Chennai Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Murugan Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By The Sub Inspector Of Police, M.Re ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI IN CRL RC(MD) NO. 1016 OF 20261. Murugan Petitioner(s) Vs1. State Of Tamilnadu Rep ByThe Sub Inspector Of Police, M.ReddiapattiPolice Station Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.S. Vairamuthu For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Susikumar, Govt. Adv. Prayer: C-60. to Exempt the petitioner from surrendering before the trial court in pursuance to thejudgment rendered by the learned Additional District and Sessions Court, Arupukottai inCrl.A. No. 123 of 2023 dt. 17.03.2026 by confirming the judgment of conviction passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aruppukottai made in CC No.96 of 2017 dated 27.02.2023 pending disposal of the main criminal revision petition.ORDERThe learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.2. In view of the endorsement so made, this Criminal...
SERANATHAN Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL CRL OP(MD). No. 11366 of 2026 Seranathan, S/o.Irungovel ... Petitioner Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.Not Known of 2026) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : Ms.N.Vijayalakshmi, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.N.Balasubramanian, Counsel for State of TN (Crl. side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. Not Known of 2026 on the file of the respondent police.ORDER : The Court made the following order :-When the matter is taken up for hearing the learned counsel appearing for the State of TN (Criminal Side) submits that the petition enquiry was conducted and the same has subsequently been closed.2. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the State of TN (Criminal Side), this Criminal Original Petition stands closed. (P D B J) 25.06.2026 mkn To 1.Th...
M. Palanikumar Vs The Deputy Commissioner (Appeal)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2026
and AND (Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.) This petition is filed seeking to condone the delay of 62 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. The learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 3 has not raised any serious objection to the petition being allowed.3. Accepting the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay is condoned and this petition is ordered. Registry is directed to number the writ appeal, if the papers are otherwise in order. [N.S.K., J.] & [M.J.R., J.] Page No.1/2 AND and Page No.2/2...
Ramanathan Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep.by,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-25-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 25.06.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL CRL OP(MD). No. 12340 of 2026 Ramanathan ...Petitioner Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption Wing, Ramanathapuram District. (Crime No.03 of 2026) ...Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.R.Anand for Mr.S.Ashok Advocate For Respondent : Mr.G.Ganesh Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Cr.No. 03 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police.ORDER : The Court made the following order :-The petitioner / Accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 22.05.2026, for the offences punishable under Sections 7(c) of Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018 in Crime No.03 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant wanted toexecute a sale deed in favour ...
Vanchimuthu, Vs Chellammal (Died) 1. Valliammal,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2026
C.M.P(MD).Nos.7888 and 7891 of 2026 in C.R.P(MD).SR.Nos.216 and 217 of 2026V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN,J.Being satisfied with the reason assigned in the affidavit filed in support of these petitions, these Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are ordered and the delay is condoned. 3.Registry is directed to number the civil revision petitions if they are otherwise in order and list the matter 'for admission' in the usual course. 25.06.2026 Rmk 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Syed Umar Sahib Vs The State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-25-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 25/06/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABALSyed Umar Sahib, S/o. Haja Allavudeen, R/o.9/21, Ojm Street, Keezhakkarai, Ramanathapuram District-623 517. (Now Confined at Central Prison, Madurai). ... Petitioner/Accused No.1 Vs Rep by the Intelligence Officer, Union of India, Narcotics Control Bureau, Madurai Sub Zone, Madurai. (Ncb F.No.48/01/04/2022/mdu). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.Ravi for Mr.T Balakrishnan, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.C.Arulvadivel @ Sekar Special Public ProsecutorPETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- C-32B. To enlarge the Petitioner/A1 on bail in CC.No.794 of 2023 on the file of the Learned Principal Special Court for NDPS Act Cases, Madurai.ORDER : The Court made the following order :-The petitioner/Accused No.1, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 02.11.2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 8(C) r/w 20(...
M.Kumaresan Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep.by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-25-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 25/06/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL M.Kumaresan ... Petitioner/Accused Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep.By, The Inspector of Police, Thriuppalai Police Station, Madurai District. (Cr.No.176 of 2026). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.N.Jeyaram Sidharth, For Respondent : Mr.G.Ganesh Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.176 OF 2026 on the file of the respondent Police.ORDER : The Court made the following order :-The petitioner / Accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 02.04.2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 329(4), 309(6) and 351(3) of BNS in Crime No. 176 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.2. The case of the prosecution is that on 31.03.2026 at about03.00p.m., when the defacto complainant was working in a shop namely KGN Furniture, the accused person...
Palaniammal Vs The Deputy Inspector General of Prison,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 25.06.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN W.P.(Crl.) (MD) No.3303 of 2026 and W.M.P.(MD).No.803 of 2026 Palaniammal : Petitioner (s) Vs. 1.The Deputy Inspector General of Prison, O/o.The Deputy Inspector General of Prison, And Correctional Services, Madurai.Range, Madurai Central Prison Campus, New Jail Road, Madurai. 2.The Superintendent of Prison, Madurai Central Prison 3.The Superintendent of Police, O/o. the Superintendent of Police4.The Inspector of Police, S.S.Colony Police Station, Madurai District. : Respondent(s) Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the Impugned Order in No.1818/ Thaku.2/2026 dated 10.06.2026 on the file of Respondent No. 2 and quash the same as illegal and consequently directing the second respondent to grant ordinary leave...
C. Kathiresan Vs The District Registrar (Administration)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-25-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.(MD)No.17227 of 2026 C.Kathiresan ... Petitioner Vs.Radhapuram, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certioarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned check slip issued by the second respondent in RFL/Radhapuram/33/2026 dated 08.05.2026 and quash the same as arbitrary, illegal and consequently, directing the second respondent to register the Sale Deed presented in Reference No.TP/271526035/2026 dated 08.05.2026 in respect of the property bearing Re-Survey No. Village, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District. For Petitioner : Mr.P.SaravanakumarPage No. 1 of 4 For Respondents : Mr.P.Rajagopalan Government Standing CounselORDERThis Writ Petition challenges the impugned refusal check slip, whereby the document presented by the petitioner for...
R.Raveenthran Vs The Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.06.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI R.Raveenthran ... Petitioner Vs.2. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Inspector of Police,3. The Immigration Officer, Thiruvananthapuram Airport, Thiruvananthapuram District. ... RespondentsPRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to withdraw the Look Out Circular issued against the petitioner and communicate the same to the third respondent and necessary authorities and allow the petitioner to travel abroad without any hindrance. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ranjithraja For Respondents : Mr.C.Susikumar (R1 & R2) Government Advocate (Crl.)ORDERThe learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.2. In view of the endorsement so made, this writ petition...
- ‹ Prev
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- Next ›
- Last »