Chennai Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.Samson Babuji Vs P.Amudha, IAS and 3 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
Sub Applications (OS) No.282 of 2026 in Cont.P.Dr.No.5283 of 2026M.DHANDAPANI, J.This Sub Application has been filed to grant leave to the applicant/petitioner to file the Contempt Petition in D.No.5283 of 2026.2. Satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, leave is granted to the petitioner and this sub application is allowed as prayed for. 27.02.2026 vm Note: Registry is directed to number Cont.P.Dr.No.5283 of 2026, if it is otherwise in order. Page No.1 of 1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
K.Indhira Vs K.Selvam
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI K.Indhira ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Contemnor(s) Prayer: This contempt petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, seeking to punish the respondent herein for their act of wilful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 23.04.2025 in W.P. No.9008 of 2021. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Dhanasekar For Contemnor(s): Mr.K.RajaORDERThis Contempt Petition has been filed seeking to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the order dated 23.04.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.9008 of 2021.2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent submitted that, the order under contempt Page1 of 3 has been complied with.3. Recording the above submission made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent, this Contempt Petition stands closed. Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation...
Jayalakshmi Vs Rangarajan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA Jayalakshmi ..Petitioner(s) Vs Rangarajan The Revenue Division Officer South Chennai Range, Guindy, Chennai- 32. ..Contemnor(s) Prayer: This Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act praying to punish the respondent for the wilful disobedience of theorder dated 12.02.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.4594 of 2025.For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Thenrajan For Contemnor(s): Ms.R.L.Karthika, Government AdvocateOrderThe Contempt Petition has been filed seeking to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.4594 of 2025 dated 12.02.2025. Page1 of 32. It is informed that the orders of this Court in W.P.No.4594 of 2025 dated 12.02.2025 has been complied with by way of the proceedings of the respondent dated 12.02.2026.3. Recording the above statement, the contempt petition is closed. Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking order...
R.SENTHILKUMAR Vs The State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI And W.M.P.Nos.4263 and 4270 of 2026 1.R.Selthilkumar 2.P.Kalia Perumal 3.M.Shanmugavel 4.R.Murugasan ... Petitioners in W.P.3841/2026 1.P.Sangapillai 2.D.Kumar 3.P.Kesavan 4.P.Balasubramanian ... Petitioners in W.P.3854/2026 Vs.1 The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Environment, Climate Change and Forest Department, Fort St. George, Chennai, Tamil Nadu State 600 009. 2 The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest and Head of Forests Force Velachery Main Road, Guindy, Chennai, Tamil Nadu State 600 003. ... Respondents in both W.Ps. Common Prayer: Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India toissue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records which culminated in issuing in G.O.(2D).No.202, Environment, Climate Change and Forest (FR.2(ii)) Department dated 25.11.2025 on the file of the first respondent and qua...
K.Sankaran Vs B.Kalaimani
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH K.Sankaran S/o. G.Krishnamoorthy, Door No.5-81, Agraharam, Vishnupuram, Kudavasal Taluk, Thiruvarur - 609 501. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The District Revenue Officer, Thiruvarur, Thiruvarur - 614 205. ..Contemnor(s) PRAYER: This Contempt Petition is filed under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to issue summon and punish the respondent/1stRespondent for his act of contempt of court, wilful disobedience of the orderpassed by this Court dated 05.11.2025 made in the above W.P.No.42395 of 2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr. A. S. Bhuvaneswaran For Contemnor(s): Mr. D. Ravichander Special Government Pleader Page1 of 2N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.AsiORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing today, the proceedings of the respondent dated 24.02.2026 was placed before this Court.2. Recording the same, this Contempt Petition is closed. If the petitioneris aggrieved, it is left open t...
Tvl.Subhalaxmi Silks Readymades Vs The State Tax Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and WMP Nos.7573, 7576 & 7577 of 2026 Tvl.Subhalaxmi Silks Readymades Represented by its Proprietor, Mr Budharam Udaram Patel 70, Hanumantharayan Kovil Street, Gobi, Erode-638452. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The State Tax Officer No.144, Polavakalipalayam, Gobichettipalayam, Erode- 638 476.2. The Deputy Commissioner (GST Appeal), Erode No. 161, Commercial Taxes New Building, Brough Road, Erode- 638 001.3. The Assisstant Commissioner (ST)(FAC) No. 144, Polavakalipalayam, Gobichettipalayam, Erode- 638 452. ..Respondent(s) Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the impugned Orderu/s.73 dated 20/02/2025 having reference number ZD330225208345S for the tax period April 2020 to March 2021 passed by the 1st respondent and quash the same. Page1 of 6 For Petitioner(s): Mr.Anandh S For Respondent(s): Ms.Ami...
Pouchepavally vs Mouniammal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI Vs W/o.Ramamourthy, No.5, Impasse Des Martinets 60160, Montataire, France and Presently Come down and Staying at No.14, V Cross, Jayaram Chettiar Thottam, Vanarapet, Puducherry 605 001. Vs Page1 of 4 Vs To accept the revoke of my Power of Attorney and accept to file the second appeal. To accept the cause title and pass such further or other orders as this Court. For Appellant(s): Mr.D.Anandanarayan For Respondent(s): Mr.K.S.Karthik RajaORDER(i) In CMP No. 3890 of 2026: This Petition has been filed to accept the revoke of the petitioners Power of Attorney and accept to file the second appeal. Page2 of 4(ii) CMP No. 3884 of 2026: This Petition has been filed to accept the cause title.2. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and beingsatisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavits filed in support of both the petitions, both the Civil Miscellaneous Petitions ...
SHANMUGAVEL Vs The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
Crl.M.P.No.3527 of 2026 in Crl.RC.SR.No.3076 of 2026SUNDER MOHAN, J.This petition is filed to condone the delay of 2980 days in filing the Revision against thejudgment and sentence passed by the learned IIAdditional District and Sessions Judge, Salem District in Crl.A.No.33 of 2017 dated 16.08.2017, confirming the judgment in S.C.No.360 of 2016 dated 08.03.2017 on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Cum Assistant Sessions Judge, Salem.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Balaji, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent.3. Admittedly, the petitioner is in custody. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay stands condoned and the petition is ordered. 27.02.2026 Anu Note: Registry is directed to number this Criminal Revision, if it is otherwise in order. 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
SRI MARUTHI TRAVELS Vs The General Manager
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA and WMP No.7803 of 2026 Sri Maruthi Travels Rep. By its Proprietor, No.4/1 Bharathi Street, Chitturagadam, Ambattur, Chennai-600 053. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The General Manager Bank of India, Head Office,2. The Chief manager Zonal Office, No.17, Errabalu Street,3. The Zonal manager Chennai-600 001. ..Respondent(s)PRAYER: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondents 2 and 3 to sanction and release Rs.20,89,972/- toward enhanced monthly hire charges and Page1 of 4 extra mileage charges on account of the sharp increase of fuel charges in respect of petitioner vehicle bearing registration No.(1) TN-13-U-9624 (2) TN-13- V-0065 (3) TN-13-V-0495 and (4) TN-13-V-1321 involved in cash van transport service to the Respondents in between 01.02.2021 to 31.01.2025 and For Petitioner(s): Mr. C.K.M. AppajiORDERThe ...
Sarangarajan Vs Sheeja
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Sarangarajan ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Contemnor(s) Prayer: This contempt petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, seeking to punish the respondent for committing contempt of the order issued by this Court dated 04.11.2025 passed in W.P.No.40536 of 2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Arumuga Rajan For Contemnor(s): Mr.Abishek MurthyORDERThis Contempt Petition has been filed seeking to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of the order dated 04.11.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.40536 of 2025.2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that, the order under contempt has been complied with. Page1 of 33. Recording the above submission made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, this Contempt Petition stands closed. Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeut...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »