Senthil Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by

Senthil vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jun 29, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1661161

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1661161
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice R.Vijayakumar
Decided On: Jun 29, 2026
Case Number: CRL OP(MD)/12729/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Senthil

Respondent

The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by

Excerpt

.....petition is filed under section 528 of bnss act, to modify the condition imposed in crl.mp. no. 1321 of 2026 dated 23.05.2026 directing the petitioner/accused to appear and sign before this court daily at 10.30 am and 5.30 pm until disposal of the case, by permitting the petitioner to appear before the respondent police. for petitioner : mr.s.manikandan for respondent : mr.b.arun counsel for state of tn(crl.side)orderthe present petition has been filed by the accused person in cc no.91 of 2018 on the file of judicial magistrate, bodinayakanur seeking to modify the order, dated 23.05.2026 passed in the warrant recall petition.2.in view of the non-appearance of the petitioner before the court, the trial court has issued non-bailable warrant. the petitioner has filed crl.mp. no. 1321 of 2026 to recall the nbw, wherein, an order was passed on 23.05.2026 directing the petitioner to appear before the court daily at 10.30 am and 05.30 p.m., till the disposal of the case.3.according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, he seeks modification of the abovesaid order on the ground that daily he has been directed to appear twice. 4.heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the materials on record. 5.if the petitioner wants any modification of the condition imposed by the trial court at the time of granting bail, it is always open to the petitioner to approach the concerned court. in such circumstances, this court is not inclined to entertain the petition. 6.with the aforesaid observations, this criminal original petition stands disposed of. ncc : yes/no index : yes/no internet: yes/no pnm to1. the judicial magistrate, bodinayakanur.2. the inspector of police, 3.the additional public prosecutor, madurai bench of madras high court, madurai.r.vijayakumar, j.pnmorder made in

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.06.2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
Senthil ... Petitioner Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep., By, the Inspector of Police, (Crime No. 441 of 2014). ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, to modify the condition imposed in Crl.MP. No. 1321 of 2026 dated 23.05.2026 directing the petitioner/accused to appear and sign before this Court daily at 10.30 am and 5.30 pm until disposal of the case, by permitting the petitioner to appear before the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Manikandan For Respondent : Mr.B.Arun Counsel for State of TN(Crl.Side)

ORDER

The present petition has been filed by the accused person in CC No.91 of 2018 on the file of Judicial Magistrate, Bodinayakanur seeking to modify the order, dated 23.05.2026 passed in the warrant recall petition.

2.In view of the non-appearance of the petitioner before the Court, the trial Court has issued non-bailable warrant. The petitioner has filed Crl.MP. No. 1321 of 2026 to recall the NBW, wherein, an order was passed on 23.05.2026 directing the petitioner to appear before the Court daily at 10.30 am and 05.30 p.m., till the disposal of the case.

3.According to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, he seeks modification of the abovesaid order on the ground that daily he has been directed to appear twice. 4.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the materials on record. 5.If the petitioner wants any modification of the condition imposed by the trial Court at the time of granting bail, it is always open to the petitioner to approach the concerned Court. In such circumstances, this Court is not inclined to entertain the petition. 6.With the aforesaid observations, this Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of. NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No PNM To

1. The Judicial Magistrate, Bodinayakanur.

2. The Inspector of Police, 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.

PNM

ORDER MADE IN

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties Senthil vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice R.Vijayakumar