Chennai Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/s.VELAYUTHAM AND CO Vs the State Transport Authority
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 25-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WP No. 3069 of 2026 M/s.VELAYUTHAM AND CO Rep. by its Partner V.Gopalakrishnan 7 Calve Bungalow, Puducherry .. Petitioner Vs The State Transport Authority Puducherry .. Respondent For Petitioner : Mr.K.Hariharan For Respondent : Mrs.V.Usha for Mr.P.Tamilvanan, Additional Government Pleader (Pondy)ORDERIn terms of the order passed by this court on 30.01.2026, the respondent was directed to pass appropriate orders under Section 82 of the Motor Vehicles Act and report compliance to this Court.2. The respondent was not in a position to pass an order on account of objection that had been made by one, Gnanasekaran. Yesterday, i.e. on 24.02.2026, the writ petition in W.P.No.6385 of2026, filed by the said Gnanasekaran was dismissed by this Court, removing the impediment that the respondent was suffering to pass orders, as per the order dated 30.01.2026.3. Mrs.V.Usha had stated on 24.0...
RAYAPPAN Vs State rep.by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
Crl.M.P.No.1190 of 2026 in Crl.A.SR.No.103101 of 2025SUNDER MOHAN, J.This petition is filed to condone the delay of 288 days in filing the above Criminal Appeal2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Raja Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay stands condoned and the petition is ordered. 30.01.2026 Tsg Note: Registry is directed to number this Criminal Appeal, if it is otherwise in order. 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M.AMRUTHA Vs The District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2026CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE1.M.Amrutha 2.K.Muniraj ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The District Collector, Office of District Collector, 2.The District Revenue Officer, Office of the RDO, 3.The Sub Collector, Office of the Sub Collector, Hosur 635 109. 4.The Tahsildar, Office of Tahsildar, Denkanikottai 635 107. 5.Nagaraj 6.Eswaran 7.Menaka ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to Page No.1 of 7remove the names of the legal heirs of Late Mr.Maregowdu from Patta No.8631 and Patta No.8772 and to issue separate joint patta in favour of the 1st petitioner and her husband Mr.Ravi in respect of Survey Nos.368, and separate patta in favour of the 2 nd petitioner in respect of Survey No.412/1 and 412/2 at Ballapalli Village, Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District by considering both the represen...
R.Jayapal vs the Managing Director
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI R.Jayapal ... Petitioner Vs. Chennai 600 002. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to pay interest at the rate of 8% per annum on the delayed payment of the fixed by this Honble Court. For Petitioner : Ms.D.Nirmala For Respondents : Mrs.S.Pavithra for R1 Mr.C.S.K.Sathish for R2ORDERBy consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 2.The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to pay interest at the rate of 8% per annum on the delayed payment of the fixed by this Court.3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner who had joined the services of the respondent Corporation, had retired from service on 30.06.2017, however, the terminal b...
N.Devanathan Vs The Managing Director
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANIN.Devanathan ..Petitioner(s) Vs (Villupuram)Ltd, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, (Villupuram )Ltd, Employees Pension Fund Trust, ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay interest to the petitioner at the rate of 9% per annum for the belated payment of his Provident Fund, Leave Liability, Gratuity and Pension Commutation Amount. Page1 of 4For Petitioner(s) : Mr.P.Manojkumar For Respondent(s) : Mrs.S.PavithraORDERAggrieved by the belated payment of terminal benefits such as Provident Fund, Leave Liability, Gratuity and Pension Commutation Amount, the petitioner has come up with this Writ petition seeking interest at the rate of 9% per annum, for the said delay caused on the part of the respondents.2. In view of the consent expressed by the learned counse...
Kannippan Arumugan Vs The Assistant Commissioner ST
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.3290 and 3291 of 2026 Mr.Kannippan Arumugan Sole Proprietor of Tvl. P A TRADERS No.1A/2, Munniyappan Nagar Main Road, Selliyamman Nagar Extn, Nerkunram Chennai. ... Petitioner Vs. The Assistant Commissioner (ST) Saligramam Assessment Circle, Central 1, Chennai Central No.307, 3rd Floor, Mylapore Taluk office Building, Greenways Road, Chennai-600 028. ... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records and seeking quash of the Impugned Order in Original vide GSTIN 33ACXPA8247L1Z3/2022-23, dated 21.07.2025 along with DRC-07 Ref.No.ZD330725212398B on the file of the Respondent, as it is arbitrary and bad in law, with a consequential direction to the Respondent to permit rectification of the inadvertent error in GSTR-1 and drop the proceedings.For Petitioner : M...
A. VADIVEL Vs State rep By its, The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.M.P.No.1358 of 2026 in Crl.OP.No.35546 of 2025 A.Vadivel ... Petitioner Vs. State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Ramnatham Police Station, Cuddalore District. ... Respondent PRAYER : To relax the condition imposed to the petitioner that to relax the condition imposed in Paragraph 6(b) passed by this Court in Crl.OP.No.35546 of 2025. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Arasu Ganeshan For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed upon the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.35546 of 2025 dated 26.12.2025, passed by this Court to report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30a.m, until further orders.2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner has been regularly complying with the conditions imposed by this Court.3. Considering the said submission, the condition imposed by thisCourt in Crl.O.P....
Raman vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2026CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Raman ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Coimbatore. 2.The Thasildhar, Sulur Taluk office, Sulur, Coimbatore District. ... RespondentsPrayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to grant patta to the petitioner for the writ property at Coimbatore Registration District, Sulur Sub Registration district, Sulur Taluk, Kannampalayam Village, Sarvamatha Colony, S.F.No.307/2 which is an extent of 3 cents with house bearing HSD Patta No.1240/83-84 Land Part-6 bearing D.No.12/32 on the basis of representation to respondents 1 and 2 dated 20.03.2025 and 28.04.2025 with in time as stipulated by this Court.Page No.1 of 6 For Petitioner : Mr.M.Saravanakumar For Respondents : Mr.C.Jayaprakash Government Advocate *****ORDERThis Writ Petition has been filed to dir...
T.Rosy vs R.D.Aravind Kumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA and T.Rosy ..Petitioner Vs R.D.Aravind Kumar ..Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under section 482 of Cr.P.C to call for the records in CC.No. 6104/2021 on the file of the 13th Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Chennai and to quash the same. For Petitioner: No appearance For Respondent: Mr.G.PurusothamanOrderThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed to call for the records in CC.No. 6104/2021 on the file of the 13th Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Chennai and to quash the same. Page1 of 42. There is no representation for the petitioner.3. As per the e-Court status of the case in C.C.No.6104 of 2021 before the learned 13th Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Chennai which is as below, the petitioner has been acquitted:4. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. Index: Yes/NoSpe...
S.Syed Usman vs the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR in Syed Usman ... Petitioner Vs. The State Rep.by Inspector of Police, Villupuram District. ... Respondents PRAYER : This petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to grant extension of time to the petitioner to execute sureties imposed by this Court by an order made in Crl.OP.No.26605 of 2025 dated 02.01.2026. For Petitioner : Mr.I.V.Kabilan For Respondent : Mr.S.Udaya Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to extend the time to comply the conditions as per the order of this Court in Crl.O.P.No.26605 of 2025 dated 02.01.2026.2. Heard both sides.3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this petition is ordered and time is extended by one week to the petitioner to comply theconditions as ordered by this Court, from the date on which, the ordercopy made ready. Vv To1. The Inspector of Police, Villupuram District. 2.The Public Prosecu...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »