Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Manikandan Vs The State through

Manikandan vs The State through

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided May 29, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1437666

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL OP/9682/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Manikandan

Respondent

The State through

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 29.05.2026coramthe honourable mr.justice p.dhanabal manikandan ...petitioner vs. state rep. by the inspector of police, (crime no.160 of 2026). ...respondent criminal original petition filed under section 483 of bnss, seeking to enlarge the petitioner on bail in crime no.160 of 2026, pending on the file of the respondent police. for petitioner : mr.t.balachandran for respondent : mr.a.amarnath, government advocate (criminal side)orderwhen the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this court to withdraw this petition. he also circulated a letter dated 27.05.2026 to the registry of this court to that effect. an endorsement to the said effect was also made by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the petition today. page no.1 of 2mohammed shaffiq, j.skt2. in view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this criminal original petition stands dismissed as ‘withdrawn’. 29.05.2026 skt to:1. the judicial magistrate, vandavasi, tiruvannamalai district.2. the superintendent, central prison, vellore.3. the inspector of police,4. the public prosecutor, high court, madras. page no.2 of 2

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 29.05.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL Manikandan ...Petitioner Vs. State rep. by the Inspector of Police, (Crime No.160 of 2026). ...Respondent Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, seeking to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.160 of 2026, pending on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Balachandran For Respondent : Mr.A.Amarnath, Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

ORDER

When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He also circulated a letter dated 27.05.2026 to the Registry of this Court to that effect. An endorsement to the said effect was also made by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the petition today. Page No.1 of 2

MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.

skt

2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this criminal original petition stands dismissed as ‘withdrawn’. 29.05.2026 skt To:

1. The Judicial Magistrate, Vandavasi, Tiruvannamalai District.

2. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Vellore.

3. The Inspector of Police,

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Page No.2 of 2

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial