Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mary Josephine, Vs The Director of Elementary

Mary Josephine, vs The Director of Elementary

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jan 05, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1420704

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/15432/2016

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mary Josephine,

Respondent

The Director of Elementary

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 05.01.2026coramthe honourable mr.justice hemant chandangoudar and w.m.p.no.13473 of 2016 mary josephine d/o.rajarethinam ... petitioner vs. trichy district. … respondentswrit petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india seeking a writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records on the file of the second respondent relating to the impugned order bearing government letter na.ka.no.404/a4/2014 dated 19.03.2014, quash the same as arbitrary and illegal and consequently, direct the respondents to grant incentive and increment with effect from april 2010 for acquiring b.ed qualifications with all the consequential benefits. for petitioner : mr.k.sathyabal for respondents : mrs.p.raja rajeswari government advocate *****page nos.1/3ordertoday, the captioned writ petition is listed under the cause list caption 'for withdrawal' as the learned counsel for the petitioner circulated a letter dated 02.12.2025 seeking withdrawal of the captioned writ petition. in view of the above, the captioned writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. there shall be no order as to costs. index : yes / no neutral citation : yes / no speaking / non-speaking mk to trichy district. page nos.2/3 hemant chandangoudar, j., mk page nos.3/3

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 05.01.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR and W.M.P.No.13473 of 2016 Mary Josephine D/o.Rajarethinam ... Petitioner vs. Trichy District. … Respondents

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records on the file of the second respondent relating to the impugned order bearing Government Letter Na.Ka.No.404/A4/2014 dated 19.03.2014, quash the same as arbitrary and illegal and consequently, direct the respondents to grant incentive and increment with effect from April 2010 for acquiring B.Ed qualifications with all the consequential benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Sathyabal For Respondents : Mrs.P.Raja Rajeswari Government Advocate *****

Page Nos.1/3

ORDER

Today, the captioned writ petition is listed under the cause list caption 'FOR WITHDRAWAL' as the learned counsel for the petitioner circulated a letter dated 02.12.2025 seeking withdrawal of the captioned writ petition. In view of the above, the captioned Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No Speaking / Non-speaking mk To Trichy District. Page Nos.2/3 HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J., mk Page Nos.3/3

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial