Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Sarangarajan Vs Sheeja

Sarangarajan vs Sheeja

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 27, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1418378

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CONT P/662/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sarangarajan

Respondent

Sheeja

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 27-02-2026coramthe hon'ble mr justice m.dhandapani sarangarajan ..petitioner(s) vs ..contemnor(s) prayer: this contempt petition is filed under section 11 of the contempt of courts act, 1971, seeking to punish the respondent for committing contempt of the order issued by this court dated 04.11.2025 passed in w.p.no.40536 of 2025. for petitioner(s): mr.p.arumuga rajan for contemnor(s): mr.abishek murthyorderthis contempt petition has been filed seeking to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of the order dated 04.11.2025 passed by this court in w.p.no.40536 of 2025.2. today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that, the order under contempt has been complied with. page1 of 33. recording the above submission made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, this contempt petition stands closed. index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no vm to: page2 of 3m.dhandapani, j.vm page3 of 3

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27-02-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Sarangarajan ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Contemnor(s) Prayer: This contempt petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, seeking to punish the respondent for committing contempt of the order issued by this Court dated 04.11.2025 passed in W.P.No.40536 of 2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Arumuga Rajan For Contemnor(s): Mr.Abishek Murthy

ORDER

This Contempt Petition has been filed seeking to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of the order dated 04.11.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.40536 of 2025.

2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that, the order under contempt has been complied with. Page1 of 3

3. Recording the above submission made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, this Contempt Petition stands closed. Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No VM To: Page2 of 3

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

VM Page3 of 3

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Sarangarajan vs Sheeja Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales