Chennai Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sathishkumar vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE1. Sathishkumar Petitioner(s) Vs1. The District CollectorCollectorate Tiruvallur 602001. 2.The District Revenue Officer Tiruvallur District. Tiruvallur 602001. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer 4.The Tahsildar 5.The Special Tashildar Adi Dravidar Welfare (adw) Office Revenue Divisional Office Tiruttani 631209. 6.The Revenue Inspector 7.The Village Administrative Officer (vao) Krishnasamudram (A) Village Tiruttani 631206. Respondent(s)PRAYER Forbearing the respondents from granting patta in respect of Government Poromboke lands comprised in Survey Nos. 293, 314 and 320 situated at Suriyanagaram Village and Government Poromboke lands comprised in Survey Nos. 280, 285, 286,294, 295, 296, 297, 298, 299, 300, 301, 302, 303, 305 and 370 situated at Krishnasamuthiram A Village Thiruttani Taluk, Tiruvallur District, based on the petitioners representation dated 17.09.2025For Petitioner(s): Mr....
Alur Jayakumar Vs Commercial Tax officer/State Tax officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.8769, 8770, 8778, 8779, 8780 and 8781 of 2026 Alur Jayakumar No.2 And 4, Madhavan Street, Sundarambal Nagar, Tambaram, Chennai-600 047. Tamilnadu ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. Commercial Tax officer/State Tax officer,Tambaram Assessment circle, Room No.107A, 1st floor, No.46, Mylapore Taluk office Building, Pasumpon Muthuramalingam Salai, Green ways Road, RA Puram, Chennai-28.2. Deputy Commissioner (ST), Tambaram Zone, 4th floor, PAPJM Building, Greams Road, Chennai.3. The Branch Manager, IDBI Bank, Old No.16, New No.24, Devi Arihant, 2, Dr Nair Rd, T. Nagar, Chennai, Tamil Nadu.4. The Branch Manager HDFC Bank Ltd Chitlapakkam Branch HDFC Bank Ltd No 79a, Rajendra Prasad Road, Nehru Nagar, Chrompet, Chennai, Tamil Nadu. Page1 of 65. The Branch Manager, ICICI Bank Ltd, No.2 And 4, Madhavan Street, Gst Road, Sundarambalnagar, Tambaram Sanitorium 600 047. ..Respondent(s)Prayer: Wr...
Yesodhammal (Deceased) 1.K.Audikesavalu Vs M.Sasikala
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI AND Yesodhammal (Deceased)1. K.Audikesavalu now amended as K.Adhikesavan,2. K. Chandran Mari (Deceased)3. Renuka4. Vijaya ..Petitioner(s) Vs M.Sasikala ..Respondent(s) Page1 of 4PRAYER : Petition filed under Section 115 of the C.P.C., to set aside the orderdated 20.02.2026 passed in E.A.No.1 of 2026 in E.P.No.168 of 2025 in O.S.No. 4394 of 2010 on the file of the XXVIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Ramesh For Respondent(s): Mr.K.S.SUNDAROrderThis Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the order dated 20.02.2026 passed in E.A.No.1 of 2026 in E.P.No.168 of 2025 in O.S.No. 4394 of 2010 on the file of the XXVIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.2. Heard Mr.M.Ramesh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.K.S.Sundar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.3. According to the learned counsel for the revision p...
Sri Sakthi periyamariamman Temple Vs The Additional Secretary to Gover ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and W.M.P.No.8698, 8700, 8702 and 8772of 2026 Sri Sakthi Periyamariamman Temple Represented by its Secretary P. Arjunan, Thangapuripattina, Mettur Dam, Salem District. ...Petitioner Vs1. The Additional Secretary toGovernment of Tamil Nadu Department of Tourism, Culture and Religious Endowments, St George Fort, Chennai. 2.The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious Charitable and Endowment Department, Kottai Mariamman Thirukovil Office, Salem. 3.The Executive Officer, Hindu Religious charitable and Endowment Department, Arulmigu Meenakeshi Sokkanathar Thirukovil, Mettur Town and Taluk,, Salme District. 4.The Revenue Divisional officer Mettur ...RespondentsPRAYERWrit Petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records relating to the impugned order passed by the 4 th respondent dat...
P.M.Muthukumar vs the Principal Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI P.M.Muthukumar S/o.P.Masanam, No.80SSV Kovil 1st street, Melapattadai, Perambur, Chennai-011. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Principal Secretary To Government Department of cooperation, food and consumer Protection, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai-09.2. The Registrar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, TNPSC Road, V.O.C. Nagar (Behind TNPSC), Park Town, Chennai-03. ..Respondent(s)Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to extend the tenure of the Petitioner as Member of District consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Nagapattinam, with the existing service Conditions, beyond 24.03.2026 until the completion of recruitment process after the new rules to be notified by the Page1 of 7 Union of India, inview of the judgement of the Honble Supreme Court dated 21.05.2025 in Civ...
S.SINDHUJA Vs The Director (Agricultural Marketing and Agri Business)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI And W.M.P.Nos.7718, 7719 and 7822 of 2026 S.Sinduja ... Petitioner Vs. Chennai 600 032. ... RespondentPrayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records connected with the impugned order passed by the respondent in No.Ve.A.Ni.1/1160/2025-2 dated 17.02.2026 in so far as transferring the services of the petitioner from the Seeds Testing Laboratory, Kanchipuram to Office of the Assistant Director of Agricultural, Walajapath and quash the same.For Petitioner : Mr.Balan Haridass for M/s.E.Sasirekadevi For Respondent : Mr.T.M.Rajangam Government AdvocateORDERThe petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records connected with the order passed by the respondent in No.Ve.A.Ni.1/1160/2025-2 dated 17.02.2026 in so far as transferring the servic...
Arjun V. Balaji Vs S.Vijayalakshmi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL AND Arjun V. Balaji S/o. K.V.Venkataram, Residing at New No.113, Old No.117, Ramalingam Colony, Coimbatore 641043. ..Petitioner(s) Vs S.Vijayalakshmi D/o. M.Sudhakaran, Residing at D.No.48/18D, 1street,, Throwpathi Amman Kovil Street, Velachery, Chennai 600 042. ..Respondent(s) Prayer : Original Petition filed under Section 25 of the Guardian and Wards Act r/w. Order 21 Rule 2 & 3 of Madras High Court Original Side Rules 1956 and clause XVII of Letter Patent Act, may be pleased to grant permanent custody of the minor child namely, Advaith aged 3 years to the petitioner. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.L.Joseph for M/s.Chennai Law Associates For Respondent(s): Mr. R.Balachanderan Page1 of 3ORDERToday, when the matter is taken up for consideration, both side counsel present and represented that the matter is amicably settled between the parties before the Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliati...
PRAKASH Vs The State rep.by Deputy Commissioner of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 27.02.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN Prakash S/o.Venkateshwaralu ... Petitioner Vs. State Rep. By1. Deputy Commissioner of Police Mylapore Police Station Royapettah, Chennai Tamil Nadu.2. The Inspector of Police E-2, Royapettah Police Station, Royapettah, Chennai. Crime No.327 of 2025 ... RespondentsPRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to direct the 1 st and 2nd respondents to produce the petitioners brother Praveen, S/o.Venkateshwaralu, aged about 24 years before this Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Balaji For Respondents : Mr.A.Damodaran Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.M.KarthikeyanORDER(Order of the Court was made by P.VELMURUGAN, J.) This Writ of Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents-Police to produce the petitioners brother namely, Prav...
V. Mohanam Vs State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN and1. V. Mohanam S/o. Vinayagam Mudaliyar, No. 46B, Kuyavar Street, Panapakkam Village, Nemili Taluk, Ranipet district 631 052 Petitioner(s) Vs1. State of Tamil NaduRep. by its Secretary, Industries , Investment Promotion and commerce department, Secretariat, Chennai 09 Chennai The District revenue officer, O/o. District collector, Ranipet Panapakkam, Industrial Park Project, Arakkonam , Ranipet Respondent(s)PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider and provide an alternative alignment for the access road without disturbing the petitioners gas distribution agency, in light of the representation of the petitioner dated 06.10.2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Sajeev Kumar for M/s. A.B. RAJASEKARAN For Respondent(s): Mr.L.S.M.Hasan Fizal Additional Government Pleader for RR 1, 3 &a...
Dhanasekar Vs The State rep by its The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.4903 of 20261. Dhanasekar2. Veeran3. Indhira4. Saravanan ... PetitionersVs. The State rep by its The Inspector of Police, Thiruvennainallur Police Station, Villupuram District. ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in Cr.No.97 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioners : Mr.R.Raji For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.side)ORDERThe petitioners, who apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1) and 351(3) of BNS, 2023 r/w Section 4 of TNPHW Act in Cr.No.97 of 2026 , on the file of the respondent police seek anticipatory bail.2. The case of the prosecution is that due to civil dispute, thepetitioners have abused and assaulted the defacto complainant and also caused inj...
- ‹ Prev
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- Next ›
- Last »