Chennai Court April 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ramasamy vs the State Rep by, Station House Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 01.04.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHANRamasamy ... Petitioner Vs. The State represented by, The Station House Officer, Kariyalur Police Station, Kallakurichi District. (Crime No.68 of 2025). ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail, in connection with the Crime No.68 of 2025, pending investigation on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Maha Vishnu For Respondent : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 15.03.2025, seeking bail in Crime No.68 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 4(1)(C), 4(1-A)(ii) of Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, 2024.2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found to be in illegal possession of 20 litres of illicit arrack. Hence, ...
Eternal Renewables Pvt Ltd vs the Chairman
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 01.04.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and W.M.P.No.13048 of 2025 ETERNAL RENEWABLES PVT LTD., 25, DEVANGAPURAM, MAHALINGAPURAM POST, POLLACHI TALUK, COIMBATORE - 642 002. REPD BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY A.VARATHARAJAN. ... Petitioner Vs CHENNAI - 600 002. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to refund Rs.5,00,000/- payable to the petitioner towards refundable security deposit. For Petitioner : Mr.S.P.Parthasarathy For R1 to R3 : Ms.R.Preethika for Mr.D.R.ArunkumarORDERThis writ petition is with a prayer to direct the respondents to refund the sum of Rs.5,00,000/- payable to the petitioner towards refundable security deposit.2. In this case, the petitioner submits that there seems to be a nametransfer and those parties have commenced the unit and seeks for refund. In the facts and circumstances of ...
Abdul Latheef vs State Rep. by the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 01.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Abdul Latheef ...Petitioner/Accused 4 Vs. State rep by The Inspector of Police, Kumarapalayam Police Station, Namakkal District. (Crime No.68 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER: This criminal original petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.68 of 2025 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.S.N.Arunkumar For Respondent : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl. Side) Page No.1 of 6ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 05.03.2025, seeking bail in Crime No.68 of 2025 registered for the offence under Section 9(B)(1)(b) of the Indian Explosives Act, 1884 @ Sections 4(b) and 5 of Explosives Act.2.It is the case of the prosecution that on 28.02.2025 at about 5.00 p.m., the respondent and their officia...
M/s.Compass Engineering Vs M/s.I.K.Building Solutions
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 01.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE M/s.Compass Engineering, rep. by its Managing Partner Chandrakanth Reddy .. Applicant vs M/s.I.K.Building Solutions and another .. RespondentsORDERThis application has been filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act seeking extension of time for the Arbitral Tribunal to pronounce an arbitral award by another period of six months.2.Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that even though in this application, six months extension has been sought for, he seeks for nine months extension on the ground that the respondents have filed an application before the Arbitral Tribunal seeking for forensic examination and on account of the same, further extension is sought for.ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J.vga 3.Lerned counsel for the respondents has stated no objection if nine months time is granted for the Arbitral Tribunal to pronounce an Arbitral Award.4.This Court, after giving ...
Chandhara Mowleeswaren @ Chandra vs the State Rep.by, the Inspector of ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2025
Crl.M.P. No.6338 of 2025 in Crl.O.P SR.No.9517 of 2025G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.Ordered as prayed for. 01.04.2025 kv Note to Office: Office is directed to number the Criminal Original Petition, if it is otherwise inorder and post the usual course.https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Varya Developers Private Limited vs the Commissioner
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 01.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH Varya Developers Private Limited Represented by its Director and Authorised Signatory Mr.D.Ramesh No.1, Viswananthan Street, Srinivasa Avenue Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai - 600 028. .... Petitioner Vs 1.The Commissioner Income Tax Department, Investigation No.46, Mahatma Gandhi Road Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034. 2.The Sub Registrar Woraiyur, Tiruchirappalli. 3.The Sub Registrar Thillai Nagar, Tiruchirappalli. 4.The Authorized Officer Union Bank of India No.38/39, Whites Road Royapettah, Chennai - 600 014. .... RespondentsPrayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to communicate to respondents 2 and 3 to delete the order of attachment dated 18.1.2017, and consequently direct respondents 2 and 3 to delete the entries relating to the attachment created over the property being the va...
Guru vs State Represented by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 01-04-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CRL OP NO.9610 of 2025Guru S/o. Babu ....Petitioner/Accused Vs The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Kanakammachatram Police Station Thiruvallur District (Cr. No.59 of 2025) ....Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police in Crime No.59 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr. D. Magesh For Respondent : Mr. S.Balaji Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThe petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 351(3) of BNS (Sections 294, 506 of IPC) r/w 75 of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, in Crime No.59 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. The case of the pro...
Punitha vs State Rep by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 01.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CRL OP NO. 9593 of 2025 Punitha Petitioner/A1 Vs The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Palaiyur Police Station, Mayiladuthurai District. (Crime No.47 of 2025) Respondent Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to enlarge the petitioner/Accused on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest in Crime No. 47 of 2025 pending on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : M/s.P.Krishna Moorthy For Respondent : Mr.S.Balaji Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThe petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 4(1)(A) of the TN Prohibition Act, in Crime No.47 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. The case of the prosecution is that the co-accused/A2 & A3were found transporting 620 bottles of illicit arrack, viz. 155 bottles c...
V.Ravi vs the Executive Engineer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 01-04-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD AND WMP NO. 13033 OF 20251. V.Ravi2. Iyappan 3.R.Shankar 4.T.Murugan 5.Kadiravan @ Velu6. Padmanaban 7.P.Murugan 8.C.Venkatesh9. Silambarasan10. Munirathinam11. Arumugam12. Chandarappa13. Govindan 14.M.Murugan 15.V.Narayanasamy 16.L.Babu17. Senthilkumar 18.K.Muniyappa 19.T.Kumar 20.R.Kumar 21.T.Rajendran 22.V.Balu 23.Muniventan @ Kutti24. Kuppusamy25.M.Murugesan Petitioners are the members of FMR 3 Hosur In Land Fishermen Co- Operative Society Ltd., No.60/76, Weavers Street, Hosur, Krishnagiri District. Petitioners Vs1. The Executive EngineerWater Resources Department (formerly PWD), Melpennaiyar Basin, Dharmapuri. 2.The Deputy Director of Fisheries Dharmapuri- 636 701. 3.The Assistant Director Of Fisheries Fisheries Department, Krishnagiri.4. FMR 3 Hosur In Land FishermenCo- Operative Society Ltd., Rep., by its Special Officer, No.60/76, Weavers Street, Hosur, Krishnagiri ...
Mipalloy Privae Limited vs the Chief Executive Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 01.04.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and WMP.No.12988 of 2025 Mipalloy Private Limited Represented by its Managing Director Mr.Sumit Dhody Registered Office at Plot Nos.C-14 & C-15 SIPCOT Industrial Park Irrungattukottai 602 117 Sriperumbudur Taluk Kancheepuram District Tamil Nadu ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chief Executive Officer Government e-Market Place 3rd Floor Jeevan Bharti Connaught Ln, Janpath Connaught Plance New Delhi 110 001. 2.The Secretary Union Ministry of Commerce & Industry Room No.426, Vanijya Bhawan New Delhi 110 011. ...RespondentsPrayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to give effect to petitioner business transfer deed dated 01.02.2025 and transfer all data, tender proposals, bid submissions and purchase orders from old Account No.806320001357263 of Mipalloy Proprietorship to Mipalloy P...
- ‹ Prev
- 860
- 861
- 862
- 863
- 864
- 865
- 867
- 868
- 869
- 870
- Next ›
- Last »