Chennai Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/s. Sarveswaran Enterprises Vs The Chairman cum Managing Director
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTCORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P(MD)Nos.18325 and 18329 of 2022 M/s.Sarveswaran Enterprises Rep. through its Partner, Koteeswaran ... Petitioner(s) vs.5.Mr. S. Yogaraj. ... Respondent(s) PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to calling for the records of the 3rd respondent pertaining to the tender summary reports (Rejection Order) dated 07.10.2022 derived through e-tender of the Labour Contract under specification no. CE/TTPS/SE/M-II /No. 237/2022-2023 and quash it as illegal and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to treat the petitioners tender as one fulfilled with the conditions of Bid Qualification on account of the payment of EPF, ESI etc, pending with 3rd respondent and give work order. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai for Mr.K.K.SamyFor R1 to R4 : Mr.Anand Gopalan for M/s.T.S.Gopalan and Co. For R5 : Mr....
Parthasarthy vs Vallimayil
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR Parthasarathy .. Petitioner Vs. 1.Vallimayil 2.Shanmugapriya 3.Sundar Natarajan (died) 4.Babu @ Balasubramanian 5.Manjula Devi (cause title is accepted vide order dated 09.11.2017) .. Respondents PRAYER in C.M.P(MD)No.11013 of 2017: Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 22 days in filing the civil revision petition.PRAYER in C.R.P.(MD)No.SR 43354 of 2017: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the fair and executable order dated 21.06.2017 passed in the application to condone the delay in filing the set aside petition in I.A.No.545 of 2016 in O.S.No.629 of 2011 on the file of the II Additional Subordinate Court, Madurai. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Barathan For Respondents : Mr.R.G.Shankar Ganesh for R1 and R3 No appearance for R4R2 and R5 dismissed vide orderdated 15.0...
Kannan vs the Managing Director
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P(MD)Nos.14852 & 14853 of 2016 Kannan ... Petitioner Vs 3.D.J.Kennedy, Taluk Cable Operator, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Limited, GDR Vision, Sathankulam Taluk, Thoothukudi District. ... RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pursuant to the impugned order of the 1st respondent vide proceedings in A.D11/1291/2015 dated 10.02.2016 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the 1st and 2nd respondents not to extend the lease period of the 3rd respondent as TCO for Sathankulam Taluk beyond the stipulated period of one year granted as per the impugned allotment order made by the first respondent in favour of the third respondent in his proceedings in A.D11/1291/2015, dated 10.02.2016.For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Ms.J.R.Anni...
Gnanambal Ammal vs Ganesa Udayar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR Gnanambal Ammal ... Petitioner Vs 1.Ganesa Udayar Ayemanickathammal (Died) 2.Valliappa Ammal 3.Ramamirtham Ammal 4.Manimekalai R.Pandian (Died) 5.R.Rajendran 6.R.Kalavathi 7.R.Kumar 8.R.Parthiban 9.R.Mala 10.R.Arumugam 11.Chandra 12.Prabaharan 13.Sathish ... Respondents Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, to condone the delay of 514 days in filing the above C.R.P. Prayer in C.R.P(MD).No.SR9876 of 2017: To set aside the judgment and decree passed in C.M.A.No.46 of 2010 on the file of the II Additional District Court, Thanjavur, dated 06.04.2015 which was reversed in S.O.P.No. 54 of 1999 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Thanjavur, dated 29.03.2010 and allow the civil revision petition.ORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement ...
G. Babu Jeyaraman(Died) vs R. Babu Venkatesan(Died)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR G.Babu Jayaraman (deceased) V.Rajalakshmi (deceased) 1.Babu Chandrasekaran 2.Jeyendra Finance a Registered Partnership Firm by its Partner, G.Babu Chandrasekaran S/o Babu Gopal Savithiri Nilayam, No.98, Butter Worth Road, Trichy 2.3.Thiriburasundari 4.G.Ranjani Gowrisankar 5.J.Babu Sundaresan .. Petitioners Vs. R.Babu Venkatesan (deceased) 1.Babu Janakiraman S.Babu Raman (deceased) 2.S.Babu Krishnan 3.S.Babu Ganesan 4.S.Babu Narayanan 5.S.Meenakshi 6.S.Kamakshi 7.S.Jayalakshmi 8.Girija 9.Namagri Lakshmi 10.Bhuvaneswari N.B.Ananthakrishnan (died) N.B.Sriram (died) 11.N.B.Lakshmanan 12.Jaya Maheswari 13.R.Mangaleshwari 14.B.Sampoornalakshmi Jayalakshmi ammal (died) 15.Durgalakshmi 16.Savithiri @ Kalpana 17.Indira 18.Rama 19.Ravichandran Krishnamoorthy @ Krishnanji (deceased)20.Saraswathi 21.R.Venkataraman 22.R.Shantha 23.Suresh 24.Babu Anandh 25.Subhashree 26.Janaki 27.Viswanathan...
Dr.William Jebes Bensam, vs the Commissioner
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P(MD)No.17301 of 2017 William Jebes Bensam ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Commissioner, 2.Deputy Director, Kanyakumari Division, Tirunelveli. 3.The District Collector, Collectorate, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 4.The Member Secretary, Local Town Planning Officer, Raman Pillai Street, Nagercoil, 5.The Municipal Commissioner, Nagercoil Municipality, Nagercoil,6.A.Vins Anto 7.Dr.Jasmine Asir 8.Ganapathia Pillai 9.C.Mary Janet 10.V.Vincent Jeyaseelan 11.Mary Augustine 12.Jacob Soundararajan 13.A.Shaji 14.Aliee Janet 15.V.K.Madhusoothanan 16.Sulochana 17.Premkumar 18.Suresh Moorthy ... Respondents (R6 to R18 are impleaded vide order dated 10.09.2025 in W.M.P(MD)No.14330 of 2019) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondent No.5 from evicting the petitioner or demolishing the petitioner's buildin...
M. Sheik Mansoor, vs the District Collector,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P(MD)Nos.20192 of 2017 & 5589 of 2018 M.Sheik Mansoor ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, District Collectorate Office, 2.The Ottapidaram Panchayat Union Council, Represented by its Special Officer/block Development Officer, Ottapidaram Panchayat Union, Ottapidaram Village, Ottapidaram Taluk, 3.M/s.Suzlan Gujarat Wind Park Limited, No.5, Shrimali Society, Near Shree Krishna Complex, Navrungpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat - 380 009. 4.The Secretary to the Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, St. George Fort, Chennai. 5.The Chief Engineer, Non Conventional Energy Sources, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Annasalai, Chennai. 6.The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Energy Department, 7.The Principal Secretary to Government, Rural Development Panchayat Raj Department, Fort St. George, Chennai. ... Respondents(R4 to...
Kaleeswaran Vs The state of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :30.06.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Crl.M.P.(MD)No.13495 of 2024 in Crl.A.(MD)No.1087 of 2024 Kaleeswaran ... Petitioner Vs. The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Thondi Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. Crime No.11/2020 ... Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Section 430(1) of BNSS to suspend the sentence of imprisonment imposed by the learned Fast Track Mahila Court, (Mahaleer Neethimandram), Ramanathapuram in Spl.S.C.No.29 of 2020, dated 23.11.2023 and enlarge the petitioner / appellant on bail, pending disposal of the above criminal appeal. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Karthick For Respondent : Mrs.V.Moushica, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThe petitioner, sole accused in Spl.S.C.No.29 of 2020, on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, (Mahaleer Neethimandram), Ramanathapuram was found guilty by the trial Court and was convicted and sentenced as under:-Sl.No Sectio...
M.Prasath Vs The State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :30.06.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Crl.M.P.(MD)No.14328 of 2025 in Crl.A.(MD)No.1095 of 2025 M.Prasath ... Petitioner Vs. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thirukattipalli Police Station, Thanjavur District. Crime No.274/2024 ... Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Section 430 of BNSS to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner in C.C.No.148 of 2024 on the file of the learned Additional District Judge / Presiding Officer, Special Court under Essential Commodities Act, Thanjavur and enlarge the petitioner on bail, pending disposal of the Criminal Appeal. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Mani Maran For Respondent : Mrs.V.Moushica, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThe petitioner, an accused in C.C.No.148 of 2024, on the file of the learned Additional District Judge / Presiding Officer, Special Court under Essential Commodities Act, Thanjavur was found guilty by the trial Court and was convicted and sentenced as ...
Singaravelu Vs Veeraiah (Since Died), Meenakshi (Since Died) 1. Raja @ ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
C.M.P.(MD) No.18284 of 2025 in S.A.(MD)No.309 of 2014K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.The above petition has been filed seeking orders to bring on record the petitioners / appellants 1 and 2 as legal representatives of the deceased third appellant in the above appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel on either side. Records perused.3. Considering the reasons assigned, this petition is ordered and the Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in the main papers. 30.06.2026 (1/5) csm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »