Ravibharathi, Vs D.Karthikeyan,

Ravibharathi, vs D.Karthikeyan,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jul 01, 2026

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1651331

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1651331
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice C.V. Karthikeyan,Honourable Mr.Justice R.Sakthivel
Decided On: Jul 01, 2026
Case Number: CMP(MD)/8090/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ravibharathi,

Respondent

D.Karthikeyan,

Excerpt

in c.v.karthikeyan, j and r. sakthivel, jit is contended that the first respondent had filed a writ petition seeking permission to survey his land, and an order has also been passed. however, it is contented that after the survey, the lands had been filled, blocking free flow of a water channel, and this has affected the petitioner herein. it is further contended that the petitioner had also filed a suit, and that this fact had been suppressed before the learned single judge.2. in view of the statement made, leave is sought to file the appeal. leave is granted. registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and post it for admission. (c.v.k., j.) & (r.s.v., j.) sjic.v.karthikeyan, j.andr. sakthivel, j.sji in

Full Judgment

in C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J and R. SAKTHIVEL, J

It is contended that the first respondent had filed a writ petition seeking permission to survey his land, and an order has also been passed. However, it is contented that after the survey, the lands had been filled, blocking free flow of a water channel, and this has affected the petitioner herein. It is further contended that the petitioner had also filed a suit, and that this fact had been suppressed before the learned Single Judge.

2. In view of the statement made, leave is sought to file the appeal. Leave is granted. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and post it for admission. (C.V.K., J.) & (R.S.V., J.) sji

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.

and

R. SAKTHIVEL, J.

sji in

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties Ravibharathi, vs D.Karthikeyan, Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice C.V. Karthikeyan,Honourable Mr.Justice ...