Chennai Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Official Assignee vs S. Arjunlal Sunderdas
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED:17.04.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU in I.P.No.25 of 2014 The Official Assignee High Court Madras ..Applicant(s) Vs1. S. Arjunlal Sunderdas 23, Anderson Road Nungambakkam Chennai-62. B V Reddy Agencies BV Reddy Colony Chittoor A P 517001 ..Respondent(s)To direct the 2nd respondent to pay a sum of Rs.1,37,50,000/- with interest at 18% P.A. from 21.04.2014 till the date of realization with cost of the recovery proceedings. For Applicant(s) : M/s.K.V.Ananthakrushnan Assisted by M/s.A.Janani For Respondent(s) : M/s.Anna Mathew For M/s.Menon Page1 of 5ORDERThis matter is listed under the caption For Being Mentioned at the instance of the learned counsel for the respondents.2. Heard both sides.3. Considering the submissions made, paragraph Nos.3 to 8 shall be replaced with the following paragraphs:3. Ms.Anita Reddy had been adjudicated as a debtor and the dividend had also be...
The Official Assignee vs S. Arjunlal Sunderdas
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 17.04.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU in I.P.No.25 of 2014 The Official Assignee High Court Madras ..Applicant(s) Vs1. S. Arjunlal Sunderdas 23, Anderson Road Nungambakkam Chennai-62. B V Reddy & Sons BV Reddy Colony Chittoor A P 517001 ..Respondent(s)To direct the 2nd respondent to pay a sum of Rs.1,21,25,000/- with interest at 18% P.A. from 21.04.2014 till date of realization with cost of the recovery proceedings. For Applicant(s): M/s.K.V.Ananthakrushnan Assisted by M/s.A.Janani For Respondent(s): M/s.Anna Mathew For M/s.Menon Page1 of 5ORDER(Order of the Court was made by K.Kumaresh Babu J.) This matter is listed under the caption For Being Mentioned at the instance of the learned counsel for the respondents.2. Heard both sides.3. Considering the submissions made, paragraph Nos.3 to 10 shall be replaced with the following paragraphs:3. The respondents had been a...
Sivaji Vs Vaiyapuri
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR Sivaji, S/o. Ponnusamy, Melakadu, Kuruvapulam, Vedaranyam Taluk, Nagapattinam District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs Vaiyapuri, S/o. Rathinathevar, Melakadu, Kuruvapulam, Vedaranyam Taluk, Nagapattinam Distric. Ramalinga Thevar (Died). ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to set aside the order dated 07.10.205 made in IA No. 4 of 2024 in OS No. 89 of 2020 on the file of the Learned District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Vedaranyam.For Petitioner(s): Mr. G.Mageshkumar For Respondent(s): Mr.S.SenthilORDERThis Civil Revision Petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the Trial Court, dismissing the application filed by the petitioner to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased 2nd defendant. Page1 of 52. The petitioner herein/ plaintiff filed a suit in O.S.No.89 of 2020 forbare injunction against the first ...
R.Seethalakshmi and 2 others Vs Dr.Karthikeyan, IAS., and another
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH1. R.Seethalakshmi D/o. P.Rathinasamy, Computer Operator,2. B.Radhika, D/o.T.Balan Nair, Computer Operator,3. V.Masilamani, D/o. Vellimuthu, Computer Operator, ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. Dr.Karthikeyan, I.A.S., Page1 of 4 ..Contemnor(s)PRAYER: This Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the Respondent for his willful and intentional disobedience to the order of this Court passed in W.P.No. 26642 of 2024 dated 13.09.2024 For Petitioner(s): Mr. G.Bala For Contemnor(s): Mr. C. Selvaraj Additional Government Pleader for R1 Mr.D.R.Arun Kumar Standing Counsel for R2ORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation, placed a copy of the proceedings of the first respondent dated 13.02.2026. A copy of the same has also been served on the learned c...
C.SAKTHI Vs State of Tamil Nadu Represented by its
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
inIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN in Crl.R.C. No. 379 of 2026 C. Sakthi ..Petitioner Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, rep by the Inspector of Police, Uthukuli Police Station, Tiruppur. ..RespondentPRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 430(1) of BNSS praying to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner by judgment dated 31.10.2023 passed in C.C. No. 107 of 2019 by the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Uthukuli partly modified by judgment dated 19.09.2025 passed in Crl.A. No. 293 of 2023 by the learned Sessions Judge, Special Court for Trial under SC/ST (POA) Act, Tiruppur and enlarge the petitioner on bail, pending disposal of the revision petition. For Petitioner :: Mr.G. Saravananin For Respondent :: Mr.R. Vinothraja, Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThe revision has been filed challenging the judgment dated 19.09.2025 passed in Crl.A. No. 293 of 2023 by the learned Sessions ...
P.Bhaskar vs the Commissioner
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.02.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN P.Bhaskar S/o Parthasarathy No.18, Bramin Street Nanthivaram, Guduvancheri Vandallur Taluk Chengalpattu District. Petitioner(s) Vs Nungambakkam Chennai 600 034. Chengalpet. Respondent(s)Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Mandamus d irecting the Respondents herein to immediately take all steps necessary to Rejuvenate, Restore, Protect and preserve the Holy Temple tank called Manikarnika Tank / Theertha, tank of Arulmighu Ranganatha Temple, Thiruneermalai, Chengalpet within a reasonable timeframe as fixed by this honourable Court based upon the Newspaper Report published in the Hindu Newspaper on 28.11.2025, 04.12.2025.For Petitioner(s): M/s.B.Jagannath For Respondent(s): Mr. N.R.R.Arun Natarajan Spl. Govt. Pleader (HR&CE) for R1 Ms. Athiniveda For M/s.A.S.Kailas...
DR.SHWETA LIZBETH OOMEN Vs The University Grants Commission
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.02.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI and W.M.P. Nos. 1110 & 6054 of 2026 Dr.Shweta Lizbeth Oommen Petitioner Vs1. The University Grants CommissionRepresented by its Chairperson Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg New Delhi 110002 2.The Registrar Puducherry University Puducherry 3.The Director-Administration Madras Medical Mission No.4A, J J Nagar Mogappair Chennai 600 037. 4.Pondicherry Institute Of Medical Sciences Represented by its Chairman No.20 Kalapet Pondicherry 605014. 5.The Director-Principal 6.The Manager Office of The Manager (Administration) 7.The Inspector of Police Kalapet Police Station Puducherry. Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the 4th respondent dated 26.12.2025 pertaining to the Order of Termination and the consequentialOrder to vacate the Quarters No.C-1 dated 27.12.2025 passed by the 6 ...
The DGM (T) and Project Director Vs The District Collector And Sole Ar ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
CMP.No.5197 of 2026 in Arb Appeal.SR.No.214150 of 2025C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.andK.KUMARESH BABU, J.(Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan, J.) This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 457 days in representing the papers in the above appeal. 2.Taking note of the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay is condoned. Accordingly, this petition is allowed. 3.The Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order.(C.V.K.J., ) (K.B.J., ) 27.02.2026 kak https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Dayalan Rajes, vs Vijayan Rajes,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved on : 23.02.2026Pronounced on : 27.02.2026CORAM :The Hon'ble Mr.Justice N.SATHISH KUMAR and The Hon'ble Mr.Justice R.SAKTHIVEL A.S.No.772 of 2005 : 1.Dayalan Rajes 2.Mohan Rajes .. Appellants Vs. 1.Vijayan Rajes 2.Soundra Rajes 3.Gowri Pandiyanathan .. Respondents A.S.No.1003 of 2005 : Vijayan Rajes .. Appellant Vs. 1.Soundara Rajes 2.Mohan Rajes 3.Dayalan Rajes 4.Gowri Rajes @ Gowri Pandianathan .. Respondents A.S.No.856 of 2025 : Vijayan Rajes .. Appellant Vs. Soundara Rajes (died) 1.Dayalan Rajes 2.Mohan Rajes 3.Gowri Pandiyanadhan Bhanumathi (died) M.S.P.Rajes (died) 4.P.Jayaraj 5.Ulagaswari 6.Sankaraswari 7.Rajalakshmi 8.Vijayalakshmi 9.Madhana Ramamoorthy 10.Suguna Mahaendran 11.Rarthika Prabu 12.Periyasamy Ramesh Rajah 13.Preetha V.Kannan 14.Ramraj 15.Aswini Ramesh Rajah 16.Ashok Mohan Rajes .. RespondentsA.S.No.772 of 2005 has been filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 against the judgment and decree...
S.Karuna @ Karuna Serakalai Vs The State Rep by,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP NO.844 of 2026 S. Karuna @ Karuna Serakalai ... Petitioner/ Accused Vs Union, Rep. By, The Junior Intelligence Officer, NCB, Chennai. R.R.No.57 of 2023 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS Act, 2023, to enlarge him on bail pending in c.c.no.564 of 2024 on file of the learned Principal Special Judge, Special Court under EC and NDPS Act, Chennai. For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.G. Martinmanivannan For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.P. Kumar Special Public Prosecutor *******ORDERThe petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 18.11.2023, for the alleged offence punishable under Section 8(c) r/w. Section 21(c), 28 & 29 of NDPS Act 1985 in P.R.No.57 of 2023, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. The earlier bail application of the petitioner herein was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court, vide order dated 25.10.2025...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »