Chennai Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Subbathal @ Valliammal Vs Valliammal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR Subbathal @ Valliammal ... Petitioner Vs 1.Valliammai 2.Kannaki 3.Thirumaran 4.Thiyagarajan 5.Chitra 6.Ilayaraja 7.The Tahsildar, Lalgudi Taluk, Trichy. 8.The District Collector, Trichy District, Trichy. ... Respondents Prayer : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitutionof India, to direct the learned Subordinate Judge, Lalgudi, to frame the issuesand thereafter, dispose of O.S.No.165 of 2023 within such time as may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Yogeswaran For R7 & R8 : Mr.L.Siva Government Advocate (Civil)ORDERThe civil revision petition had been filed by the petitioner seeking direction to the learned Subordinate Judge, Lalgudi, to frame issues and thereafter, dispose of O.S.No.165 of 2023 within a time frame fixed by this Court. 2.The respondents 1 to 6 filed a suit for declaration that they and the petitioner herein are the legal ...
S.Sethuraman, vs the Deputy Registrar of
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.06.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P.(MD)No.4459 of 2018 S.Sethuraman ... Petitioner -vs- 3.The President, A 2560 Kochadai Primary Agricultural Co-operative Bank, Ammachi Amman Kovil Street, Kochadai, Madurai 625 106. ... RespondentsPRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent not to take coercive steps based on surcharge proceeding No.4/08-09 dated 30.06.2009 without due process of law and order to permanently remove the hoardings based on petitioner's representation dated 31.01.2018 according to law. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kumar For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr.R.Ramasamy Counsel for the State of Tamil NaduORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Writ Petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle. 2.Reco...
The Prist Deemed to Be vs the Secretary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.06.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.4906 to 4908 of 2018 The Prist Deemed to be University, Rep. By its Registrar, Trichy Thanjavur Highway, Vallam, Thanjavur 613 403. ... Petitioner -vs- The Secretary, University Grants Commission, No.34, Ferrows Shah Road, New Delhi 1. ... Respondent PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned notification of respondent in F.No.2-4/2015 (DEB-III) New Delhi dated 06.02.2018 and the consequential impugned public notice in F.No.74-8/2017 (DEB-IV) dated 21.02.2018 quash the same insofar as Regulation 3(1) Clause (viii) of the impugned notification dated 06.02.2008 issued by the respondent and consequently direct the respondent herein to consider the application of the petitioner for grant of recognition for the programmes under the Open Distanc...
The Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, Vs Thiruguna,,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
in and This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 151 days in filing the Writ Appeal against the order dated 12.12.2025 made in W.P(MD)No. 7183 of 2025. 2.Notice had been directed and the first respondent has also filed a Caveat. Unfortunately the learned counsel for caveator/first respondent is not present. However, the learned counsel would be heard before any orders are passed in the miscellaneous petition seeking stay.3.In the affidavit filed in support of this petition, it is stated that the ordercopy had been communicated to the appellant and thereafter the consultations had to be made and necessary administrative sanction had to be obtained and there has been delay in the said process.4.Taking the above stated facts into consideration, the delay stands condoned and this petition is allowed. The Registry is directed to number the appeal if it is otherwise in order and post it for admission. When the matter is listed for admission, the name of the learned counsel...
Karunanithi Vs The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By The Inspector Of Police, ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 30/06/2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI in CRL RC(MD). No.1028 of 2026 Karunanithi ... Petitioner Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep By the Inspector of Police, Karambakudi Police Station, Pudukkottai District. (In Crime No.6 of 2013). ... Respondent PRAYER :- To suspend the sentence of Imprisonment and sentence imposed in Crl.A.No.56 of 2022 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Pudukkottai, dated 15.06.2026 by confirming the conviction and modified the sentence imposed in C.C.No.89 of 2014 on the file of the Assistant Sessions Judge / Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pudukkottai dated 08.12.2022, pending disposal of the Criminal Revision. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Rameshkumar, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.C.Susikumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to suspend the sentence of imprisonment imposed by the learned Additional District Judge, Pudukkottai in Crl.A.No.5...
Karunanithi Vs The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By The Inspector Of Police, ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 30/06/2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI in Karunanithi ... Petitioner Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep By The Inspector of Police, Karambakudi Police Station, Pudukkottai District. (In Crime No.6 of 2013). ... Respondent PRAYER :-To exempt the petitioner from surrender in pursuant to the Judgmentdated 15.06.2026 made in Crl.A.No.56 of 2022 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Pudukkottai by confirming the conviction and modified the sentence imposed in C.C.No.89 of 2014 on the file of the Assistant Sessions Judge / Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pudukkottai, dated 08.12.2022. For Petitioner : Mr. D.Rameshkumar, Advocate.For Respondent : Mr.C.Susikumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side) The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.2. In view of the endorsement so made, this Criminal Misce...
Balasubramanian G Vs The District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.06.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN G.Balasubramanian ... Petitioner /vs./ 1.The District Collector Collectorate Theni 2.The Sub Collector O/o. the Sub Collector 3.The Tahsildar Periyakulam Taluk Office 4.The Sub Registrar Registration Department Vathalagundu Sub Registrar Office Dindigul District 5.The Secretary Netrikan Nugarvor Sangam Old Periyakulam Bus Stand Theni District ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent No.4 to register the sale deed dated 11.09.2025 presented by the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Abdulkabur For R1 to R4 : Ms.P.Sudarkodi Natchiyar counsel for the State of Tamil NaduORDERHeard Mr.A.Abdulkabur learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms.P.Sudarkodi Natchiyar, learned counsel for the State of Tamil Nadu, for the respondents 1 to 4. 2.After hearing the learned counsel for the peti...
Murugan A Vs The Inspector General of Registration
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.06.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN A.Murugan ... Petitioner /vs./ 1.The Inspector General of Registration Office of the Inspector General of Registration No. 100, Santhome High Road Chennai-600028 2.The Deputy Inspector General of Registration Madurai Region Integrated Registration Department Campus Rajagambeeram Y.Othakkadai Madurai-625107 3.The District Registrar (Administration) Madurai North Registration District Madurai. 4.The Sub-Registrar Vilangudi Sub-Registrar Office Madurai District. ... RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents No.1 to 4 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 02.06.2026 and consequently rectify the erroneous index entry pertaining to Book-I, Document No.6178/2024 registered on the file of the 4th Respondent and consequently effect necessary corrections in the online Enc...
Arun @ Arunkumar Vs The State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Arun @ Arunkumar ... Petitioner Vs1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by its The Deputy Superintendent of Police2. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep, By Its, the Inspector of Police (Crime No.108 of 2026).3. Periyakaruppan ...RespondentsPRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, to direct the learned III Additional Special District and Session Judge for SC/ST Act Cases, Madurai to consider the bail application of the petitioner on the same day of his surrender itself in Criime No. 108 of 2026 on the file of the 2 nd respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Siva Kumar For Respondents : Mr.B.Arun Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1 and R2ORDERThe present petition has been filed by the second accused in Crime No.108 of 2026 on the file of the second respondent police seeking a direction as against the trial Court to consider the bail application of the petit...
Chinnathambi Vs The Presiding Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.06.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Chinnathambi ... Petitioner(s) vs. 1.The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Trichy District.2. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited, Trichirappalli Zone, Transport Department, Periyamilaguparai, Trichirappalli District.3. The Inspector of Labour, Mannarpuram, Trichy District. ... Respondent(s)PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to quash the impugned order in ID No.54/2010 dated 28.09.2021 passed by the Respondent No.1 and consequently direct the Respondent No.1 to reinstate the petitioner tohis original post of driver with consequential financial benefits as per the orderpassed by the Respondent No.3 vide Na.Ka.A/1214/2003 dated 09.01.2004 within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.M.M.Iqbal For R1 & R3 : Mr.R....
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »