Chennai Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Banumathi Vs K. Mahesh
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Banumathi Petitioner(s) Vs K. Mahesh Respondent(s) PRAYER To fix a period to take up all the interim Applications to complete the trial in DVC No.22 of 2024 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate II at Tambaram. For Petitioner: Mr.P.R.UmamaheswariORDERThis Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking for a limited relief. 2.The petitioner seeks for an early disposal of all the IAs as well as main DVC. No.22 of 2024, pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate II, Tambaram.3.The petitioner is the wife and the respondent is her husband. Out of the wedlock, they have two children and the children are in the custody of the petitioner. The petitioner claims that she does not have the financial means to maintain her two children. The petitioner had initiated domestic violence proceedings against the respondent before the Judicial Magistrate II, Tambaram in DVC. No.22 of 2024. The peti...
Chetna Yogesh Sanghvi and another Vs Monil Rajesh and another
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
A.No.2379 of 2026 in O.P.No.284 of 2025 DR. A.D. MARIA CLETE, J This application has been filed accept the enclosed two documents given in the list of documents.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record.3. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this application, this application is allowed and the documents shall be received subject to proof and relevancy. 24.06.2026 vrc https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The Branch Manager Vs B.Rajeswari
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
C.M.P.No.14716 of 2026 in C.M.A.SR.No.59106 of 2026A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 296 days in re- presenting the appeal.2. The reasons adduced in theaffidavit filed in support of this petition being satisfactory, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and consequently, the delay of 296 days in re- presenting the appeal is condoned. 24.06.2026 ham Note: Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is, otherwise, in order and list the same for admission in due course. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Tvl LA GANE BROS Vs The State Tax Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY Tvl LA GANE BROS Rep. by its Proprietor, Raguraman No. 287, Asthalakshmi Nagar, 9 street, Alapakkam, Chennai - 600116 ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s)PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, Calling for the records of the Respondent relating to the Impugned order dated 10.11.2025 bearing Reference No ZD33125161348J along with the proceeding in GSTIn / 33AFXPR9569R1ZT/ 2021-22 dated 10.11.2025 and quash the same and consequentially direct the Respondent to afford an opportunity to the petitioner by remanding back the matter on the file of the Respondent for filing proper reply.Page1 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Patrick For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, Government Counsel (Tax) **********ORDERAn order dated 10.11.2025 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did n...
The Mnagement Vs K Shanmugam
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
C.M.P.No.10904 of 2026 in W.A.Sr.No.29647 of 2026 S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, J and R.SAKTHIVEL, J This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 113 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Being satisfied with the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.3. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order. (S.M.S.,J.) (R.S.V.,J.) 24-06-2026 gm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Mkce Master Franchise India Private Limited vs the Deputy State Tax Of ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHYMkce Master Franchise India Private Limited Represented by its Director Mrs. Beena Natarajan, No. 118/2A2, Near Southern Textiles, Trichy Main Road, Ranganathapuram, Sulur, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu - 641402. ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records from the file of the Respondent in impugned assessment order in GSTIN 33AAMCM4285C1ZI /2020-21 dated 10.02.2025 and Reference No.ZD330225090078H in GSTIN /ID 33AAMCM4285C1Z1 dated 10.02.2025 passed for the FY. 2020-21 and quash the same as arbitrary, erroneous on facts and violative of principles of natural justice. Page1 of 4For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Venkatesh for M/s. S. Arivazhagan For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, Government Counsel (Tax) ********ORDERAn order dated 10.02.2025 is ...
T.N.Kanagaraj (Died) 1.Murugathaal Vs Sri Krishna Traders
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
CMP No.14297 of 2026 in AS SR No.64457 of 2026C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.andK.RAJASEKAR, J.(Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan, J.) This petition has been filed seeking to accept the cause title given in the above AS SR No.64457 of 2026 filed against the judgment and decree dated 18.11.2025 passed in OS No.413 of 2019 on the file of the IV Additional District Court, Udumalpet. 2.It is contended that the sole defendant died after the decree was passed. Now his legal heirs has come forward to file the appeal. 3.Cause title is accepted. Registry to proceed further and number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order. (C.V.K.J., ) (K.R.S.J., ) sli 24.06.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Mkce Master Franchise India Private Limited vs the State Tax Officer ( ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHYMkce Master Franchise India Private Limited Represented by its Director Mrs. Beena Natarajan, No. 118/2A2, Near Southern Textiles, Trichy Main Road, Ranganathapuram, Sulur, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu - 641402. ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records from the file of the Respondent in impugned assessment order in GSTIN 33AAMCM4285C1ZI /2020-21 dated 31.01.2025 and Reference No.ZD3301253008781 in GSTIN /ID 33AAMCM4285C1Z1 dated 31.01.2025passed for the FY. 2020-21 and quash the same as arbitrary, erroneous on factsand violative of principles of natural justice. Page1 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Venkatesh for M/s. S. Arivazhagan For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, Government Counsel (Tax) ********ORDERAn order dated 31.01.2025 is a...
J.Veronica Evangelinraj vs the State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN AND THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE N. MALA AND WMP NO. 25859 OF 2026 J.Veronica Evangelinraj D/o.Late Mr.James Martin Amalraj, No.145, KGT Nagar Goparasanallur, Kattupakkam Poonamallee, Chennai- 056. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The State Of Tamil Nadu Secretary to Government Department of Revenue, Fort St. George, Chennai-09.2. The District Collector Tiruvallur District, First Floor Collectorate, Tiruvallur- 602 001.3. The Tahsildar No.5, Trunk Road, Poonamallee, Chennai- 056.4. The Commissioner Panchayat Union Poonamallee (Now Converted into Municipalty) Chennai-056. ..Respondent(s) Page1 of 5Calling for the records pertaining to the Impugned notice issued under Section 7 of the Tamilnadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 issued by Third Respondent the Learned Tahsildar, in his Proceedings in Na.Ka. No. illegal / violative of the Rights of the Ownership, Possession and Enjoyment fore- bearing t...
Lakshmi Priya M.S. Vs S.Pasupathy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Lakshmi Priya M.S. Petitioner(s) Vs S.Pasupathy Respondent(s) PRAYER To direct the Subordinate Judge, Poonamallee to complete the trial in HMOP.No.314/2023 on the file of the Honourable Court of Subordinate Judge, Poonamallee. For Petitioner(s): Mr.C.Arun KumarORDERThis Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking for a limited relief. 2.The petitioner seeks for an early disposal of HMOP. No.314 of 2023, pending on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Poonamallee. 3.The petitioner is the wife and the respondent is her husband. The petitioner filed HMOP. No.314 of 2023 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Poonamallee seeking for dissolution of her marriage with the respondent. The respondent has been set exparte by the Subordinate Judge, Poonamallee. 4.It is stated that the respondent has filed an application seeking to set aside the exparte order.5.Learned counsel for the petitioner...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »