Chennai Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/s. Eveready Spinning Mills Pvt. Ltd. Unit III Vs STATE OF TAMIL NADU
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA and WMP Nos.8466 to 8468 of 2026 M/s. Eveready Spinning Mills Pvt. Ltd. Unit III HTSC No 059094500282 , Nagampatty village, Vedasandur, Anjukulpatty, Dindigul Repd., Joint Managing Director, S.Chandrakumar ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. State Of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the Secretary to Government, Energy Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George,2. The Chief Electrical Inspector To The3. Tamil Nadu Generation And Distribution Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director,4. The Superintending Engineer, ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records Page1 of 4of the 1st Respondent comprised in G.O. (Ms.) No. 55 Energy (D2) Department subordinates, agents, men or any other persons claiming and / or acting under Energy Exchange / Power Exchange. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.S.Pandiyaraj For ...
C.Kalaiselvi vs the Commissioner
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.02.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI C.Kalaiselvi PetitionerVs Chennai-600 006 Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to issue an Appointment Order to the Petitioner as Assistant Statistical Investigator based on the Provisional Selection intimation Memorandum dated 05.11.2025 issued by the TNPSC and the Petitioners representation dated 27.01.2026 within a time frame fixed by this Court. For petitioner : Mr.S. Sathia Chandran For respondent : Mr.P. Ganesan Addl. Government PleaderORDERThe petitioner was selected for appointment to the post of Assistant Statistical Investigator based on the Provisional Selection Intimation Memorandum dated 05.11.2025 issued by the Tamil Nadu Public ServiceCommission. According to the petitioner, though she was duly selected, the appointment order has not been issued to her. There...
Ragul Sukla Vs Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.02.2026CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR Ragul Sukla ... Petitioner -vs- The State Rep.By, The Inspector of Police, Chennai-Dist, (Crime No.83 of 2025) ... Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr.No.83 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Shanmugam For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) *********ORDERThe petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 20.05.2025 for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 8(C) r/w 20(b) (ii)(C), 29(1) of NDPS Act in CC No.1252 of 2025, in Crime No.83 of 2025 on the file of respondent police seeks bail.2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learnedGovernment Advocate (Crl.Side) reported that earlier this Court dismissed the petitioner's anticipatory bail in Crl.O.P.No.27986 of 2025 on 31.10.2025, however, without any ...
P.Kalpana vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Its
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI P.Kalpana ..Petitioner Vs1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Secretary To Government Health & Family Welfare Department Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.2. Medical Services Recruitment Board Rep. by its Member Secretary 7th Floor, DMS Complex, Teynampet, Chennai-600 006. ..Respondent(s)Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.02.2026 and to consequently direct the respondents to prioritically consider and appoint the petitioner to the post of Auxiliary Nurse Midwife/Village Health Nurse, as per the rules prevailing on the date of appointment of the petitioner as Anganwadi Worker by transfer from Anganwadi Worker i.e prior to the amendment in G.O.Ms.No.254 dated 25.07.2023. For Petitioner(s): M/s.A.L.Ganthimathi, Senior Counsel Page1 of 5For Mr.L.P...
Dr.Manojkumar vs Union of India
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY in W.P.No.8309 of 20261. Dr.Manojkumar, aged 36 years, S/o. K.M.Velmurugan, No. 9 Breeze Apartments, Kilpauk, Chennai 10.2. Dr. A.Aishwarya Valli, aged 34 years, D/o. Adinarayanan, Flat A1, Elahi Manazil, 47/21 Sait colony Second street, Egmore, Chennai 083. Dr. A.K.Iyyappa, aged 40 years S/o. Arumugam, Flat No. 221, Gowri Ranka Enclave Apartments, Karunkalpalayam, Erode 637 015 Petitioner(s) Vs1. Union Of IndiaRep. by Directorate General of Health S ervices, Ministry of health and family welfare, Government of India, Nirman bhawan, New delhi 110 011 3.National Medical Commission rep. by its secretary, pocket 14, section 8, Dwarka Phase I, New Delhi 110 077 Respondent(s) This petitioner has been filed under Rule 15 of Madras High Court Rules, 2021, to permit the petitioners to join together to file a single writ petition. For Petitioners Mr.Harish Bindumadhavan For Responden...
S.Rangaswami vs U.Paruvaraj
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETES.Rangaswami S/o R.Sriraman, 1, Rangi St, Gugai, Salem. ..Appellant(s) Vs U.Paruvaraj S/o Veeramalai, Technical Trade Asst, O/o Divisional Engineer Maintenance Keeraboyan St, Four Rds, Salem Now At Swarnapuri Salem ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This Second appeal is filed against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.14 of 2011 dated 22.11.2011 by the Additional District Judge, Fast Track No.II, Salem, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.197 of 2009 dated 30.10.2010 by the Subordinate Judge, Salem. For Appellant(s): Mr.P.Jagadeesan For Respondent :Not ready in noticePage1 of 10JUDGMENTHeard.2. This Second Appeal is filed against the judgment and decree dated22.11.2011 in A.S. No. 14 of 2011 before the Additional District Judge (FTC II), Salem, which confirmed the judgment and decree dated 30.10.2010 in O.S. No. 197 of 2009 before the Principal Subordinate Judge, Salem....
Mahesh Kumar Malhotra Vs Jeyandran Daniel Moses
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR CRP No. 1060 of 2026 and CMP No.5627 of 20261. Mahesh Kumar Malhotra S/o. T.Jaichand Malhotra Vasu Street, Kilpauk Chennai 10. Suresh Kumar Malhotra (Died)2. J.B. Malhotra S/o. T.Jaichand Malhotra3. Kanchan Malhotra, W/o. Suresh Kumar Malhotra Old No.5, New No. 13,4. Hitesh Malhotra, S/o. Suresh Kumar Malhotra5. Avinash Malhotra, S/o. Suresh Kumar MalhotraDefendants 4 to 6 LRs of defendant No.2 impleaded vide I.A.No. 5 of 2025. Defendants/.Petitioners Vs Jeyandran Daniel Moses, S/o. Richard Moses No. TT-30, Tower 7, Ashiana Subham 83, Govindapuram, Melrosapuram Road, SP Koil Chengalpattu 603 204 ..Respondent(s) Page1 of 3 Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to call for the records relating to OS No. 82 of 2025 pending on the file District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Sholinganallur. For Petitioner(s): Mr. S.RajasekarORDERThe learned coun...
M/s.Sakthi Poly Products Vs The Assistant Commissioner(ST)(FAC)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.8732 and 8733 of 2026 M/s.Sakthi Poly Products Rep by its Partner-P Subramaniam, Maravapalayam, Kangayam, Tiruppur, Tamil Nadu-638 701. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Assistant Commissioner(ST)(FAC) Office of the Assistant Commissioner, Kangeyam Assessment Circle, Tiruppur -III, Tamil Nadu. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings passed by the Respondent in order vide GSTIN 33ABHFS4258E1Z8/2023-24 dated 19.09.2025 along with consequentialsummary of order in FORM GST DRC 07 bearing no.ZD330925236128A dated19.09.2025 passed under section 74 of the act, for FY 2023-24 to quash the same. For Petitioner(s): M/s.A.Rithika For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Harsharaj Special Government Pleader Page1 of 6ORDERMr.C.Harsharaj, learned Special Governm...
A.Alagesan vs the Principal Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI A.Alagesan ..Petitioner Vs1. The Principal Secretary to Government Cooperation, Food and Consumer Protection Department Government of TamilNadu Secretariat, Fort St. George Chennai 600009.2. The Registrar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C. Nagar Park Town, Chennai 600003. ..RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to issue appropriate Government Orders extending the service of the petitioner and consequently directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to continue in service as Member, District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Pudukkottai beyond 28.03.2026 with continuity of service, salary and all other attendant and concomitant service and pay benefits, until the completion of the recruitment Page1 of 7process under the new rules, in strict c...
S.Varadaraja Perumal vs the Principal Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI S.Varadaraja Perumal ..Petitioner Vs1. The Principal Secretary to Government Cooperation, Food and Consumer Protection Department Government of TamilNadu Secretariat, Fort St. George Chennai 600009.2. The Registrar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C. Nagar Park Town, Chennai 600003. ..RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to issue appropriate Government Orders extending the service of the petitioner and consequently directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to continue in service as Member, District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Erode beyond 29.03.2026 with continuity of service, salary and all other attendant and concomitant service and pay benefits, until the completion of the recruitment Page1 of 7process under the new rules, in stri...
- ‹ Prev
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- Next ›
- Last »