Chennai Court July 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Puraviyammal Vs Mani
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-01-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.07.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI in A.S(MD)SR.No.82083 of 2023 1.Puraviyammal, W/o. Vellakkannu Gounder,2. Palaniyandi, S/o. Vellakkanu Gounder, Nagaraj (Died) Anjamani (Died)3. Chinnammal, D/o. Vellakkannu Gounder,4. Pichaikkannu, W/o. Nagarasu,5. Raja, S/o. Nagarasu,6. Ragupathi, S/o. Nagarasu,7. Ramya, D/o. Nagarasu,8. Lalitha, W/o. Anjamani,9. Reshma, D/o. Anjamani, 10.Sivamanikandan, S/o.Anjamani, Pudukkottai District. ...Petitioners/Appellants Vs.1. Mani, S/o. Palaniyandi Gounder,2. Alagu , D/o. Palaniyandi Gounder,3. Chinnapponnu, D/o. Palaniyandi Gounder, W/o. Boopathi,4. Chellaiah, S/o. Sanga Gounder, Vadakattuppati, Kasavanur, Kodumbalur Chathiram Post,5. Kanagaraj, S/o. Arangasamy, No.9, Cross, Thillai Nagar, Trichy and District.6. Palanichamy, S/o. Muthazhagu Gounder, Viralur Post, Illuppur Taluk,7. Pethagounder, S/o.Chinnaiah Gounder,8. Palanivelgounder, S/o.Azhagagounder, Viralur Post, Illuppur Taluk...
Ravibharathi, Vs D.Karthikeyan,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-01-2026
in C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J and R. SAKTHIVEL, JIt is contended that the first respondent had filed a writ petition seeking permission to survey his land, and an order has also been passed. However, it is contented that after the survey, the lands had been filled, blocking free flow of a water channel, and this has affected the petitioner herein. It is further contended that the petitioner had also filed a suit, and that this fact had been suppressed before the learned Single Judge.2. In view of the statement made, leave is sought to file the appeal. Leave is granted. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and post it for admission. (C.V.K., J.) & (R.S.V., J.) sjiC.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.andR. SAKTHIVEL, J.sji in...
S. Kalipulla, Vs State of Tamilnadu represented by,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-01-2026
CMP(MD). No.8177 of 2026 CMP(MD). No.8177 of 2026 in WA(MD)SR.No.111253 of 2026C.V.KARTHIKEYAN., J.andR.SAKTHIVEL., J.Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay is condoned and the petition is allowed. Registry is directed to number the appeal if it is otherwise in order and post it for admission. [C.V.K., J.] & [R.S.V., J.] 01.07.2026 sji 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Ramachandran Vs The District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-01-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.07.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Ramachandran ... Petitioner(s) vs. 1.The District Collector Office of the District Collector, Virudhunagar. 2.The Assistant Director Rural Development Department, Panchayats and Audit Office (East), 3.The Block Development Officer 4.The President Virudhunagar District. ... Respondent(s) PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to remove the cremation ground from petitioners patta land in Virudhunagar District, Aruppukottai Panchayat Union, Puliyuran Village in survey no. 241/12 by considering the representation of the Petitioner dated 05.03.2026. For Petitioner : Ms. P.Jessi Jeeva Priya For R1to R3 : Ms.K.R.Shivashankari, Counsel for StateORDERThis Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to remove the cremation ground ...
S.Asai Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Town West
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-01-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :01.07.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Crl.MP(MD)No.12737 of 2026 in Crl.A(MD)No.580 of 2025 S.Asai ... Petitioner Vs State rep. by Inspector of Police, Crime No.1260 of 2023 ... Respondent Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS to relax the condition imposed by this Court in Crl.M.P.(MD)No. 6480 of 2025 in Crl.A.(MD)No.580 of 2025 dated 08.04.2026. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Manimaran For Respondent : Mr.V.Shathurthi Raja Government Advocate (Crl. side)ORDERThis Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.M.P.(MD)No.6480 of 2025 in Crl.A.(MD)No.580 of 2025 dated 08.04.2026, in and by which, the petitioner was directed to appear before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m.2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent submits that the petitioner has regularly complied with the condition imposed by this Court.3. Si...
The Joint 2 Sub Registrar Vs Alagu Ramalingam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-01-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 01.07.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL in WA(MD)SR.No.48522 of 2026 The Joint 2 Sub Registrar, Karaikudi Sub Registration Office, Sivagangai District. ... Petitioner/Appellant Vs Alagu Ramalingam ... Respondent/Respondent PRAYER:- This petition is filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963, to condone the delay of 86 days in preferring the above Writ 13.02.2026, pending disposal of the Main Writ Appeal. For Petitioner : Mr.S.I.Muthiah Counsel for State For Respondent : Mr.S.BalamuruganORDER(Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan, J.) This petition is filed to condone the delay of 86 days in filing the 13.02.2026.2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent, who had filed the writ petition, is present.3. In the affidavit filed in support of the petition, it has been statedthat the delay had occurred owing to the official process, and that instructions ha...
Abdulla @ Rajkumar Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-01-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 01/07/2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P(MD). No.12048 of 2026 Abdulla @ Rajkumar, ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Tamilnadu Rep., By, the Inspector of Police, Ramanathapuram District (Crime No. 86 of 2025). ... Respondent PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 86 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Venkatesh For Respondent : Mr.P.Vetrivel, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For Intervenor : Mr.K.SivabalanORDERThe petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 318(4), 351(2), 316(5) of BNS in Crime No.86 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and otheraccused had contacted the defacto complainant who is running a paddy procurement shop. The petitioner and other accused had purchased the paddy from the de-facto complaina...
Jayasurya Vs The State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-01-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 01.07.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI CRL A(MD)No.719 of 2026 Jayasurya ... Appellant Vs.1. State of Tamil Nadu, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Soolakkarai Police Station, Virudhunagar.2. The State of Tamil Nadu, The Inspector of Police, Soolakkarai Police Station, Virudhunagar.3. Subbulakshmi,Village Administrative Officer, Meesaloor, Virudhunagar. ... Respondents Appeal filed under Section 14A(ii) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, as amended by Act 1/2016, to set aside the order dated 06.06.2026 made in Crl.M.P.No. 124 of 2026 on the file of the Special Court for Trial of SC/ST (POA) Act Cases, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputtur and enlarge theappellant on bail in Crime No.129 of 2026 on the file of the 2nd respondent Police. For Appellant : Mr.R.Balakrishnan For R1 and R2 : Mr.V.Shathurthi Raja, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) For R3 : Mrs.Subbulakshi, Party...
Paul Prince S Vs The Commissioner
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-01-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 01/07/2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR S.Paul Prince ... Petitioner Vs2. The Corporation Educational Officer,Madurai District. ... Respondents PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to sanction the minimum of the time scale of pay of selection grade with effect from 17.12.2012 by applying the Government Order in G.O. Ms. No.1296 Department of Education Science and Technology dated 19.06.1982 by considering the representation dated 24.11.2022 and 16.08.2024 with all consequential benefits.For Petitioner : Mr.V.Panneer Selvam For Respondents : Mr.S.VinayakORDERThe petitioner herein, who was initially appointed as the Secondary Grade Teacher in an aided school, was subsequently selected and appointed as the Secondary Grade Teacher in Panchayat Union Middle School and continuing as such as on date....
A.Selvaraj, vs the District Revenue Officer,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-01-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Reserved on: 23.06.2026Pronounced on: 01.07.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY WP.(MD) No. 1767 of 2018 and WMP(MD) No.6139 and 1888 of 2018 N.Selvaraj ...Petitioner Vs 1.The District Revenue Officer, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai. 2.The Thasildar, Avudaiyarkovil Taluk, Pudukkottai District. 3.Selvam 4.R.Vasanth 5.R.Suganth 6.Ananthi ...Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr.G.Mohan Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.I.Pinaygash, Counsel for State of TamilNadu For R1 and R2 No Appearance For R3,4 and 6Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari to quash the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent herein dated 29.12.2017 made in Ne.Mu.No.16774/2014/D3.ORDERThe present writ petition has been filed for the issuance Writ of Certiorari to quash the impugned order dated 29.12.2017 passed by the 1st respondent in Ne.Mu. No.16774/2014/D3.2.1. The brief facts of t...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »