Chennai Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Praveen. R vs Union of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-05-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN W.P.No. 11055 of 2026 and WMP No.12007 of 2026 Praveen. R, S/o. Ravi ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. Union Of India Rep. by its Secretary to Government (Revenue) Government Puducherry2. The Secretary To Government -Cum- Controller of Examinations Puducherry Examining Authority,3. The Deputy Collector, Revenue Department (South) Villianur, Pondicherry. Page1 of 54. The Tahsildar, -cum- Executive Magistrate, Villianur Pondicherry.5. The Special Officer (Police) Police Department Government of Puducherry Puducherry. ..Respondent(s)Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus Calling for the records of the 4th respondent pertaining to the proceedings in No. 1023/TOV/A3/Certificates / 2026 dated 26.02.2026 and the consequential order passed by the 3rd respondent in proceedings...
Manikandan Vs The State through
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: May-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 29.05.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL Manikandan ...Petitioner Vs. State rep. by the Inspector of Police, (Crime No.160 of 2026). ...Respondent Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, seeking to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.160 of 2026, pending on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Balachandran For Respondent : Mr.A.Amarnath, Government Advocate (Criminal Side)ORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He also circulated a letter dated 27.05.2026 to the Registry of this Court to that effect. An endorsement to the said effect was also made by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the petition today. Page No.1 of 2MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.skt2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this criminal original petition stands dismissed as wi...
Jamuna Transport Corporation Limited Vs The State Tax Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-05-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN AND WMP NO. 21475 OF 2026, WMP NO. 21478 OF 2026 Jamuna Transport Corporation Limited Represented by its Manager R.Shiv Shankar, Tiruvallur, Tamil Nadu,600 123. ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s)Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the impugned order reference number GST No.33AAACJ6665R1ZY/2021-22 dated 27.12.2025 along with its summary order under section 73 of TNGST/CGST Act, 2017 issued vide FORM DRC-07 Ref. No. ZD3312254131026 dated 27.12.2025 for the financial year 2021-2022 passed by the respondent and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and devoid of merits and against the principles of natural justice and other applicable law and further direct the respondent to permit the petitioner to submit the necessary additional documents for the financial year 2021-2022 and ...
Boopathi Vs The State rep by Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ Boopathi S/o Seenivasan, Devankatsteet, Vanavasi, Mettur Taluk, Salem District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State rep by Inspector of Police Nangavalli Police Station, Salem District. (Crime No.65 of 2026)Salem ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under To order enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr.No.65 of 2026 on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner(s): Mr. C.Deepakkumar For Respondent(s): Mr. A.Amarnath, Government Advocate (crl.Side)ORDERToday, the case is listed under the caption ''for being mentioned'' at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner.2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for petitioner that the CriminalOriginal Petition was disposed of vide order dated 29.05.2026 and requested that the name of the satisfaction Court is Judicial Magistrate-I, Mettur and that the same may be corrected in paragraph No.4 and...
M/s.PG 14 Gobi Taluk Jally and Stone Workers, Vs The Assistant Commiss ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-05-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN AND WMP NO. 21214 OF 2026 M/s.PG 14 Gobi Taluk Jally and Stone Workers, Cooperative Society Ltd., Represented by its Secretary, 0/2/417, Malaiyapalaiyam Road,Bommiamman Koil, Olalakovil, Gobichettipalayam, Erode District - 638 460. ..Petitioners Vs ..Respondent(s) Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to call for the records of the impugned order dated 23.02.2026 in DRC-07 vide Ref. No.ZD330226198994U passed by the respondent and quash the same as arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice and total inconformity with the provisions of the GST Act, 2017. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Vasanthanayagan K For Respondent(s): Ms.Amirta Poongodi Dinakaran Page1 of 4ORDERHeard both sides.2. The writ petitioner challenges the impugned assessment orderwhereby GST has been levied on royalty and seigniorage charges payable on account of the writ petitioner...
Chinnakannal @ Lakshmi vs Harihara Sudhakumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: May-27-2026
WMP.No.16837 of 2026 in Rev.Aplw.Sr.No.56184 of 2026 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J AND MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 601 days in filing the above review application.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is allowed and the delay of 601 days is condoned.4. Registry is directed to number the review application, if it is otherwise inorder.[G.R.S, J.] [M.S.Q, J.] 27.05.2026 gpa/mp 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
A.Thiyagaraja Bharathi Vs M/s.Aditya Birla Capital Limited
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-05-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN and W.M.P.Nos.17152 & 17153 of 2026 A.Thiyagaraja Bharathi ..Petitioner Vs1. M/s.Aditya Birla Capital Limited (Formerly known as M/s.Aditya Birla Finance Limited, Through its Authorized officer, Mr.Palani Kandaswamy2. M/s.P.R.S.Tex,Rep. by its Proprietor Arthanarisamy Amirthalingam, No.12, Ramasamy Street, Palliapalayam, Namakkal District-638 006 Also at No.4-196, Chennimalai Road, Meignapuram, Moorthireddipalayam, Kangeyam-638 701, Tiruppur District.3. Arthanarisamy Amirthalingam S/o.Arthanarisamy, No.15, Kanni Mariyamman Koil Veedhi, Devangapuram, Pallipalayam, Komarapalayam Taluk-638 006 Namakkal District. ..Respondent(s)Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to call for the entire records relating to the impugned order made in Crl. M.P. No.261 of 2026 dated 11.03.2026 on the ...
M/S.Maquina Technologies Vs Deputy State Tax Officer 1
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-05-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN AND WMP Nos. 20273, 20274 & 20277 of 2026 M/S.Maquina Technologies (Represented by its Proprietor MRS.Celin CM), No. 7, Ganeshar Street, Subbanayakanpudur,Udayampalayam, Chinnavedampatti, Coimbatore - 641049. ..Petitioner Vs2. The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC)..Respondent(s) Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to call for the records in the impugned order passed by the first Respondent in form GST DRC 07 vide Order Ref No.33AWCPC0642C1ZH dated along with its accompanying detailed order, both dated 18.11.2025 and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.G.Jayasuriya For RR 1 and 2: Ms.Amirta Poongodi Dinakaran Page1 of 4ORDERHeard both sides.2. The petitioner had suffered the impugned order at the hands of thefirst respondent. It is an ex parte order. The petitioner states that since notice was served only through on-line portal, the petition...
The State of Tamil Nadu Vs B.Senthilkumar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved On: Pronounced On: 04.02.2026 27.05.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN W.A.Nos.1360 & 1364 of 2024, 697, 1181, 1187, 1192, 1194 to 1197, 1199, 1202, 1546 & 3763 of 2025 and 343 to 345 of 2026 and C.M.P.Nos.9802 & 9812 of 2024, 5883 of 2025, 9078 of 2025, 9115 of 2025, 9141 of 2025, 9151 of 2025, 9150 of 2025, 9152 of 2025, 9156 of 2025, 9187 of 2025, 9194 of 2025, 11815 of 2025, 31077 of 2025, 18936 of 2025, 2985 of 2026, 2983 of 2026, 2984 of 2026W.A.No.1360 of 2024: 1 The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by its Principal Secretary to Government Higher Education Department Secretariat Fort St.George Chennai - 600 009. 2 The Director Of Collegiate Education Saidapet Chennai- 600 015. .. Appellants Vs. 1 B.Senthilkumar S/o.Beeman Guest Lecturer Department of Computer Science Government Arts and Science College Ooty The Nilgiris Dist. 2 G Thirugnanasambandan S/o.Gurumale...
Vinoth Kumar Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep. by The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-05-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ CRL MP NOS.8575 and 8576 of 2026 in CRL RC No.1074 of 2026 Vinoth Kumar ... Petitioner Vs State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by, The Inspector of Police, TIW East Police Station, Coimbatore District. (Crime No.760 of 2015) ... RespondentPrayer in Crl.M.P.No.8575 of 2026: To suspend the sentence imposed upon the petitioner vide judgment dated 24.02.2026 in Crl.A.No.213 of 2023 on the file of the Learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, confirming the judgment dated 15.06.2023 passed in C.C.No.24 of 2016 on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate No.8, Coimbatore, pending disposal of the above criminal revision.Prayer in Crl.M.P.No.8576 of 2026: To exempt the petitioner from surrender before the Trial Court pursuant to the judgment dated 24.02.2026 in Crl.A.No.213 of 2023 on the file of the Learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, confirming the ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »