Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

P.Bhaskar vs the Commissioner

P.Bhaskar vs The Commissioner

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 27, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1414683

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/2104/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P.Bhaskar

Respondent

The Commissioner

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 27.02.2026coram :the honourable mr. manindra mohan shrivastava, chief justice and the honourable mr.justice g.arul murugan p.bhaskar s/o parthasarathy no.18, bramin street nanthivaram, guduvancheri vandallur taluk chengalpattu district. petitioner(s) vs nungambakkam chennai 600 034. chengalpet. respondent(s)prayer : petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india seeking a writ of mandamus d irecting the respondents herein to immediately take all steps necessary to rejuvenate, restore, protect and preserve the holy temple tank called manikarnika tank / theertha, tank of arulmighu ranganatha temple, thiruneermalai, chengalpet within a reasonable timeframe as fixed by this honourable court based upon the newspaper report published in the hindu newspaper on 28.11.2025, 04.12.2025.for petitioner(s): m/s.b.jagannath for respondent(s): mr. n.r.r.arun natarajan spl. govt. pleader (hr&ce) for r1 ms. athiniveda for m/s.a.s.kailasam associates for r2 mr.k.karthik jagannath government advocate for r3order(order of the court was made by the hon'ble chief justice) learned counsel for petitioner submits that petition itself may be disposed of with a direction to respondents to complete the cleaning of temple tank within a stipulated period.2. after hearing learned counsel for parties and going throughvarious documents and statements before this court, we direct the authorities to ensure that the temple tank is cleaned, as early as possible, preferably within three months.3. petition is disposed of. there shall be no order as to costs.(manindra mohan shrivastava, cj) (g.arul murugan,j) index : yes/no neutral citation : yes/no kpl to nungambakkam, chennai 600 034. chengalpet district. chengalpet district, chengalpet. the hon'ble chief justice andg.arul murugan,j.(kpl)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27.02.2026

CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN P.Bhaskar S/o Parthasarathy No.18, Bramin Street Nanthivaram, Guduvancheri Vandallur Taluk Chengalpattu District. Petitioner(s) Vs Nungambakkam Chennai 600 034. Chengalpet. Respondent(s)

Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Mandamus d irecting the Respondents herein to immediately take all steps necessary to Rejuvenate, Restore, Protect and preserve the Holy Temple tank called Manikarnika Tank / Theertha, tank of Arulmighu Ranganatha Temple, Thiruneermalai, Chengalpet within a reasonable timeframe as fixed by this honourable Court based upon the Newspaper Report published in the Hindu Newspaper on 28.11.2025, 04.12.2025.

For Petitioner(s): M/s.B.Jagannath For Respondent(s): Mr. N.R.R.Arun Natarajan Spl. Govt. Pleader (HR&CE) for R1 Ms. Athiniveda For M/s.A.S.Kailasam Associates for R2 Mr.K.Karthik Jagannath Government Advocate for R3

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petition itself may be disposed of with a direction to respondents to complete the cleaning of temple tank within a stipulated period.

2. After hearing learned counsel for parties and going through

various documents and statements before this Court, we direct the authorities to ensure that the temple tank is cleaned, as early as possible, preferably within three months.

3. Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No kpl To Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034. Chengalpet District. Chengalpet District, Chengalpet. THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND

G.ARUL MURUGAN,J.

(kpl)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial