Chennai Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
T.Murugan vs the Competent Authority
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 05.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA T.Murugan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Competent Authority The District Registrar Chennai South. 2.Lakshmipathy 3.Ahesunul Maalik ... RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records in A.T.M.No.5132/E1/2024 dated 18.12.2024 on the file of 1st respondent and to quash the same and further direct the 1 st respondent to enquire my complaint dated 12.12.2024 and to take appropriate action and pass orders. For Petitioner : Dr.G.Krishnamurthy For Respondents : Ms.Akila Rajendran Government Advocate for R1 Mr.E.Sivanandan for R2 & R3ORDERThe writ petition has been filed seeking to quash the impugned of the first respondent dated 18.12.2024 in A.T.M.No.5132/E1/2024 and to direct the first respondent to enquire into his complaint dated 12.12.2024.2. The case of the petitioner is that h...
Southern Railway vs the Registrar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
2026:MHC:57IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR AND1. Southern Railway Rep. By Its General Manager, Chennai-3.2. The Senior Divisional Engineer/ Co-ordination, Divisional Office, Southern Railway, Palghat-678 002. ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s)Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of writ of certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the entire records of the first respondent in O.P.No.97 of 2003 including the order dated 27.9.2004 and quash the same and direct constitution of the Arbitral Tribunal in terms of Clause 64(3) (a)(ii) of the General Conditions of Contract forming part of the Arbitration Agreement J/38 dated 28.1.1999 entered into between the petitioners and the 2nd respondent. For Petitioner(s): No appearanceFor Respondent(s): No appearanceORDER(Order of the Court was made by Dr.Anita Sumanth J.) This matter...
Thulasimani vs the Sub-Registrar,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
2026:MHC:59IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR Thulasimani W/o.Palanisamy, No.138, Anjal Exchange Street, Avinashi Town Panchatyat, Avinashi Taluk, Coimbatore District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs (R2 and R3 impleaded vide order of this Court dated 19.08.10 in M.P.No.1 of 2010 in W.P.No.27121 of 2009) ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ petition filed under article 226 of Constitution of India to issue a writ, order or direction more specifically a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records on the file of the respondent herein in pursuance to hisorder dated 11/12/2009 and quash the same and consequently direct therespondent herein to register the sale agreement executed by petitioner, dated 9.12.2009. For Petitioner(s): No appearance For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Anandakumar Government Advocate R1 No appearance R2 & R3ORDER(Order of the Court was made by Dr.Anita S...
Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd vs the Regional Provident Fund
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
2026:MHC:58IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd Rep By Its Chief Manager, George Town Branch, STS Complex, 1st Floor, 194, Anna Pillai Street, Chennai 600001. ..Petitioner(s) Vs2. Recovery Officer ..Respondent(s)Prayer: Writ petition filed under article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of writ of declaration, declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 2, in bringing the movable and immovable properties belonging to M/s. KICM (Madras) Ltd., (the 3rd respondent herein) which are hypothecated/mortgaged with the petitioner bank for sale overlooking the claim of the petitioner as illegal and consequently to set aside the auction that has taken place on 4.3.2009in pursuance of the proclamation for sale published in Dina Malar, Coimbatore edition, dt 12.2.2009. For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.Chandrasekaran For Respondent(s): Mr.C. Kulant...
Dhanasekaran vs Kavipriya
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 05.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR and C.M.P.No.3339 of 2024 1.Dhanasekaran 2.Sasikala 3.Nivedha 4.Vinoth ... Petitioners vs. 1.Kavipriya 2.Janardanan ... Respondents PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to call for the records pertaining to D.V.C.No.22 of 2023 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate/Additional Mahila Court, Villupuram and strike off the name of the petitioners on the ground of abuse of process of law by allowing the present Civil Revision Petition. For Petitioners : Mr.M.Guruprasad For R1 : Mr.P.Munusami For R2 : No AppearanceORDERThe Civil Revision Petition is filed seeking to strike off the complaint preferred by the 1st respondent under the provisions of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 in D.V.C.No.22 of 2023 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate/Additional Mahila Court, Villupuram.2. The learned counsel appearing...
S.Duraisamy vs the Chairman and Secretary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P No. 3101 of 2024 S.Duraisamy Petitioner Vs1. The Chairman & Secretary to the Government, Transport Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.2. The Management,Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Coimbatore) Ltd., Erode Region, Chennimalai Road, Erode-638 001. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the 2nd Respondent in proceedings in Na.Ka.No.1687/B10/Pa.Pi.2/Tha.Aa.Po.Ka/Ko/E.Ma/2023 dated 20.07.2023 and to quash the same and consequently direct the 2 nd respondent to regualarizethe petitioners leave commencing from 12.11.2019 to 03.08.2021 towards the available medical leave commencing from 12.11.2019 to 03.08.2021 towards the available medical leave or earned leave available found in his credit. For Petitioner: Mr.V.Gova...
Mary Josephine, Vs The Director of Elementary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 05.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR and W.M.P.No.13473 of 2016 Mary Josephine D/o.Rajarethinam ... Petitioner vs. Trichy District. RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records on the file of the second respondent relating to the impugned order bearing Government Letter Na.Ka.No.404/A4/2014 dated 19.03.2014, quash the same as arbitrary and illegal and consequently, direct the respondents to grant incentive and increment with effect from April 2010 for acquiring B.Ed qualifications with all the consequential benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Sathyabal For Respondents : Mrs.P.Raja Rajeswari Government Advocate *****Page Nos.1/3ORDERToday, the captioned writ petition is listed under the cause list caption 'FOR WITHDRAWAL' as the learned counsel for the petitioner circulated a letter dated 02.12.2025 seeking w...
R.Mohan, vs the State of Tamilnadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
2026:MHC:161IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN1. R.Mohan, S/o.C.Rathinam, No. 47, Old No. 26, 1st Street, Parameshwari Nagar, Adyar, Chennai - 600 020. Petitioner(s) Vs1. The State Of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its The Secretary To State, Municipal Administration And Water Supply Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009. 2.The Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation, Ripon Buildings, Chennai - 600 003. 3.The District Revenue Officer, Land And Estate Department, Greater Chennai Corporation, Ripon Buildings, Chennai - 600 003.4.The Zonal Officer, Zone-xiii, Greater Chennai Corporation, Adyar, Chennai - 600 020. 5.The Tahsildar, Velachery Taluk, Taramani 100 Feet Road, Chennai - 600 113. 6.M/s. Jhn Shasanem Trade Center Private Limited, Rep. By Its Director Jainullabdeen Haja Najumudeen, No. 5, Anaikatti Maidan, Beema Nagar, Trichy - 620 001. 7.J.H.Najumudeen, No. 5, Anaikat...
S.Krishnamoorthy, vs the Managing Director,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR and MP.No.1 of 2012 S.Krishnamoorthy ...Petitioner Vs.1.The Managing Director S.B.I.Life Insurance Co.Ltd., Natraj M.V.Road Western Express Highway Junction Andheri (East) Mumbai 400 069. 2.The Associate Vice-President (HR) S.B.I.Life Insurance Co. Ltd Natraj M.V.Road Western Express Highway Junction Andheri (East) Mumbai 400 069. 3.The Regional Manager (HR) S.B.I.Life Insurance Co.Ltd., State Bank Learning Centre 3 Floor 20, Pycrafts Garden Road Nungambakkam Chennai 600 006. ...RespondentsPrayer: This Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records from thesecond respondent relating to the order dated 06.06.2012 read with the orderdated 20.04.2012 and the order of the third respondent dated 18.02.2012 terminating the services of the petitioner and quash the said order and direct the respond...
Ganesan vs G.Bhuvaneshwari
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 05.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI and C.M.P.No.19268 of 2023 1.Ganesan ... Appellant Vs. 1.G.Bhuvaneswari 2.Thilagam 3.Senthil kumar 4.Ponnaiyan 5.P.Vimala 6.Vijayasarathy 7.P.Balaji 8.D.Thajujdheen 9.The Manager, M/s.Canara Bank, Vayalur 10.Wahitha Bibi 11.Ibrahim 12.Yusuf RespondentsPrayer: This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the judgment and decree dated 25.09.2020 passed in A.S. No.16 of 2015 on the file of the learned Principal District Court, Kancheepuram at Chengalpet confirming the judgment and decree dated 31.07.2014 passed in O.S. No.126 of 2010, on the file of the Sub-Court, Maduranthagam. For Appellants : Mr. N.Nithianandam For Respondents : Mr.V.B.Thirumalai Kumar for R1 No appearance for R2 to R9 & R11 R10 & 12 not ready in noticeJUDGMENTThis Second Appeal is filed against the judgment and decree dated 25.09.2020 passed in A.S...
- ‹ Prev
- 345
- 346
- 347
- 348
- 349
- 351
- 352
- 353
- 354
- 355
- Next ›
- Last »