Chennai Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R.Aruchamy vs the Managing Director
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI R.Aruchamy S/o.Rengasamy No.3/70 Bajanai Koil Street T.Nalligoundanpalyaam Thalakarai Pollachi 642005. ..Petitioner(s) Vs Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Coimbatore ) Ltd ..Respondent(s)Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to pay 18 percentage per annum interest for the belated payment of terminal benefits from the date of retirement i.e. 31.01.2024 to till the date of actual payment made i.e. 25.08.2025 to petitioner. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Karthik For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Gauthamaraj Page1 of 4ORDERThis Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent to pay 18% per annum interest for the belated payment of terminal benefits from the date of retirement i.e. 31.01.2024 to till the date of actual payment made i.e. 25.08.2025 to the petitioner.2. It is the case of t...
P.Narayanan vs the Princpial Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and WMP No. 7102 OF 2026 P.Narayanan Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Principal Secretary to GovernmentMunicipal Administration and Water supply (ME-4) Department, Secretariat, Chennai 09 2.The Director of Local Fund Audit No. 571 Officers Building, Veterinary Hospital Campus, Opposite MC Raja Hostel, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai 35 3.The commissioner Avadi City Municipal Corporation, Avadi, Chennai 54 4.The Director of Municipal Administration No. 75 Santhome High Road, MRC Nagar, R.A.Puram, Chennai 28. Respondent(s) PRAYER; This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the 1st respondent from taking any action against the petitioner on the basis of the audit objection dated nil para 33(7) in Objection Chit No. 113/2020- 2021 and the audit objection dated nil para No. 33(8) in objection chit No. 114/2020- 2021 issued by the Loca...
R.Venkatarakrishnan Vs Kanagavalli
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR R.Venkatarakrishnan S/o.Late Ramu ... petitioner vs. Kanagavalli Administrator E-2287, Vakkur Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society Limited Vakkur Village & Post Vikiravandi Taluk Villupuram District - 605 501. ... Respondents Contempt Petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the order dated 01.12.2021 passed by this Court in W.P.No.17977 of 2020. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Kaviveerappan For Respondents : Mr.E.P.Senniyangiri Government Advocate ***** Page Nos.1/2 HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J., mkORDERToday, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that the order dated 01.12.2021 passed by this Court in W.P.No.17977 of 2020, which is the subject matter of the present contempt petition has been complied with.2....
Appu Alias Gopalakrishnan(Died) vs Prabakaran
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved on: 10.02.2026 Pronounced on:27.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI Rev.Appl. No.13 of 2008 in CRP. (NPD). No.1647 of 20061. Appu @ Gopalakrishnan (died)2. Umadevi3.Maheswari 4.Vijayalakshmi 5.Kokila 6.Rajalakshmi 7.Sriram Sundar (Petitioners 2 to 7 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased sole Petitioner vide order dated 08.12.2025) Petitioners Vs 1.Prabakaran Ambujammal (deceased) Pechimuthu Konar (deceased) Sivaraj (deceased) 2.Packirisamy 3.Velmurugan Respondent(s) PRAYER: This Review Petition is filed under Section 114 & 154 of CPC, to review the order dated 20.06.2007 wherein above, C.R.P. NPD. No.1647 of 2006. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Nandagopal For Respondents : Mr.N.Manoharan for R1 Died- R2 No Appearance for R3ORDERThis Application has been filed to review the order passed in CRP. No.1647 of 2006 on 20.06.2007.2. I have heard Mr.J.Nandagopal learned counsel for the review Applicant and Mr.N.Manoharan, learned...
THE DGM (T) AND PROJECT DIRECTOR Vs The District Collector and Sole Ar ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
CMP.No.5213 of 2026 in Arb Appeal.SR.No.6256 of 2026C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.andK.KUMARESH BABU, J.(Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan, J.) This petition filed to dispense with the production of original of the common order made in Arbitration OP No.162 of 2022 dated 24.11.2023 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Tiruppur, is ordered. (C.V.K.J., ) (K.B.J., ) 27.02.2026 kak https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
N.Abid Hussain Sayeed and 2 others Vs S.Sirajudeen and 6 others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL1. N.Abid Hussain Sayeed and 2 Street, Royapettah, Ch-14 and 2 2.N.Sajid Hussain Sayeed3. Naveen Hussain Sayeed Applicant(s) Vs1. S.Sirajudeen and 6 others S/o.Syed Mohamed Buhari, No.36/I-1, Methamar Palayam East New Street, Melapalayam, 2.Mohamed Masthan Lebbai S/o.Syed Mohamed Buhari, No,154, Periya Gothupa Palli Vasal, North West Street, Melapalayam, Playamkottai, Tirunelveli-627005 3.M.S.Khaja Nawaz S/o.Mr. Syed Mohamed Buhari, No,154/1, Periya Gothupa Palli Vasal, Vadakku Mela Street, Melapalayam, Playamkottai, 4.Asma W/o.Mr.Syed Ahamed Ali, No.50/37, Motha Meera Pillai street, Melapalayam, Palayamkottai, 5.M.Y.Samsudeen S/o.Mr.Mohamed Yousuf No.51-A, Kajanayagam Street, Melapalayam, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli-627005 6.Mohamed Riyaz 7.Suhail Ahamed Respondent(s) For Applicant(s): M/S.W.M. Abdul Majeed W.M.Abdul Azeez S.Silambarasan For Respondent: Mr.A.Simiyon RajaORDERThis applica...
Kuppunasi vs Nasiammal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
CMP No.5646 of 2026 in AS.SR.No.88062 of 2024N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.ANDR.SAKTHIVEL, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 550 days in payment of deficit court fee of Rs.750/- in filing the appeal. 2.Since, it is a matter between the Court and the appellants, notice to the respondent is dispensed with.3. Taking note of the reasons stated in theaffidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay, in payment of deficit Court fees, is condoned. Accordingly, this petition is allowed. 4.The Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order and post the admission in usual course. (N.S.K., J.) (R.S.V., J.) 27.02.2026 dhk https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Pewturman Decor Pvt.Ltd. Vs Tamil Nadu Small Industrial
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN1. Pewturman Decor Pvt.Ltd.Rep. by its authoised Signatory Mr.A.A.K.Apath Sakaayem Having its Registered Office at No.1 A Wing, 3rd Floor, Parsn Manere 602 Anna Salai Chennai 600006. Petitioner(s) Vs.1. Tamil Nadu Small Industrial Respondent(s) PRAYERWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records in the communication dated 22.12.2025, and quash the same as illegal, and consequently direct the respondents to execute the sale deed in respect of plot No.14 and 15 (DTCP Approved Nos.17 and 18), situated at Industrial Estate, Vemaniathur, in favour of the petitioner company and thereby render justice.For Petitioner(s): Ms.Gopila Nambiar for Mr.Govind Chandrasekhar For Respondent(s): Mr.ArunKumar for Mr.B.Anand Kumar Standing CounselORDERMr.Arunkumar representing Mr.B.Anand Kumar, Standing ...
G.Palanisamy vs R.Sengodan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN G.Palanisamy S/o.Mr.Govindasamy, No.12-3-9A, Veerakaran Kovil Street, Kolathur, Mettur Taluk, Salem District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs R.Sengodan S/o. Ramasamy, No.32/2, 7th Street, Kumaresapuram, Rajiv Nagar, Tiruchengode Taluk, ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Sections 438 & 442 of BNSS, to call for the records of the Judgment dated 25.10.2025 made in Crl.A.No.52 of 2025 passed by the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruchengode, Namakkal District in confirming the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 03.03.2025 in STC.No.40 of 2022 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate (Fast Track Court), Tiruchengode, Namakkal District.For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.R.Jothimanian For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Sasikumar Page1 of 4ORDERThe petitioner has preferred the above revision challenging the judgmentpassed by the learned II Additional District and Sessi...
B. Shivadharmaraj Vs Shriram City Union Finance Limited
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
C.M.P.No.5501 of 2026 in CRP.SR.No.8197 of 2026P.B.BALAJI, J.Dispensed with for the present.2. Registry is directed to number the Civil Revision Petition, if it is otherwise in order. 27.02.2026 dna https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »