Chennai Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.Ramaswami Vs P.Kanakavalli
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
C.M.P.No.8370 of 2026 in C.M.A.SR.No.45216 of 2026A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 288 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. Mr.K.Vinod, learned counsel who appeared on behalf of the third respondent, stated that he has no objection to this petition being allowed.3. Though notice has been served on respondents 1, 2 and 4 and their names are printed in the cause list, there is no representation on their behalf.4. The reasons adduced in theaffidavit filed in support of this petition being satisfactory, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and consequently, the delay of 288 days in filing the appeal is condoned, subject to the condition that the claimant/petitioner will not be entitled to interest for the delay period i.e., for 288 days, in the appeal. 24.06.2026 ham Note: Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is, otherwise, inorder and list the same for admission in duecourse. https://w...
Sivapprakasam Vs The Assistant Commissioner
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY Sivapprakasam Rep. by its Proprietor M.Sivapprakasam, 15, Sivaprakash Nagar, Ammani Kondalampatti, Salem-636 010. ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s)PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records in relation to the impugned order along with DRC 07 both bearing Reference No.ZD330125275724F dated 29.01.2025 issued by the respondent herein invoking section 73 of the Act and to quash the same as arbitrary, without jurisdiction and void and direct the respondent not to take any coercive action.For Petitioner(s): Ms.S.Uma Maheswari Page1 of 4 For Respondent(s): Ms.G.Dhana Madhri, Government Counsel (Tax) ************ORDERAn order dated 29.01.2025 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits.2...
The State Of Tamil Nadu Vs Mangai
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
C.M.P.No.7820 of 2026 in W.A.Sr.No.10908 of 2026 S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, J and R.SAKTHIVEL, J This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 122 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Being satisfied with the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.3. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order. (S.M.S.,J.) (R.S.V.,J.) 24-06-2026 gm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
S.Mahalakshmi Vs S.indiara Babu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE S.Mahalakshmi Petitioner(s) Vs S.Indiara Babu Respondent(s) PRAYER To direct the Ld Subordinate Judge, Alandur, Chengalpattu District to dispose of HMOP.No.234 of 2023 within a stipulated time frame as may be fixed by this Honble Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.PonmudiORDERThis Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking for a limited relief. 2.The petitioner seeks for an early disposal of HMOP. No.234 of 2023, pending on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Alandur, Chengalpattu District. 3.The petitioner is the wife and the respondent is her husband. The petitioner filed HMOP. No.234 of 2023 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Alandur, Chengalpattu District seeking for dissolution of her marriage with the respondent.4.According to the petitioner, the respondent was earlier set exparte in HMOP. No.234 of 2023. Thereafter, the respondent filed an application seeking to set aside th...
Chandru@Chandresh Vs The State Rep. by Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN in Crl.A.No.453 of 2026 Chandru@Chandresh S/o.Kempanna, No. 2/87A, Choodasandram, Achubalu, Krishnagiri - 635 118. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep. by Inspector of Police Thally Police Station, Thally, Krishnagiri District. Crime No. 170/2016 ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 430(1) of Cr.P.C, to suspend the sentence made in S.C.No. 30/2023 on the file of the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Denkanikottai dt. 28.04.2025 and enlarge him on bail pending disposal of the Criminal Appeal For Petitioner(s): M.Ravindhar For Respondent(s): M.Mohamed Riyaz, Govt. Advocate(Criminal Side)Page1 of 6ORDERThis Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the Petitioner/Appellant, seeking Suspension of Sentence imposed by the trial Court on the file of the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Denkanikottai in S.C.No.30 of 2023 dated 28.04.2026 for the o...
The Branch Manager Vs Thiloshma
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
CMP No.14977 of 2026 in CMA SR No.25325 of 2026C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.andK.RAJASEKAR, J.(Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan, J.) Dispensed with for the present. (C.V.K.J., ) (K.R.S.J., ) 24.06.2026 sli https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
E.Sunil Reddy Vs The Directorate Of Enforcement
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24.06.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN & WPMP Crl.No.255 of 2026 E.Sunil Reddy S/o. Late. Ella Reddy Flat No. G2, Block No. 8 Hill Ridge Springs, Gachibowli, Hyderabad - 500 032. Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Directorate Of Enforcement Represented by its Additional Director, Office of the Additional Director2. The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement Office of the Deputy Director3. The Union of India - Rep. by its Principal Secretary 3rd Floor, Jeevan Deep Building Sansad Marg, New Delhi- 110 001. Respondent(s)Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 2nd respondent provisional attachment order no.21/2025 (CEZO-I) dt. 23.12.2025 bearing F.No. ECIR/CEZO-I/30/2020 and quash the same and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Kripakaran For Respond...
Banumathi Vs K. Mahesh
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Banumathi Petitioner(s) Vs K. Mahesh Respondent(s) PRAYER To fix a period to take up all the interim Applications to complete the trial in DVC No.22 of 2024 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate II at Tambaram. For Petitioner: Mr.P.R.UmamaheswariORDERThis Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking for a limited relief. 2.The petitioner seeks for an early disposal of all the IAs as well as main DVC. No.22 of 2024, pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate II, Tambaram.3.The petitioner is the wife and the respondent is her husband. Out of the wedlock, they have two children and the children are in the custody of the petitioner. The petitioner claims that she does not have the financial means to maintain her two children. The petitioner had initiated domestic violence proceedings against the respondent before the Judicial Magistrate II, Tambaram in DVC. No.22 of 2024. The peti...
Chetna Yogesh Sanghvi and another Vs Monil Rajesh and another
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
A.No.2379 of 2026 in O.P.No.284 of 2025 DR. A.D. MARIA CLETE, J This application has been filed accept the enclosed two documents given in the list of documents.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record.3. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this application, this application is allowed and the documents shall be received subject to proof and relevancy. 24.06.2026 vrc https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The Branch Manager Vs B.Rajeswari
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
C.M.P.No.14716 of 2026 in C.M.A.SR.No.59106 of 2026A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 296 days in re- presenting the appeal.2. The reasons adduced in theaffidavit filed in support of this petition being satisfactory, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and consequently, the delay of 296 days in re- presenting the appeal is condoned. 24.06.2026 ham Note: Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is, otherwise, in order and list the same for admission in due course. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »