Chennai Court August 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Chettinad Cement Corporation Limited vs Mam Ramaswamy Chettiar Charita ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASOrder reserved on : 04.08.2025 Order pronounced on : 29.08.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI & CMP.No.11846 of 2025 Chettinad Cement Corporation Limited, Rani Seethai Hall Building 603, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 006. ..Petitioner Vs. 1.MAM Ramaswamy Chettiar Charitable Trust Represented by its Trustee Mr.A.C.Muthiah, Chettinad House, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai 600 028. 2.M.A.M.R.Muthiah 3.Geetha Muthiah ..Respondents Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the order dated 14.02.2025 passed by the II Additional City Civil Court, Chennai in I.A.No.2 of 2023 in O.S.No.8652 of 2021.For Petitioner : Mr.R.Jawaharlal for Mr.T.Balaji For Respondents : Mr.Ravi Senior Counsel for Mrs.S.Indumathi for R1 No appearance for RR2 and 3ORDERst The 1 defendant in O.S.No.8652 of 2024, aggrieved by the dismissal of his application in I.A.No.2 of 2023, is before this Court with the ab...
The Government of Tamil Nadu, Vs N.Renuka devi,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
C.M.P.No.13907 of 2025 in W.A.SR.No.59970 of 2025R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDK.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.[Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.] This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 298 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.3. Though the sole respondent has been served and her name and address shown in the cause list, none appears for the respondent.4. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.5. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. [R.S.K., J.] [K.G.T, J.] 29.08.2025 KST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Bhagyaraj Jaganathan vs Aruna Devi a.D
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved on:22.08.2025 Pronounced on: 29.08.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI Bhagyaraj Jaganathan Petitioner Vs Aruna Devi A.D. Respondent PRAYER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order dated 13.11.2024 passed in I.A. No.2 of 2022 in O.P. No.2030 of 2022 on the file of the IV Additional Family Court at Chennai. For Petitioners : Mr.Suchit Anant Palande For Respondents : Mr.R.V.Lakshmipathy **********ORDERThe husband challenges the order of interim maintenance awarded by the IV Additional Family Court, Chennai.2. I have heard Mr. Suchit Anant Palande, learned counsel for the petitioner/ husband and Mr.R.V.Lakshmipathy, learned counsel for the respondent/wife.3. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitionerhas sought for dissolution of marriage and filed HMOP.No.2030 of 2022. Pending the said divorce petition, the respondent/wife has filed an App...
Vaidhiyanathan vs the State Represented by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28.08.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR CRL.RC.Nos.1354, 1368 & 1372 of 2017, and CRL.M.P.Nos.13357 & 13339 of 2017 and 10500 of 2019 CRL.RC.No.1354 of 2017 Vaidhiyanathan ...Petitioner Vs Criminal Revision filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, to set aside the order dated 12.07.2017 passed in Cr.M.P.No.655 of 2017 in C.C.No.1 of 2016 on the file of the Chief JudicialFor Petitioner(s): Mr.Abudukumar Rajathinam Senior Advocate for Mr.Rajagopal Vasudevan CRL.RC.No.1368 of 2017 Tmt.Revathy ...Petitioner Vs Criminal Revision filed to set aside the order dated 12.07.2017 passed in Cr.M.P.No.1157 of 2017 in C.C.No.1 of 2016 on the file of the Chief Judicial For Petitioner(s): Mr.Abudukumar Rajathinam Senior Advocate for Mr.Rajagopal Vasudevan CRL.RC.No.1372 of 2017 Abdul Rahim ...Petitioner VsCriminal Revision filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, t...
K.Sivakumar vs the Registrar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.08.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA and WMP.No.2070 of 2025 K.Sivakumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Registrar Madras University, Chepauk, Chennai - 5. 2.The Vice Chancellor Convenor Committee, Madras University, Chepauk, Chennai - 5. ...Respondents Prayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, Directing the respondents to consider and promote the petitioner as Assistant Registrar in the panel prepared on 23.12.2021 on par with his colleagues and juniors and grant all attendant benefits including pay fixation, arrears together with seniority in the light of the orders passed this Honble Court in W.A.No.997 of 2018 and batch 08.03.2024 (para 72 (iv)and orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No.31425 of 2024 dated 25.10.2024 and consequently grantpromotion as Deputy Registrar in the panel for 2025-2026. For Petitioner :M/s.V.Vijayashankar For Resp...
The State of Tamilnadu, Vs C.Prakash,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-28-2025
C.M.P.No.5004 of 2025 in W.A.SR.No.137546 of 2023R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDK.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.[Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.] This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 151 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.3. Mr. S.N.Ravichandran takes notice for the respondent and he has no serious objection in allowing the petition.4. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.5. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. [R.S.K., J.] [K.G.T., J.] 28.08.2025 KST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Vs M/s. IL and FS Tamil Nadu Powe ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28.08.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN and CMP No.21741 of 2024 The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle 2(2), Appellant Vs IL & FS Tamil Nadu Power Company Ltd., New No.2, (Old No.21) 4th Floor, KPR Tower, 1st Street, Subba Rao Avenue, College Road, Chennai-600 006 Respondent PRAYER: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal A Bench Chennai, in ITA No.1990/Chny/2019, dated 3.8.2022. For Appellant: Mr.S.Abubacker Sidhic for Mr.T.Ravikumar Sr. Standing Counsel For Respondent: M/s.Tushar Jarwal Rahul Sateeja Joseph PrabakarJUDGMENT(Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard learned counsel for the appellant/Revenue and learned counsel for the respondent/assessee.2. At the outset, learned counsel for the Revenue fairlysubmits that it is a case having low tax e...
E.Natarajan vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 28.08.2025Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ E.Natarajan ...PetitionerVersus1.The District Collector, District Collector Office, Grand Southern Trunk Road, Venbakkam, Tamil Nadu 603 111. 2.Tahsildar, W4PG + 4P7, Chennai Trichy Highway, Chitlapakkam, West Tambaram, Chennai 600 045. ...Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to pass final order on the enquiry conducted vide Na.Ka.3998/2023/Aa4 dated 27.12.2023 within the time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Sundarraman For Respondents : Mr.S.J.Mohammed Sathik, Government AdvocateORDERBy consent of learned counsel on both sides, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.2. The relief sought in this writ petition is to direct the respondentsto pass final orders pursuant to the Proceedings dated 27.12.2023 bearing N...
The Official Assignee vs the Registrar General
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-28-2025
Application (IP) No. 51 of 2025 IN I.P.No. 25 of 2014DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.andC.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.This Application has been filed by the Official Assignee, seeking a direction against the respondents, the Registrar General Office of the Pay and Accounts Officer, Madras High Court to refund a sum of Rs.4,00,29,594/- remitted to the Government as 7% commission in I.P.No. 25 of 2014 and credit the said amount to the estate of Arjunlal Sunderdas, the insolvent in I.P.No. 2014 and for a direction against the Official Assignee not to make any further deduction from any collection of money or debt and not to remit then to the account of the second respondent including the amount set apart in I.P.No. 2014.2. In the report of the Official Assignee, it had been stated that ArjunlalSunderdas had been adjudicated as insolvent on 21.04.2014 on a creditor petition. His rights and claims arising in and out of insolvency vested with the Official Assignee. The Official Assignee took out 103 applications ...
Kittathal vs District Revenue Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.08.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ and WMP No.34281 of 2025 Kittathal : Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer, 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, 3.The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar, Tiruppur South Taluk, Tiruppur District : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 3rd respondent in online order dated 9.11.2024 in Application No.2024/0103/32/ 617796 and quash the same and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to restore the patta Nos.3422, 3421, 2915, 2914, 2873, 2737, 2874, 3420, 3087 in patta passbook and in the revenue records as per proceedings in T.R.2020/0103/32/ 287935 dated 31.12.2020 T.R.2020/0103/32/288938 dated 6.01.2021 for properties covered in partition deed in Doc.No.11304/2020 registered at Joint Sub Registrar Tiruppur District.For Petitioner : Mr.I.Abrar Md. Abdullah For R...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »