Chennai Court April 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
P.Sathish vs the Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 01.04.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN P.Sathish ... Petitioner Vs1. The Superintendent of Police, Ranipet, Ranipet District.2. The Inspector of Police,Arakkonam Town Police Station, Ranipet, Ranipet District. ... Respondents Prayer:Criminal Original Petition filed under 528 of BNSS., 2023, directing the first and second respondents to not to harass the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Sandeep For Respondents : Mr.A.Gopinath, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed for directing the respondents not to harass the petitioner.2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the respondents police harassed the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for therespondents police submits that on the complaint given by the defacto complainant against the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending in C.S.R.No.430 of 2025 on the file of the ...
The Superintending Engineer Vs The Inspector of labour
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2025
WMP.No.13325 of 2025 in WP.No.23551 of 2014M.DHANDAPANI, J.This Court ordered notice to the respondents on the earlier occasion but service has not been effected till date.2. In view of the above, thepetitioner is permitted to take fresh notice to the respondents through substituted service by way of paper publication in any one of the Tamil daily in local edition at Tamil Nadu on or before 20.04.2025 by indicating the hearing date on 25.04.2025.3. Post the matter on 25.04.2025 for filing proof of service. 01.04.2025 rli https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M/S.Ganesh Lakshmi vs the Chief Engineer (Nh)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 01.04.2025CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY M/s.Ganesh Lakshmi, Construction India (P) Ltd., Rep. by its Director, R.Veerakumar, No.95, Saliyankattupallam, Muthur Post, Kangayam Taluk, Tiruppur District 638 105. ... Petitioner/versus/1. The Chief Engineer (NH), HRS Campus, No.76, Sardar Patel Road, Guindy, Chennai - 600 025.2. The Superintending Engineer (NH), Omalur Main Road, Narasothipatty, Alagapuram Post, Salem - 636 004.3. The Divisional Engineer (NH), No.6, A.T.T. Colony, V.O.C Park Road, Coimbatore - 641 018. ... RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to issue work site inspection certificate to the petitioner for the tender notification in Tender Notice No.21/HDO/NH/2024-25/Dated 14.03.2025 forthwith and pass orders. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Anandkumar. For Respondents : Mr.V.Venkata Seshaiya, Go...
R.Dhinakar Ajay vs M.Suruthi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 01.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA and R.Dhinakar Ajay ...Petitioner Vs. M.Suruthi ...Respondent PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order in IA.No.3 of 2022 in OP.No.2266 of 2021 on the file of the IV Additional Principal Family Court at Chennai, order dated 30.01.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.L.Pupshparadhakrishnan For Respondent : M/s.R.Varalakshmi for caveatorORDERThe Civil Revision Petition is filed to set aside the order in IA.No.3 of 2022 in OP.No.2266 of 2021 on the file of the IV Additional Principal Family Court at Chennai, order dated 30.01.2023.2. Heard the learned counsels on either side.3. Since the main petition has been disposed of on 18.10.2024, nothing survives for further consideration in the above Civil Revision Petition.4. In view of the above, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected Mi...
V.Rathna vs Ravindhran
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2025
C.M.P.No.5418 of 2025 in CMA SR.No.52580 of 2024R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDA.D.MARIA CLETE, J.[Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.] This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 458 days in filing the above appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.3. Despite notice having been served, there has been no representation on behalf of the respondent.4. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.5. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. [R.S.K., J.] [A.D.M.C, J.] 01.04.2025 KST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The Management Of K.Sivasubramaniam Spinner (Pvt) Ltd., Vs K.Soundarar ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 01.04.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI and W.M.P.Nos.12562 & 12567 of 2019 and 28639, 28640, 28641 & 28642 of The Management of K.Sivasubramaniam Spinner (Pvt) Ltd. Nalligoundanpalayam (Pirivu), Thekkalur Pudupalayam Post, Avinashi Tk., Tirupur District 641 654, Rep. by its Whole Time Director. ... Petitioner in both WPs Vs. 1.K.Soundararajan ... Respondent in W.P.No.12279 of 2019 2.R.Prasath ... Respondent in W.P.No.12282 of 2019 Prayer in W.P.No.12279 of 2019 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the Labour Court, Coimbatore in I.D.No.567 of 2008 and quash its Award dated 20.12.2018 and preliminary Award dated 19.01.2016.Prayer in W.P.No.12282 of 2019 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the Labour Court, Coimbatore i...
Asha Vijayaraghavan Vs The Special District Revenue Officer (Land Acqu ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 01.04.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Writ Petition No.13573 of 2021 and WMP Nos.14441 & 14444 of 2021 Asha Vijayaraghavan . Petitioner -Vs-1.The Special District Revenue Officer (Land Acquisition) Tamil Nadu Road Development Scheme-II (Chennai Peripheral Road Project) Economic Offneces Section (SIDCO) Thiru vi ka industrial Estate Alandur Road Guindy Chennai 600 032. 2.The Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition) Chennai Peripheral Road Project (Unit 1) Ponneri-601 204 Ponneri Taluk, Thiruvallur District. 3.Krishnaveni Ammal 4.E.Munusamy .. RespondentsPrayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 1st respondent in the Award proceedings No.11/2020 in NaKa.No.A2 / 69 / 2019 dated 19.2.2021 and quash the portion of the Award withholding compensation amount of Rs.44,54,093.30 payable to the petitioner ...
The Secretary to Government vs a. Murali
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 01.04.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE1. The Secretary to Government Municipal Administration & Water Supply Department Government of Tamil Nadu Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.2. The Director of Town Panchayat Kuralagam, 4th Floor, Chennai 600 108.3. The District Collector Erode District, Erode. .. Appellants Vs.1. A.Murali2. The Executive OfficerModakurichi Town Panchayat Erode District 638 104. .. Respondents Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the order made in W.P.No.9299 of 2020 dated 15.03.2022. For the Appellants : Mr.R.Neelakandan Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.M.Murali Government Advocate For the Respondents : Mr.M.Guruprasad for R1 Mr.C.Selvaraj Additional Government Pleader for R2JUDGMENT(Judgment of the Court was authored by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.) This intra-Court appeal has been filed by the Secretary to the Gov...
A.Hajimohamed Vs The Government of TamilNadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 01.04.2025Coram:THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN A.Hajimohamed ...Petitioner Vs.1. The Government of Tamilnadu rep. By its Secretary to Government Social Welfare and Women Empowerment Dept., Fort St.George, Chennai2. The Director of Social Welfare and Women Empowerment, o/o the Directorate of Social Welfare, No.1, Panagal Maligai Building, 2nd Floor, Jennis Road, Saidapet, Chennai 600 0153. The District Project Officer, (Integrated Child Development Services Scheme) District Project Office, Villupuram4. Child Development Project Officer,Villupuram (Urban), Villupuram ...Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to consider for appointment on compassionate ground by considering the petitioner's representation dated 06.04.2022 within the time stipulated by this Court. Page 1 / 9 For Petitioner : Mr.V.S.Jagade...
The Managing Director, Vs Vanajamunian,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 01.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P.Nos.15989 of 2018 and 18389 of 2021 The Managing Director, M/s.State Express Transport Corporation, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-600 002. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Vanajamunian 2.The Presiding Officer, The Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Puducherry. ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the award passed by the second respondent in I.D.No.101 of 2012 dated 03.03.2018. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Kathiresan For Respondents : Mr.S.Kasirajan for R1 R2-CourtORDERThe petitioner, namely, State Express Transport Corporation, is before this Court challenging the award dated 03.03.2018 passed in I.D.(L).No.101 of 2012 by the second respondent/Labour Court.2. By the said award, the Labour Court has allowed the IndustrialDispute filed by the first respondent dire...
- ‹ Prev
- 860
- 861
- 862
- 863
- 864
- 865
- 866
- 867
- 868
- 870
- Next ›
- Last »