from 31.08.2010.2. Vide the Impugned Order dated 20.12.2005, the CentralAdministrative Tribunal (CAT) had directed the Petitioners to consider the Respondent for re-appointment on ad hoc basis to the post of LDC and not to replace her with a contractual employee.3. In view of the fact that the services of the Respondent have since been regularized, the present Petitions stand dismissed as...
Uoi & Ors. vs Anita Devi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2026
$~7, 8, 16 & 17* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI(7) + W.P.(C) 6231/2006 & W.P.(C) 6232-6234/2006ANITA DEVI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Dheeraj Sharma, Adv.(8) + W.P.(C) 8959/2006 URMILA DEVI .....Petitioner(16) + W.P.(C) 15760/2006 & W.P.(C) 15761-15762/2006KASTURI DEVI .....Respondent(17) + W.P.(C) 8868/2008 BHAGWATI DEVI .....PetitionerCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 31.01.20261. Learned counsel appearing for the Respondent/Ms. Anita Devi submits that despite his best efforts, he is unable to contact the Respondent.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Union of India(UOI) submits that the present Petitions have been listed for hearing after nearly 20 years and that during the pendency of these Petitions, the Applicants, namely Ms. Anita Devi, Ms. Urmila Devi, Ms. Kasturi Devi, Ms. Bhagwati Devi, were not paid family pension on the ground that they had been granted compassionate appointments fol...
Urmila Devi vs Uoi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2026
$~7, 8, 16 & 17* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI(7) + W.P.(C) 6231/2006 & W.P.(C) 6232-6234/2006ANITA DEVI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Dheeraj Sharma, Adv.(8) + W.P.(C) 8959/2006 URMILA DEVI .....Petitioner(16) + W.P.(C) 15760/2006 & W.P.(C) 15761-15762/2006KASTURI DEVI .....Respondent(17) + W.P.(C) 8868/2008 BHAGWATI DEVI .....PetitionerCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 31.01.20261. Learned counsel appearing for the Respondent/Ms. Anita Devi submits that despite his best efforts, he is unable to contact the Respondent.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Union of India(UOI) submits that the present Petitions have been listed for hearing after nearly 20 years and that during the pendency of these Petitions, the Applicants, namely Ms. Anita Devi, Ms. Urmila Devi, Ms. Kasturi Devi, Ms. Bhagwati Devi, were not paid family pension on the ground that they had been granted compassionate appointments fol...
Afsar Pasha vs National Investigation Agency Through Its Director
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 8374/2025 AFSAR PASHA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shaikh Saipan, Ms. Prerna Mukherjee, Mr. Md. Arif Hussain & Mr. Mansoor Ali, Advocates.versusNATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, SPP for NIA with Mr. Jatin Khatri, & Mr. Vikas Walia, ASPP & Mr. Amit Rohila, Advocate.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 31.01.20261. By way of the present petition, the petitioner assails the order dated17.10.2025 passed by the learned Sessions Court, by which the petitioners application seeking custody parole for the educational needs of his daughters was dismissed.2. During the course of hearing, Ms. Prerna Mukherjee, learnedcounsel for the petitioner, submits that, in lieu of an order granting custody parole for the purposes sought, the petitioner confines his prayer to seeking an enlargement in the frequency and duration of e-mulakat, so as to enable him to attend to...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »