Chennai Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Lakshmi, vs P.S.Najeeba,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
C.M.P.(MD)No.10256 of 2016 in C.R.P.(MD)No.SR.24301 of 2016S.SOUNTHAR, J.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay is condoned and the petition is allowed.2. The Registry is directed to number the Civil Revision Petition, if it is otherwise in order and list the matter 'for admission' on 02.07.2026.3. The Registry is also directed to print the name of M/s.Ajmal Associates, at the time of admission for respondents. 29.06.2026 vsm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Mohamed Sabik Vs The Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR1. Mohamed Sabik2. M.Gowsika ... Petitioners Vs ... RespondentsPRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, to direct the respondents not to harass and unnecessarily interfere with the petitioners under the guise of enquiry in connection with the personal relationship between the petitioners by considering the petitioners representation dated 23.06.2026. For Petitioners : Mr.M.Vigneshwaran For Respondents : Mr.B.Arun Counsel for State of TN(Crl.Side)ORDERThe present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents not to harass the petitioners on the guise of enquiry. 2.The learned Counsel for State of TN (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent submits that already FIR has been registered in Cr.No.13 of 2026 against the petitioners and they would proceed in accordance with law. 3.In view of the above observations, preserving the right ...
K.Karuppasamy Vs The Managing Director
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.06.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR K.Karuppasamy ... Petitioner -vs- The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (MDU) Ltd., Bye Pass Road Madurai-625 016 ... Respondent PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to pay interest at the rate of 6% per annum to the petitioner for the belated payment of gratuity, provident fund, EL surrender salary and leave salary from the date of retirement to the date of actual payment within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Ms.D.Ramya For Respondent : Mr.P.F.Ferlin Castro Standing CounselORDERMr.P.F.Ferlin Castro, learned Standing Counsel, takes notice for the respondent Transport Corporation.2. With the consent of both sides, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage.3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learn...
Karthick Vs The State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 29/06/2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR Karthick ... Petitioner/Accused No.3 Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep By, The Inspector of Police, Devipattinam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. Cr.No.114/2026. ... Respondent/Complainant PRAYER :- For Bail in Cr.No.114 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : S.Sivaprakash, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.N.Balasubramanian, Counsel For State of TN (Crl.Side)ORDERThe petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 15.06.2026 for the alleged offence under Section 21(1) & 303(2) of BNS, 2023, in Crime No.114 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.2. The case of the prosecution is that, on 15.06.2026, at about 3.00a.m., the petitioner, along with the other accused, was allegedly engaged in the illegal quarrying of approximately 1 units of sand from a patta land by using a JCB and a tractor. Based on the said allegation...
N.V.Veerachandran Vs The Managing Director
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.06.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR N.V.Veerachandran ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Managing Director Corporation (MDU) Ltd., Bye Pass Road Madurai-625 016 2.The Administrator Corporation Employees' Pension Fund Trust Thiruvalluvar Illam Pallavan Salai, Chennai-600 002 ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pay interest at the rate of 6% per annum to the petitioner for the belated payment of gratuity, provident fund, pension commutation, EL surrender salary and leave salary from the date of retirement to the date of actual payment within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Ms.D.Ramya For Respondents : Mr.P.F.Ferlin Castro Standing Counsel for R1 Mr.S.C.Herold Singh Standing Counsel for R2ORDERMr.P.F.Ferlin Castro, learned Standing Counsel, takes notice for the first responde...
Saravana Sundar Vs The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By The Inspector Of Poli ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR1.Saravanasundar 2.P.S.S.Bagyalakshmi ...Petitioners Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Madakulam, Madurai District. (Crime No.54 of 2026) ...Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vijayakumar Advocate For Respondent : Mr.P.Vetrivel Government Advocate (Crl. Side) PRAYER :- Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Act, 2023, to modify the condition 6(b) imposed on the petitioners in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.6748 of 2026, dated 22.04.2026 and consequently direct the petitioners to appear before the respondent police as and when required instead of the daily appearance condition.ORDER : The Court made the following order :-This petition has been filed by the petitioners to modify the condition 6(b) imposed on the petitioners in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.6748 of 2026, dated 22.04.2026 and consequently direct the...
Senthil Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMARSenthil ... Petitioner Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep., By, the Inspector of Police, (Crime No. 441 of 2014). ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, to modify the condition imposed in Crl.MP. No. 1321 of 2026 dated 23.05.2026 directing the petitioner/accused to appear and sign before this Court daily at 10.30 am and 5.30 pm until disposal of the case, by permitting the petitioner to appear before the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Manikandan For Respondent : Mr.B.Arun Counsel for State of TN(Crl.Side)ORDERThe present petition has been filed by the accused person in CC No.91 of 2018 on the file of Judicial Magistrate, Bodinayakanur seeking to modify the order, dated 23.05.2026 passed in the warrant recall petition.2.In view of the non-appearance of the petitioner before the Court, the trial Court has issued non-bailable ...
Rajasekar Vs The State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 29.06.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR 1.Rajasekar 2.T.Rajeshwari ...Petitioners/Accused Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Kalligudi East Police Station, Madurai. (Crime No. 160 of 2026) ...Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : Mr.S.Baskar Mathuram Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.I.Murugesan Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No.160 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police.ORDER : The Court made the following order :-The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 324(4), 74, 351(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, r/w Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act in Crime No. 160 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.2. The case of the prosecutio...
Veera Sooran Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Thiruch ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 29.06.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP(MD). No. 12659 of 2026 Veera Sooran ...Petitioner Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Thiruchuli Police Station, Virudhunagar District. (Crime No.198 of 2026) ...Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.B.Micheal Sebastin Advocate For Respondent : Mr.N.Balasubramanian Counsel for State of TN (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Cr.No. 198 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police.ORDER : The Court made the following order :-The petitioner / Accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 19.05.2026, for the offences punishable under Section 25(1)(a) of Arms Act, in Crime No.198 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in possession of sword and he had also used the same for threatening the g...
C.Karthikeyan Vs The District Registrar (Audit)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.(MD) No.13362 of 2026 C.Karthikeyan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Registrar (Audit), Trichy District. 2.The Sub-Registrar, K.Sathanur Sub-Registrar Office, K.Sathanur, Trichy District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned notice dated 15.09.2025 in Letter No.Nil issued by the second respondent and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Mohan For Respondents : Mr.R.Parthiban Counsel for Government of Tamilnadu ****** Page No. 1 of 7ORDERThe petitioner is before this Court against the impugned communication dated 15.09.2025 issued by the second respondent, whereby the petitioner has been called upon to pay the deficit stamp duty of Rs.4,76,260/- and the deficit registration fee of Rs.1,36,615/-.2. The learned counsel ...
- ‹ Prev
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- Next ›
- Last »