The State of Tamil Nadu, Vs Karthick,

The State of Tamil Nadu, vs Karthick,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jun 30, 2026

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1649945

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1649945
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice C.V. Karthikeyan,Honourable Mr.Justice R.Sakthivel
Decided On: Jun 30, 2026
Case Number: CMP(MD)/7241/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The State of Tamil Nadu,

Respondent

Karthick,

Excerpt

in and this petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 181 days in filing the writ appeal against the order dated 24.10.2025 made in w.p(md).no. 26336 of 2025. 2.in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, it is stated that matter had been referred to higher officials for obtaining opinion. thereafter, administrative sanction had to be obtained for filing an appeal and there has been delay in the said process. 3.notice had been directed and notice was served. the learned counsel entered appearance for the respondent. the learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the respondent had filed a contempt petition. 4.at any rate, the learned counsel for the respondent will also be heard when the appeal comes up for admission. accordingly, the delay stands condoned and this petition is allowed. the registry is directed to number the appeal if it is otherwise in order and post it for admission. (c.v.k.,j) & (r.s.v.,j) gns and gns in

Full Judgment

in and This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 181 days in filing the Writ Appeal against the order dated 24.10.2025 made in W.P(MD).No. 26336 of 2025. 2.In the affidavit filed in support of this petition, it is stated that matter had been referred to higher officials for obtaining opinion. Thereafter, administrative sanction had to be obtained for filing an appeal and there has been delay in the said process. 3.Notice had been directed and notice was served. The learned counsel entered appearance for the respondent. The learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the respondent had filed a contempt petition. 4.At any rate, the learned counsel for the respondent will also be heard when the appeal comes up for admission. Accordingly, the delay stands condoned and this petition is allowed. The Registry is directed to number the appeal if it is otherwise in order and post it for admission. (C.V.K.,J) & (R.S.V.,J) gns and gns in

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties The State of Tamil Nadu, vs Karthick, Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice C.V. Karthikeyan,Honourable Mr.Justice ...