Chennai Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mrs. Stella Gnanamani Vs The Secretary
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and WMP Nos.8908 & 8910 of 20261. Mrs. Stella Gnanamani Nursing Tutor Grade-II, Government Thoothukudi Medical college Thoothukudi District2. C.Sarojini Nursing Tutor Grade-II, Government Thoothukudi Medical college Thoothukudi District ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Secretary Union of india Health and Family Welfare Room No.156-A Nirman Bhawan New Delhi-110 0112. The Secretary Indian Nursing council 8th floor, NBCC Centre Plot No.2, Community Centre Okhla Phase I New Delhi-110 0203. The Secretary Health and Family Welfare Department Fort St.George, Chennai-09 Page1 of 74. The Director Poonamallee High Road Kilpauk Chennai-600 0105. The Director Medical and Rural Health services DMS Campus Teynampet, Chennai-600 0066. The Joint Director of Medical Education and Research (Nursing Incharge) Kilpauk Chennai7. The Dean Thoothukudi District-628 0088. The Principal School of Nursing Governme...
BIRAN Vs The District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Biran Petitioner(s) Vs1. The District CollectorRespondent(s) PRAYER directing the respondents to conduct enquiry and to issue Chitta and patta for the property situated at Dharmapuri District, Palacode Taluk, Soodanur Village comprised in Survey No.140/8B, measuring to an extent of 30 cents in the name of the petitioner and the legal heirs of the deceased Nanjappan, namely (1) Muniraj and (2) Kaliappan based on the petitioner representation dated 09.02.2026 within a stipulated period in accordance with law. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Selvam For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Arumugam Govt AdvocateORDERThis writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to issue chitta and patta in the name of the petitioner and the legal heirs of the deceased Nanjappan namely (1)Muniraj and (2)Kaliappan for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, based on the petitioner'...
A.N.Easwaravel (Died) 1.A.E.Sivakumar Vs Padmavathi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR CRP No. 1075 of 2026 and CMP No.5682 of 2026 A.N.Easwaravel (Died)1. 1.A.E.Sivakumar2. E.Shanthi Easwaravel W/o A.N.Easwaravel,3. N.Gomathi D/o A.N.Easwaravel,4. A.E.Senthil ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. Padmavathi, W/o Velliangiri, 503, Murugampalayam, Tiruppur.2. Srinivasan Alias Sampath, S/o Muthusamy, 2nd Street Extension, Tiruppur. Page1 of 43. S.Rukmani W/o Srinivasan Alias Sampath,4. Sabari Keerthana D/o Srinivasan Alias Sampath,5. Jangan S/o Srinivasan Alias Sampath,6. T.Nagaraj, S/o Thangavel, No.2, Kumaran Street, Soorapatti, Erode. ..Respondent(s)Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to set aside the final order passed in IA.23/2026 in OS.325/2012 dated 09.12.2026 on the file of District Munsif at Palladam. For Petitioner(s): Mr. S.ParthasarathiORDERToday, when the matter is listed for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners would ...
Selvarj vs the Commissioner of Land Administration
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Selvarj Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Commissioner Of LandRespondent(s) PRAYER To Pass an order more particularly Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioners representation dated 10.02.2026 with regard to issuance of Patta, within the time frame fixed by this Honble Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Arumugavel For Respondent(s): Mr.D.Ravichander, SGPORDERThis writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to issue grama natham patta in favour of the petitioner for the property, morefully described in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition, based on the petitioner's representation dated 10.02.2026, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2.Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.3.No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioners representation, as stated supra,...
L.Devadoss vs the Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
W.M.P No.9008 of 2026 in W.P No.8320 of 2026M.DHANDAPANI, J.This petition filed to dispense with the production of the original impugned orders, is ordered. 27.02.2026 uma (2/3) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
J.Nantha Gopal vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2026CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE J.Nantha Gopal ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, District Collectorate, Cuddalore. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Cuddalore District, 3.The Tahsildar, 4.The Land Surveyor, Kumarapettai Village, 5.The Inspector of Police, Thiruppapuliyur Police Station, 6.Saravanan 7.Revathi ... Respondents Page No.1 of 6Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, direct the 3rd respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioners online application dated 10.02.2026 seeking sub-division/patta transfer of the property in S.No.44/2A1A1measuring 2.40 Acres situated at Kumarapettai Village, Cuddalore District, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court, and consequently direct the 3rd and 4th respondents to conduct survey of the petitioners land with the aid of the 5th respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Balara...
Malar vs the Tahsildar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Malar Petitioner(s) Vs1. The TahsildarMettur Taluk Office, Salem District. 2.The Taluk Head Surveyor Mettur Taluk, Salem District 3.The Inspector Of Police Karumalaikoodal Police Station, Mettur Taluk, Salem District 4.Sureshkumar 5.Kalyani 6.Janaki Respondent(s) PRAYER To Issue a Writ of Mandamus or order or direction in the nature of a writ directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to consider the petitioners online application dated 18.01.2026 and direct the respondents 1 and 2 fix the boundary stones as per the survey resport dated 20.02.2026 in the petitioners land in S.No.742/3C to the extent of 1.45 Acre Situated at F.N.Patti Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District and fix boundary stone with help of the 3rd respondent. For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.Elangovan For Respondent(s): Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Govt Advocate For R1 and R2 Mr.R.Venkatesa Perumal Govt Advocate(Crl.Side) For R3 R4 to R6-P...
S.MOHAMMED YASIN Vs the Revenue Divisional officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2026CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE1.S.Mohammed Yasin 2.M.Bowjiya Begam 3.A.Ribai Ahammed 4.A.Mohemmed Dhaha ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Coimbatore North, Coimbatore District. 2.The Tahsildar, Mettupalayam Taluk, Coimbatore District. 3.The Taluk Surveyor, Mettupalayam Taluk, Coimbatore District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to conduct an enquiry on the basis of the 1st respondent communication in O.Mu.No.4807/2024/A2 dated Nil.12.2024 (signed on 02.12.2024) and submit his report before the 1st respondent and consequently directing the 1st respondent to pass final orders for issuance of Ayan Patta in favour of the petitioners to the properties measuring to an extent of 1 Acre 91 cents situated in S.No.1001/1, No.10, Chikkathasampalayam Village, Page No.1 of...
KOVARASAN @ VICKY Vs State by The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Kovarasan @ Vicky ... Petitioner Vs. The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, Anaicut Police Station, Vellore District. Crime No.06 of 2026 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.06 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.Thirumoorthy D For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThe petitioner herein apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 132 and 351(2) of BNSS Act, 2023 in Crime No.06 of 2026, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. The allegation against the petitioner is that during the Jallikattu event, petitioner along with other accused had threatened the Officers who ha...
T.S.Prakash vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 8117 of 2026 AND WMP NO. 8788 OF 2026 T.S.Prakash Petitioner(s) Vs1. The District Collector2.The District Revenue Officer 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer 4.The Tahsildar Perundurai Taluk, Erode District 5.The Executive Officer Karumandisellipalayam Town Panchayat, Perundurai, Erode District Respondent(s) PRAYER To Issue a Writ of Certiorari Calling for the records relating to the impugnedorder in Na.Ka.5583/2025/A3 dated 29.09.2025 passed by the 3rd Respondentwithout issuing notice or conducting enquiry to the petitioner and to quash the same and pass such further or other orders. For Petitioner(s): Mr.I Abrar Mohamed Abdullah For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Jayaprakash Govt Advocate For R1 to R4 Mr.Vadivelu Deenadayalan, AGP For R5ORDERThis writ petition has been filed, challenging the impugned order dated 29.09.2025 passed by the third respondent, imposing penalty on the petitioner...
- ‹ Prev
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- Next ›
- Last »