Chennai Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R.Sundaravaraman vs Union of India
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
W.M.P No.2617 of 2026 in W.P No.2362 of 2026M.DHANDAPANI, J.This petition filed to dispense with the production of the original impugned orders, is ordered. 29.01.2026 uma (2/2) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Krishnamurthy Vs UNION OF INDIA
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and W.M.P.No.1460 of 20261. Krishnamurthy s/o.Late.Thangavelu, No.8, Mettu Street, Marasur, Pondicherry-605 502.2. Mangalatchoumy d/o.late.Thangavelu, No.8, Mettu Street, Karasur, Pondicherry-605 502. rep. by her power agent Krishnamurthy (1st petitioner herein) ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. Union Of India Rep. by the Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Government of Ponducherry, Puducherry-605 001.2. The District Collector (Revenue) I-Floor, New Revenue Complex, Vazhudavoor Road, Pettaiyanchathiram, Puducherry-605 009.3. The Deputy collector (revenue) south-cum-Land Acquisition officer, Special Economic Zone, Villianur, Puducherry-605 001. ..Respondent(s) Page1 of 5 PRAYER: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent / The District Collector(Revenue) to consider the petitioners r...
A.Rajendran Vs The Managing Director
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI A.Rajendran SPG Conductor (Retd) S/o.Annamalai Employee No.MTC-A15189 Depot Adambakkam, No.229, Tank Street, Velangadu, Thennathur, Tiruvannamalai District-604 501. ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent corporation to pay interest on the delayed disbursement of EPF, EGF, Leave surrender for the period from 01.07.2024 to December 2025 at the rate of 12 percent per annum. Page1 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.B.Balaji For Respondent(s): Mr. A. VinothrajORDERThis Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondent corporation to pay interest on the delayed disbursement of EPF, EGF, Leave surrender for the period from 01.07.2024 to December 2025 at the rate of 12 percent per annum.2. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner, who had joine...
CHANDRABABU KOTTA Vs The State rep by Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR in Chandrababu Kotta Petitioner/A1 Vs The State, Rep. By The Inspector of Police Crime No. 185 of 2025. RespondentPrayer: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 praying to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner viz., 6(b) The petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am till transfer of investigation to Andhra Pradesh. Thereafter, shall appear before the Investigating Agency at Andhra Pradesh by its order dated 12.09.2025 in Crl.O.P.No. 24967 of 2025.For Petitioner : Mr.K.R.Ramesh Kumar For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate, Criminal Side ----ORDERToday, when the matter came up for hearing, Mr.K.R.Ramesh Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that already this Court had relaxed the conditions imposed by this Court in respect of co-accused in Crl.M.P.No.20784 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No. 25085 of 202...
Mohamed Basheer Vs The Inspector General of Registration
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and W.M.P.No.1407 of 20261. Mohamed Basheer S/o Abdul Quddhose, No 15/21, Thirumalai Atchari Street, Arakkonam, Vellore District.2. Muneer Ahamed S/o Abdul Quddhose, No 15/21, Thirumalai Atchari Street, Arakkonam, Vellore District3. Noorunnisa W/o Mujipar Basha, No 57, Vedhachalam Street, Arakkonam, Vellore District ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Inspector General of Registration 100, Santhome High Road, Chennai 600 028 Page1 of 52. The Sub Registrar Joint IV Office of the sub Registrar, Kancheepuram..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, call for the records of the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in RFL / Sub Registrar Joint IV, Kanchipuram / 31/ 2025 dated 15.12.2025 and quash the same as illegal arbitrary and non-est in law and consequently, direct the 2nd r...
M.Pachaiyappan 41631 vs the Managing Director
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 29.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI M.Pachaiyappan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Managing Director, Valudhareddy Post, Villupuram 605 602. 2.The General Manager, Kancheepuram Regional Office, Ponnerikkarai, Chennai Bangaluru Highway, Kancheepuram 631552. 3.The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar House, Pallavan Salai, Chennai 600002. ....RespondentsPRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pay interest amounts to the petitioner for the belatedly paid Service Gratuity, Provident Fund, Leave Salary and Commutation of Pension at the rate of 6 percentage per annum for 18 months of delayed payment in the light of thejudgment passed by this Honble Court on 23.10.2024 WP.No.30766 of2024. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Ishak For R1 and R2 : Ms.S.Pavithra For R3 : Mr.C.S.K.Sat...
Shanmugam vs Ravi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.01.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA and Shanmugam ...Petitioner Vs. Ravi ...Respondent Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita/Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to set aside the orderpassed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chengalpattu in Criminal Revision Petition No.19 of 2024 dated 11.11.2025 in order passed by Court of Judicial Magistrate No.1, Madurantakam in Crl.MP.No.2468 of 2023 in CC.No38 of 2022, order dated 13.06.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.M.JaikumarORDERThis criminal original petition has been filed seeking to quash theorder dated 11.11.2025 passed by the learned Principal District and SessionsJudge, Chengalpattu in Criminal Revision Petition No.19 of 2024.2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:-2.1. The petitioner is an accused facing trial for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act before the learned Judicial M...
SAMUVEL Vs The State Rep.by its, The Sub Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 29.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR1. Samuvel2. Sugumar @ Naveen ... Petitioners Vs. The State Rep. By, The Sub Inspector of Police, Arakkonam Taluk Police Station, Ranipet District. Crime No.464 of 2025 ... RespondentPRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.464 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioners : Mr.M.Rajinikanth For Respondent : M/s.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Criminal Side)ORDERThe petitioners herein apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 296(b), 115(2), 329(4), 351(2) of BNS in Crime No.464 of 2025, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. The case of the prosecution is that on 04.12.2025 due to moneydispute, petitioner abused the defacto complainant in ...
Venkatesan Vs State rep.by, Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Venkatesan ..Petitioner(s) Vs State rep.by, Inspector of Police, Cr.No.518/2025. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: To extend the period of 1 weeks to comply the conditions imposed in Crl.Op.No.34841/2025 dated 19.12.2025. For Petitioner(s): M/s.T.Sreelekha For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to extend the time for complying the conditions as per the order of this Court in Crl.O.P.No.34841 of 2025 dated 19.12.2025. Page1 of 2K.RAJASEKAR, J.GBI2. Heard both sides.3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this petition isordered and time is extended by one week to the petitioner to comply the conditions as ordered by this Court, from the date on which, the order copy made ready. 29-01-2026 GBI 1/2 To 1.The Inspector of Police, 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Page2 of 2...
SARATHAMANI Vs The State Rep By The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR in 1.Sarathamani 2.Ramakrishnan Petitioners Vs The State, Rep. By The Inspector of Police Crime NO. 09 of 2023. Respondent Prayer: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 praying to relax the condition of the petitioner shall report before the respondent police DCB Police Station, Tiruppur, daily at Everyday at 10.30 am., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, every Saturday at 10.30 am until further orders imposed in Crl.O.P.No. 30680 of 2024, dated 10.12.2024. For Petitioners : Mr.P.Thinesh For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate, Criminal Side ----ORDERToday, when the matter came up for hearing, Ms.J.R.Archana, learned Government Advocate, (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that the petitioners have been complying with the conditions imposed on the petitioners by this Court in Crl.O.P.No. 30680 of 2024, dated ...
- ‹ Prev
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- Next ›
- Last »