Chennai Court January 2017 Judgments
R. Ranga Babu and Others Vs. AR. Devendran Prop. Singer Sewing Machine
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 25 of Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent) Control Act 1960 as amended by Act 23 of 1973, against the order and decreetal order of Rent Control Appellate Authority (VIII Small Causes Court at Chennai) dated 25.10.2012 made in RCA.No.652 of 2010 reversing the Order and decreetal Order of eviction passed by the Rent Controller (XVI Small Causes Court, Chennai) dated 12.08.2010 in RCOP.No.1128 of 2009.) 1. The Revision Petitioners herein are the petitioners in trial Court has filed R.C.O.P.No. 1128 of 2009 on the file of the Learned Rent Controller/ Court of Small Causes at Chennai has filed the above RCOP.No.1128 of 2009 for the relief of own use and occupation under Section 10 (3) (a) (iii) of Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent) Control Act 1960 as amended by Act 23 of 1973 stated that the Revision Petitioners are the absolute owner of the subject property and the Land-lord of the premises bearing Old Door No. 118, New No. 86, Choo...
Tag this Judgment!Yasotha Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary to G ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus calling for the records in connection with the order of detention passed by the second respondent, in Order No.BCDFGISSSV 687/2016, dated 12.07.2016, against the detenu, viz.,Masthan, S/o.Polaiah, aged 41 years, who is confined at the Central Prison, Puzhal and to set aside the same and to direct the respondents to produce the detenu before this Court and to set him at liberty.) M. Jaichandren, J. 1. This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed by the wife of the detenu, namely, Masthan, S/o.Polaiah, aged 41 years, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the records, in Detention Order No.BCDFGISSSV No.687/2016, dated 12.07.2016, passed by the second respondent herein, detaining the detenu, under Section 3(1) of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Cyber Law Offenders, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Sand...
Tag this Judgment!R. Subramanian Vs. The Regional Transport Authority Nagapattinam and O ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
(Prayer in W.P.No.9998 of 2003: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent herein to forthwith consider and dispose of petitioner's application for renewal of permit dated 4.2.2003 in respect of petitioner's vehicle TN 60 F 1000 plying on the route Thiruthuraipoondi to Nagoor, by communicating the proceedings mentioned in the reference 1st cited in the Notice dated 12.3.2003. in W.P.No.50283 of 2006: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records dated 19.7.2006 of the 1st respondent herein in Appeal No.1063/2003 in Confirming the order of the 2nd respondent in R.No.A2/2534/2003 dated 21.5.2003 and to quash the same. in W.P.No.50289 of 2006: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the 1st respondent her...
Tag this Judgment!Rajendran Vs. Murugaiah
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the code of Civil Procedure, challenging the fair and decreetal order, dated 03.10.2013, made in I.A.No.247 of 2013 in O.S.No.7 of 2011, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Pudukottai.) 1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed challenging the fair and decreetal order, dated 03.10.2013, made in I.A.No.247 of 2013 in O.S.No.7 of 2011, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Pudukottai. 2. The petitioner is third defendant and the respondent is the plaintiff in the suit in O.S.No.7 of 2011 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Pudukottai. The respondent filed the suit for specific performance and also for permanent injunction. The petitioner remained ex-parte in the suit and an ex-parte decree was passed on 04.08.2011. Therefore, the petitioner filed I.A.No.247 of 2013 to condone the delay in filing application to set aside the ex-parte decree. According to the petitioner, the date of hearing of the suit was 09....
Tag this Judgment!C. Anand Raj Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Principal Secreta ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to strictly implement Bio Metric attendance system in all the Government Medical College Hospitals and attached institutions, Government Medical Colleges, Government District Head Quarters Hospitals, Government Hospitals, Taluk and Non Taluk Hospitals, ESI Hospitals/dispensaries and Primary Health Centers to monitor and regulate the attendance of all the staff working in the above hospitals, by strictly implementing the G.O.(Ms)No.277 Respondent No.1, dated 20.09.2012 within the time stipulated by this Court.) A. Selvam, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents to implement Bio-metric Attendance System in all Government Medical College Hospitals, District Headquarters Hospitals and Taluk Headquarters Hospitals in pursuance of G.O.(Ms)No.277, Health and Famil...
Tag this Judgment!Chithra Vs. Chinnammal (died) and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code against the fair and decreetal order dated 03.02.2016 made in I.A.No.416 of 2011 in O.S.No.349 of 1994 on the file of the III Additional Subordinate Court, Coimbatore.) 1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the fair and decreetal order dated 03.02.2016 made in I.A.No.416 of 2011 in O.S.No.349 of 1994 on the file of the III Additional Subordinate Court, Coimbatore. 2. The mother-in-law of the petitioner herein viz., Chinnammal as a plaintiff has filed a suit in O.S.No.349 of 1994 for partition and separate possession in respect of A to E schedule property. During her lifetime, there was a compromise decree, in which, they have entered into a compromise in respect of Item Nos.A, B and C. After her death, other legal heirs of Chinnammal, who are respondents 1 to 5 herein, succeeded the property as per the Will. Now in pursuance of the compromise decree, they filed I.A.No.416 of 2011 for passing ...
Tag this Judgment!M/s. Acolyte Soft Private Limited Rep by its Manager Mr. Sankar Sresht ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
(Prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records, the order dated 24.06.2016 in Crl.M.P.No.6794 of 2016 on the file of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Chennai and quash the same as illegal, incompetent, unconstitutional and further forbear the 3rd respondent from interfering with the possession of the petitioner at the addresses stated in the affidavit without due process of law.) S. Manikumar, J. 1. Claiming to be a tenant in respect of the property Sreshta Pankajam, IV Floor, No.10, 23/8, Raja Street Extension, Mandaveli, Chennai - 600 028, under respondents 1 and 2, joint owners, who had mortgaged the same with M/s.Reliance Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd, New Delhi and further contending inter alia that a statutory tenant cannot be evicted without due process of law, order dated 24.06.2016 passed by the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Allikulam, Chennai-3,...
Tag this Judgment!V. Muthu Raj Vs. The Managing Director, Metropolitan Transport Corpora ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ Of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the respondents, especially the second respondent relating to his proceedings made in Memorandum No.20651/ Sa Pi(O Na) 1/ Ma Po Ka/ 2004 dated 15.12.2012 and quash the same as null and void and illegal and invalid and consequently directing the respondents, especially the second respondent to re-instate the petitioner in service with all service and monetary benefits.) 1. This writ petition has been filed for issuance of writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the proceedings of the second respondent made in Memorandum No.20651/ Sa Pi(O Na) 1/ Ma Po Ka/ 2004 dated 15.12.2012 and for consequential direction to re-instate the petitioner in service with all service and monetary benefits. 2. The petitioner, who was employed as a Conductor in the respondent Corporation, was served with a charge memo dated 10.11.2004 with the following three charges: ...
Tag this Judgment!Petitioner Vs. Respondent
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
1. The Petitioner/Appellant/State has preferred the instant Miscellaneous Petition before this Court seeking to condone the delay of 3432 days in preferring an Appeal in Crl.A.Sr.No.2289 of 2017 for enhancement of sentence as against the Judgment in S.C.No.200 of 2006 dated 20.07.2007 passed by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dharmapuri. 2. According to the Petitioner/Appellant, the trial Court in S.C.No.200 of 2006 on 20.07.2007 delivered the Judgment. In the affidavit in Crl.M.P.No.1012 of 2017, the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Pennagaram Sub Division, Dharmapuri District, at paragraph 3, had averred that he made a requisition to the Additional Public Prosecutor of the Additional Sessions Court, Dharmapuri and obtained an opinion on 28.11.2016 from him. Thereafter, the proposal together with the legal opinion was submitted to the Superintendent of Police, Dharmapuri District through proper channel. In turn, the Superintendent of Police, Dharmapuri District had forwarded th...
Tag this Judgment!Muthukumar @ Vellaian Vs. The Secretary to Government, Home Prohibitio ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the entire records connected with the detention order of the respondent No.2 in No.43/BCDFGISSSV/2016, dated 01.07.2016 and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu by name Muthukumar @ Vellaiah, S/o. Late.Meenatchisundaram, aged about 24 years detained in Madurai Central Prison, before this Court and set him at liberty forthwith.) R. Subbiah, J. The petitioner is the detenu, by name Mr.Muthukumar @ Vellaian, aged about 24 years. The detenu has been detained, as per the order of the secondrespondent, dated 01.07.2016, under Section 2(f) of the Tamilnadu Act 14 of1982, branding him as ?Goonda?. Challenging the same, the petitioner hascome up with this Habeas Corpus Petition. 2. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned State Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents. We have also perused the rec...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »