Skip to content

Chennai Court June 2026 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jun 24 2026

C.S.Arulraj Vs A.Ramanujam

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-24-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED IN C.S.Arulraj S/o.Late C.D.Selvaraj, No.19/4, C Block, Manju Garden, Nesapakkam, Chennai - 600078. ..Petitioner(s) Vs Chennai - 600005. ..Respondent(s) C.S.Arulraj Appellant(s) Vs A.Ramanujam Respondent(s) CRL MP No. 6168 of 2026: To condone the delay of 137 days in filing the Criminal Revision Petition against the order dated 25.07.2025 passed in Crl.A.No.773 of 2023 on the file of the XXI Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Gajendiran For Respondent(s): Ms.S.Nivetha for M/s.R.PraburamORDERHeard Mr.K.Gajendiran, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Ms.S.Nivetha, for Mr.R.Praburam learned counsel for the Respondent. Page1 of 42. Mr. K.Gajendiran, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that thisCriminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking to condone the delay of 137 days in...


Jun 24 2026

M.Sangeetha Vs The Union of India

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-24-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL WA No. 1645 of 2026 AND CMP NO. 15112 OF 20261. M.Sangeetha2. D.Kalpana3. R.Suganya4. B.Hemalatha5. T.Kanimozhi6. Ramya K7. K.Nithyasri8. M.Dhanalakshmi9. Saranya10. E.Ezhilarasi11. K.Gowsalya12. N.Vithiya ..Appellants Vs1. The Union of India Represented By The Chief Secretary To Government, Government Of Union Territory Of Puducherry, Puducherry 605 001.2. The Secretary to Government Social Welfare Department, Government Of Union Territory Of Puducherry, Puducherry 605 001.3. The Director of Women and Child Development, Department Of Women And Child Development, Government Of Puducherry, Puducherry. Page1 of 54. The Managing Director Puducherry Corporation For The Development Of Women And Differently Abled Persons Limited, 1st Cross Rd, Natesan Nagar, Puducherry, 605005 ..Respondents Prayer : Writ Appeal under Clause XV of the Letters...


Jun 24 2026

The Manager Vs Valli

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-24-2026

CMP No.10431 of 2026 in CMA SR No.200928 of 2025C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.andK.RAJASEKAR, J.(Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan, J.) This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 21 days in filing the appeal against the order dated 16.07.2025 passed in MCOP No.951 of 2018 on the file of the MACT Additional District Judge, FTC, Kancheepuram. 2.Notice had been directed to the respondents, notice had been served and proof affidavit had also been filed. But there is no appearance for the respondents. 3.It had been stated that owing to administrative reasons, there has been a delay of 21 days. 4.In view of the reasons stated, the delay stands condoned. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order. (C.V.K.J., ) (K.R.S.J., ) sli 24.06.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...


Jun 24 2026

V.MARIYAPPAN Vs The District Collector

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-24-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN CMP No.8151 of 2026 in WA SR No.43695 of 20261. V.Mariyappan S/O.Vediyappan, Residing At Pappisettipatti Village, Kallavi Post, Uthangarai Taluk, Krishnagiri District. Appellant(s) Vs1. The District CollectorKrishnagiri District, Krishnagiri. And 7 others Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Mr.S.Subramaniya For Respondent(s):Mr.A.Tamilarasan for R5 Mr.L.Ramu for R6 Ms.G.Kaviya for R7 and R8 The Honble Chief Justice andG.Arul Murugan, J.ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the respondents.2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 50 days in filing the appeal papers.3. There being no objection for the condoning the delay and taking into consideration the short period of delay and the cause shown, we are inclined to...


Jun 24 2026

C.S.Arulraj Vs A.Ramanujam

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-24-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED in C.S.Arulraj S/o.Late C.D.Selvaraj, No.19/4, C Block, Manju Garden, Nesapakkam, Chennai - 600 078. ..Petitioner(s) Vs A.Ramanujam ..Respondent(s) To condone the delay of 137 days in filing the Criminal Revision Petition against the order dated 25.07.2025 passed in Crl.A.No.774 of 2023 on the file of the XXI Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Gajendiran For Respondent(s): Ms.S.Nivetha for Mr.R.PraburamORDERHeard Mr.K.Gajendiran, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Ms.S.Nivetha, for Mr.R.Praburam learned counsel for the Respondent. Page1 of 42. Mr. K.Gajendiran, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that thisCriminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking to condone the delay of 137 days in filing the criminal revision petition. 3.In compliance of the order, dated 18.06.202...


Jun 24 2026

Azhagan Vs Rani

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-24-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN CMP No.8212 of 2026 in WA SR No.1280 of 20261. Azhagan S/o. Perumal, No.113, Main Road, Kavulpalayam Village, Perambalur Taluk, Perambalur District. Appellant(s) Vs1. Rani W/o. Annadurai, Kavulpalayam Village, Perambalur Taluk, Perambalur District. And 3 others Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Mr.D.Ananth For Respondent(s):Mr.S.Selvakumar for R1 and R2 The Honble Chief Justice andG.Arul Murugan, J.ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2.2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 6 days in filing the appeal papers.3. Taking into consideration the short period of delay and the cause shown, we are inclined to condone the delay.4. Accordingly, the delay is condoned and the application isallowed. Re...


Jun 24 2026

C.S.Arulraj Vs A.Ramanujam

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-24-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED IN C.S.Arulraj S/o.Late C.D.Selvaraj, No.19/4, C Block, Manju Garden, Nesapakkam, Chennai - 600078. ..Petitioner(s) Vs A.Ramanujam S/o.Arumugam, No.27, P.M.Dargha Main Street, Dr.Natesan Road, Lloyd Road, Chennai - 600005. ..Respondent(s) C.S.Arulraj Appellant(s) Vs A.Ramanujam Respondent(s) To condone the delay of 137 days in fling the Criminal Revision Petition against the order dated 25.07.2025 passed in Crl.A.No.772 of 2023 on the file of the XXI Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): M/s.K.Gajendiran M.Nihal Ahemmed Affidavit Of Service Filed Page1 of 5 For Respondent(s): M/s.R.Praburam-MS/673/1996 D.Elizabeth-MS/758/2006 S.Nivetha M.YaswanthORDERHeard Mr.K.Gajendiran, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Ms.S.Nivetha, for Mr.R.Praburam learned counsel for the Respondent.2. Mr. K.Gajendiran, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits ...


Jun 24 2026

K.Ramaswami Vs P.Kanakavalli

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-24-2026

C.M.P.No.8370 of 2026 in C.M.A.SR.No.45216 of 2026A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 288 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. Mr.K.Vinod, learned counsel who appeared on behalf of the third respondent, stated that he has no objection to this petition being allowed.3. Though notice has been served on respondents 1, 2 and 4 and their names are printed in the cause list, there is no representation on their behalf.4. The reasons adduced in theaffidavit filed in support of this petition being satisfactory, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and consequently, the delay of 288 days in filing the appeal is condoned, subject to the condition that the claimant/petitioner will not be entitled to interest for the delay period i.e., for 288 days, in the appeal. 24.06.2026 ham Note: Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is, otherwise, inorder and list the same for admission in duecourse. https://w...


Jun 24 2026

Sivapprakasam Vs The Assistant Commissioner

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-24-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY Sivapprakasam Rep. by its Proprietor M.Sivapprakasam, 15, Sivaprakash Nagar, Ammani Kondalampatti, Salem-636 010. ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s)PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records in relation to the impugned order along with DRC 07 both bearing Reference No.ZD330125275724F dated 29.01.2025 issued by the respondent herein invoking section 73 of the Act and to quash the same as arbitrary, without jurisdiction and void and direct the respondent not to take any coercive action.For Petitioner(s): Ms.S.Uma Maheswari Page1 of 4 For Respondent(s): Ms.G.Dhana Madhri, Government Counsel (Tax) ************ORDERAn order dated 29.01.2025 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits.2...


Jun 24 2026

The State Of Tamil Nadu Vs Mangai

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-24-2026

C.M.P.No.7820 of 2026 in W.A.Sr.No.10908 of 2026 S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, J and R.SAKTHIVEL, J This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 122 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Being satisfied with the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.3. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order. (S.M.S.,J.) (R.S.V.,J.) 24-06-2026 gm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial