Parthasarthy vs Vallimayil

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jun 30, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1668586

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1668586
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice S. Sounthar
Decided On: Jun 30, 2026
Case Number: CMP(MD)/11013/2017

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Parthasarthy

Respondent

Vallimayil

Excerpt

before the madurai bench of madras high court dated: 30.06.2026coramthe hon'ble mr. justice s.sounthar parthasarathy .. petitioner vs. 1.vallimayil 2.shanmugapriya 3.sundar natarajan (died) 4.babu @ balasubramanian 5.manjula devi (cause title is accepted vide order dated 09.11.2017) .. respondents prayer in c.m.p(md)no.11013 of 2017: civil miscellaneous petition is filed under section 5 of the limitation act to condone the delay of 22 days in filing the civil revision petition.prayer in c.r.p.(md)no.sr 43354 of 2017: civil revision petition is filed under section 115 of the code of civil procedure to set aside the fair and executable order dated 21.06.2017 passed in the application to condone the delay in filing the set aside petition in i.a.no.545 of 2016 in o.s.no.629 of 2011 on the file of the ii additional subordinate court, madurai. for petitioner : mr.j.barathan for respondents : mr.r.g.shankar ganesh for r1 and r3 no appearance for r4r2 and r5 dismissed vide orderdated 15.03.2024 *****orderwhen the matter was taken up for hearing on 29.06.2026, the learned counsel for the petitioner made an endorsement in the court bundle that the papers were handed over to the petitioner with the consent vakalat. accordingly, the registry was directed to list the matter today under the caption “for dismissal” by printing the name of the petitioner. 2.when the matter is called today, there is no representation for the petitioner. hence, this civil miscellaneous petition is dismissed. consequently, the civil revision petition is rejected at the sr stage. no costs. index :yes / no internet :yes / no ncc :yes / no skn to 1.the ii additional subordinate court, madurai. 2.the section officer, vr section, madurai bench of madras high court, madurai.s.sounthar, j.skn

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.06.2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR Parthasarathy .. Petitioner Vs. 1.Vallimayil 2.Shanmugapriya 3.Sundar Natarajan (died) 4.Babu @ Balasubramanian 5.Manjula Devi (cause title is accepted vide order dated 09.11.2017) .. Respondents PRAYER in C.M.P(MD)No.11013 of 2017: Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 22 days in filing the civil revision petition.
PRAYER in C.R.P.(MD)No.SR 43354 of 2017: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the fair and executable order dated 21.06.2017 passed in the application to condone the delay in filing the set aside petition in I.A.No.545 of 2016 in O.S.No.629 of 2011 on the file of the II Additional Subordinate Court, Madurai. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Barathan For Respondents : Mr.R.G.Shankar Ganesh for R1 and R3 No appearance for R4

R2 and R5 dismissed vide order

dated 15.03.2024 *****

ORDER

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 29.06.2026, the learned counsel for the petitioner made an endorsement in the Court bundle that the papers were handed over to the petitioner with the consent Vakalat. Accordingly, the Registry was directed to list the matter today under the caption “For Dismissal” by printing the name of the petitioner. 2.When the matter is called today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. Consequently, the Civil Revision Petition is rejected at the SR stage. No costs. Index :Yes / No Internet :Yes / No NCC :Yes / No skn To 1.The II Additional Subordinate Court, Madurai. 2.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

S.SOUNTHAR, J.

skn

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties Parthasarthy vs Vallimayil Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice S. Sounthar