V.Rathna vs Ravindhran

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Apr 01, 2025

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1890558

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1890558
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice R. Suresh Kumar,Honourable Dr.Justice a.D.Maria Clete
Decided On: Apr 01, 2025
Case Number: CMP/5418/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

V.Rathna

Respondent

Ravindhran

Excerpt

c.m.p.no.5418 of 2025 in cma sr.no.52580 of 2024r.suresh kumar, j.anda.d.maria clete, j.[order of the court was made by r.suresh kumar, j.] this civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 458 days in filing the above appeal.2. heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.3. despite notice having been served, there has been no representation on behalf of the respondent.4. having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.5. registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. [r.s.k., j.] [a.d.m.c, j.] 01.04.2025 kst https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Full Judgment

C.M.P.No.5418 of 2025 in CMA SR.No.52580 of 2024

R.SURESH KUMAR, J.

AND

A.D.MARIA CLETE, J.

[Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.] This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 458 days in filing the above appeal.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

3. Despite notice having been served, there has been no representation on behalf of the respondent.

4. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.

5. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. [R.S.K., J.] [A.D.M.C, J.] 01.04.2025 KST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties V.Rathna vs Ravindhran Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice R. Suresh Kumar,Honourable Dr.Justice a...