Palaniammal Vs The Deputy Inspector General of Prison,

Palaniammal vs The Deputy Inspector General of Prison,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jun 25, 2026

~4 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1655009

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1655009
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh,Honourable Mr Justice K.K. Ramakrishnan
Decided On: Jun 25, 2026
Case Number: WP Crl.(MD)/3303/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Palaniammal

Respondent

The Deputy Inspector General of Prison,

Excerpt

.....to the petitioner's son, namely, suriya @ (katna suriya) @ muthumari, s/o mariyappan (convict prisoner (pid no.2965) by this court. for petitioner : mr.k.dinesh for respondents : mr.t.lenin kumar counsel for state of tamil nadu (criminal side)order[order of the court was made by n.anand venkatesh, j.] this writ petition has been filed challenging the proceedings of the second respondent made in no.1818/thaku.2/2026 dated 10.06.2026 and for a direction to the second respondent to grant 21 days ordinary leave without escort to the petitioner's son, who is presently serving sentence at central prison, madurai.2. the petitioner is the mother of the convict. the petitionersubmitted a representation seeking for 21 days ordinary leave on the ground that she is suffering from serious health issues and she requires the physical and emotional support of the convict. the representation made by the petitioner came to be rejected through the impugned proceedings dated 05.05.2026 on the ground that the petitioner's son has not undergone minimum period of three years to avail the ordinary leave. the same was put to challenge before this court and the writ petition was dismissed by granting liberty to apply for emergency leave.3. the petitioner submitted a representation dated 26.05.2026seeking for emergency leave. however, through the impugned proceedings of the second respondent dated 10.06.2026, the representation came to be rejected on the ground that the medical certificate was not annexed along with the report. aggrieved by the same, the present writ petition came to be filed before this court.4. when the matter came up for hearing during the previousoccasion, this court directed the respondents to verify the genuineness of the medical certificate that was relied upon by the petitioner. the matter was directed to be listed for hearing today.5. when the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learnedcounsel for the state of tamil nadu (criminal side).....

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 25.06.2026
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN W.P.(Crl.) (MD) No.3303 of 2026 and W.M.P.(MD).No.803 of 2026 Palaniammal : Petitioner (s) Vs. 1.The Deputy Inspector General of Prison, O/o.The Deputy Inspector General of Prison, And Correctional Services, Madurai.Range, Madurai Central Prison Campus, New Jail Road, Madurai. 2.The Superintendent of Prison, Madurai Central Prison 3.The Superintendent of Police, O/o. the Superintendent of Police
4.The Inspector of Police, S.S.Colony Police Station, Madurai District. : Respondent(s) Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the Impugned Order in No.1818/ Thaku.2/2026 dated 10.06.2026 on the file of Respondent No. 2 and quash the same as illegal and consequently directing the second respondent to grant ordinary leave without escort for the period of 21 days to the petitioner's son, namely, Suriya @ (Katna Suriya) @ Muthumari, s/o Mariyappan (Convict Prisoner (PID No.2965) by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Dinesh For Respondents : Mr.T.Lenin Kumar Counsel for State of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side)

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.] This writ petition has been filed challenging the proceedings of the second respondent made in No.1818/Thaku.2/2026 dated 10.06.2026 and for a direction to the second respondent to grant 21 days ordinary leave without escort to the petitioner's son, who is presently serving sentence at Central Prison, Madurai.

2. The petitioner is the mother of the convict. The petitioner

submitted a representation seeking for 21 days ordinary leave on the ground that she is suffering from serious health issues and she requires the physical and emotional support of the convict. The representation made by the petitioner came to be rejected through the impugned proceedings dated 05.05.2026 on the ground that the petitioner's son has not undergone minimum period of three years to avail the ordinary leave. The same was put to challenge before this Court and the writ petition was dismissed by granting liberty to apply for emergency leave.

3. The petitioner submitted a representation dated 26.05.2026

seeking for emergency leave. However, through the impugned proceedings of the second respondent dated 10.06.2026, the representation came to be rejected on the ground that the Medical Certificate was not annexed along with the report. Aggrieved by the same, the present writ petition came to be filed before this Court.

4. When the matter came up for hearing during the previous

occasion, this Court directed the respondents to verify the genuineness of the Medical Certificate that was relied upon by the petitioner. The matter was directed to be listed for hearing today.

5. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned

counsel for the State of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) placed the report of the Probation Officer and it is seen that the Probation Officer has verified the Medical Certificate and has recommended for grant of emergency leave.

6. In the light of the above development, the impugned

proceedings of the second respondent dated 10.06.2026 is quashed and there shall be a direction to the second respondent to grant six days emergency leave to the convict subject to the condition that the convict will report before the fourth respondent daily at 05.00 p.m., during the entire period of emergency leave. The sureties will be furnished by the convict before the jail authorities.

7. This writ petition (criminal) is disposed of in the above terms. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [N.A.V., J.] [K.K.R.K., J.] 25.06.2026 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No TSG

To 1.The Deputy Inspector General of Prison, O/o.The Deputy Inspector General of Prison, And Correctional Services, Madurai.Range, Madurai Central Prison Campus, New Jail Road, Madurai. 2.The Superintendent of Prison, Madurai Central Prison 3.The Superintendent of Police, O/o. the Superintendent of Police 4.The Inspector of Police, S.S.Colony Police Station, 5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.

AND

K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J.

TSG W.P.(Crl.) (MD) No.3303 of 2026 25.06.2026

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Palaniammal vs The Deputy Inspector General of Prison, Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh,Honourable Mr Justic...