Krishnamurthy Vs UNION OF INDIA

Krishnamurthy vs Union of India

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jan 29, 2026

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1414486

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1414486
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Decided On: Jan 29, 2026
Case Number: WP/1265/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Krishnamurthy

Respondent

Union of India

Excerpt

.....similarly placed persons were awarded higher compensation, the petitioners applied under section 28a of the above mentioned enactment seeking parity in compensation. on the ground that the said application has not been acted upon, the present writ petition has been filed. page2 of 52. mr.v.vasanthakumar, learned additional government pleader(puducherry), accepts notice for all the respondents. on the basis of written instructions, he submits that the application would be considered and disposed of by making disbursement of compensation in accordance with law.3. in view of the above submissions, this writ petition is disposed of bydirecting the third respondent to consider the petitioners’ application under section 28a of the land acquisition act, 1894 and take necessary measures in relation thereto within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. no costs. consequently, the connected writ miscellaneous petition is closed. 29-01-2026 (2/3) index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no rna page3 of 5 to1. union of india rep. by the secretary to government, revenue department, government of ponducherry, puducherry-605 001.2. the district collector (revenue) i-floor, new revenue complex, vazhudavoor road, pettaiyanchathiram, puducherry-605 009.3. the deputy collector (revenue) south-cum- land acquisition officer, special economic zone, villianur, puducherry-605 001. page4 of 5senthilkumar ramamoorthy, j.rna and w.m.p.no.1460 of 2026 29-01-2026 (2/3) page5 of 5

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 29-01-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and W.M.P.No.1460 of 2026
1. Krishnamurthy s/o.Late.Thangavelu, No.8, Mettu Street, Marasur, Pondicherry-605 502.
2. Mangalatchoumy d/o.late.Thangavelu, No.8, Mettu Street, Karasur, Pondicherry-605 502. rep. by her power agent Krishnamurthy (1st petitioner herein) ..Petitioner(s) Vs
1. Union Of India Rep. by the Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Government of Ponducherry, Puducherry-605 001.
2. The District Collector (Revenue) I-Floor, New Revenue Complex, Vazhudavoor Road, Pettaiyanchathiram, Puducherry-605 009.
3. The Deputy collector (revenue) south-cum-

Land Acquisition officer, Special Economic Zone, Villianur, Puducherry-605 001. ..Respondent(s) Page1 of 5 PRAYER: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent / The District Collector(Revenue) to consider the petitioners representation dated 25.01.2019, 16.06.2025 and 07.11.2025 to re-determine the compensation awarded to the petitioner for his lands in R.S. No.92/5 and 90/7 measuring for total extent of 0.24.25 ares acquired at Karasur Revenue Village in Award No.2/2008 to a sum of Rs.21,261/- per are, pursuant to the enhanced compensation award dated 01.12.2018 passed in LAOP No.110 of 2012 on the file of II Additional District Judge, Puducherry. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Usharamman For Respondent(s): Mr.V.Vasanthakumar, Additional Government Pleader (Puducherry)

ORDER

The petitioners’ lands were acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Upon applying for enhanced compensation, enhanced compensation was awarded. After coming to know that similarly placed persons were awarded higher compensation, the petitioners applied under Section 28A of the above mentioned enactment seeking parity in compensation. On the ground that the said application has not been acted upon, the present writ petition has been filed. Page2 of 5

2. Mr.V.Vasanthakumar, learned Additional Government Pleader

(Puducherry), accepts notice for all the respondents. On the basis of written instructions, he submits that the application would be considered and disposed of by making disbursement of compensation in accordance with law.

3. In view of the above submissions, this writ petition is disposed of by

directing the third respondent to consider the petitioners’ application under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and take necessary measures in relation thereto within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, the connected writ miscellaneous petition is closed. 29-01-2026 (2/3) Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA Page3 of 5 To

1. Union Of India Rep. by the Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Government of Ponducherry, Puducherry-605 001.

2. The district collector (Revenue) I-Floor, New Revenue Complex, Vazhudavoor Road, Pettaiyanchathiram, Puducherry-605 009.

3. The Deputy collector (revenue) south-cum- Land Acquisition officer, Special Economic Zone, Villianur, Puducherry-605 001. Page4 of 5

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.

RNA and W.M.P.No.1460 of 2026 29-01-2026 (2/3) Page5 of 5

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties Krishnamurthy vs Union of India Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy