Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vaidhiyanathan vs the State Represented by

Vaidhiyanathan vs The State Represented by

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Aug 28, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1715671

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL RC/1354/2017

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vaidhiyanathan

Respondent

The State Represented by

Excerpt

.....aside the order dated 12.07.2017 passed in cr.m.p.no.655 of 2017 in c.c.no.1 of 2016 on the file of the chief judicialfor petitioner(s): mr.abudukumar rajathinam senior advocate for mr.rajagopal vasudevan crl.rc.no.1368 of 2017 tmt.revathy ...petitioner vs criminal revision filed to set aside the order dated 12.07.2017 passed in cr.m.p.no.1157 of 2017 in c.c.no.1 of 2016 on the file of the chief judicial for petitioner(s): mr.abudukumar rajathinam senior advocate for mr.rajagopal vasudevan crl.rc.no.1372 of 2017 abdul rahim ...petitioner vscriminal revision filed under sections 397 and 401 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973, to set aside the order dated 12.07.2017 passed in cr.m.p.no.799 of 2016 in c.c.no.1 of 2016 on the file of the chief judicial for petitioner(s): mr.e.aadith vijay for mr.purushothamancommon orderthese criminal revisions have been filed by the petitioners to set aside the order dated 12.07.2017 passed in c.c.no.1 of 2016 on the file of the chief judicial magistrate, villupuram. 2.in view of the order passed in crl.o.p.no.20398 of 2019, no separate orders are required to be passed in the revision petitions and the revisions petitions are allowed. consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 28.08.2025 index:yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation:yes/no pam to 1.the chief judicial magistrate, villupuram. 2.the additional superintendent of police, crime branch c.i.d., villupuram range, villupuram. (crime no.5 of 2014). 3.the public prosecutor, high court of madras.n.sathish kumar, j.pam crl.rc.nos.1354, 1368 & 1372 of 2017, and crl.m.p.nos.13357 & 13339 of 2017 and 10500 of 2019 28.08.2025

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28.08.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR CRL.RC.Nos.1354, 1368 & 1372 of 2017, and CRL.M.P.Nos.13357 & 13339 of 2017 and 10500 of 2019 CRL.RC.No.1354 of 2017 Vaidhiyanathan ...Petitioner Vs Criminal Revision filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, to set aside the order dated 12.07.2017 passed in Cr.M.P.No.655 of 2017 in C.C.No.1 of 2016 on the file of the Chief Judicial

For Petitioner(s): Mr.Abudukumar Rajathinam Senior Advocate for Mr.Rajagopal Vasudevan CRL.RC.No.1368 of 2017 Tmt.Revathy ...Petitioner Vs Criminal Revision filed to set aside the order dated 12.07.2017 passed in Cr.M.P.No.1157 of 2017 in C.C.No.1 of 2016 on the file of the Chief Judicial For Petitioner(s): Mr.Abudukumar Rajathinam Senior Advocate for Mr.Rajagopal Vasudevan CRL.RC.No.1372 of 2017 Abdul Rahim ...Petitioner Vs

Criminal Revision filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, to set aside the order dated 12.07.2017 passed in Cr.M.P.No.799 of 2016 in C.C.No.1 of 2016 on the file of the Chief Judicial For Petitioner(s): Mr.E.Aadith Vijay for Mr.Purushothaman

COMMON ORDER

These Criminal Revisions have been filed by the petitioners to set aside the order dated 12.07.2017 passed in C.C.No.1 of 2016 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Villupuram. 2.In view of the order passed in CRL.O.P.No.20398 of 2019, no separate orders are required to be passed in the revision petitions and the revisions petitions are allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 28.08.2025 Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation:Yes/No pam To 1.The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Villupuram. 2.The Additional Superintendent of Police, Crime Branch C.I.D., Villupuram Range, Villupuram. (Crime No.5 of 2014). 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

pam CRL.RC.Nos.1354, 1368 & 1372 of 2017, and CRL.M.P.Nos.13357 & 13339 of 2017 and 10500 of 2019 28.08.2025

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial