Chennai Court January 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
B. Radhakrishnan Vs. S. Vijayalakshmi and Another
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
(Prayer: Original Petition No 557 of 2002 was filed under Sections 232 and 276 of Indian Succession Act, XXXIX of 1925 for the grant of letters of Administration. Against this petition a Caveat was filed on 30.04.2013 by the Caveators As per order of this Court dated 01.02.2010, the Original Petition No.552 of 2002 was converted into Testamentary Original Suit No.13 of 2010. C.S.No.374 of 2007: Plaint filed under Section IV Rule 1 of Original Side Rules Read with Order VII Rule 1 of CPC praying for final decree appointing Advocate Commissioner to divide the schedule property by metes and bounds and to pay the cost of the suit.) Common Judgment: 1. The petition in OP.No.557 of 2002 originally filed for the grant of Letters of Administration has been converted as testamentary suit being TOS.No. 13 of 2010 in view of the caveat filed by the defendants therein. 2. The Suit in C.S.No.374 of 2007 has been filed for final decree appointing Advocate Commissioner to divide the schedule property...
M. Arulselvam Vs. The District Adidravida and Tribal, Welfare Officer, ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
(Prayer:Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to issue Order of appointment to the petitioner, appointing him as a Cook based on the Interview held on 18.02.2011 with all consequential monetary and other service benefits. 1. The Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to issue Order of appointment to the petitioner, appointing him as a Cook based on the Interview held on 18.02.2011 with all consequential monetary and other service benefits. 2. The petitioner has passed SSLC and registered his name in the District Employment Exchange, Perambalur on 23.02.2000 and the same is renewed in the month of February 2012. The petitioner's name was sponsored by the District Employment Exchange, Perambalur for the post of 'Cook'. The petitioner had appeared for an interview held on 18.02.2011 alongwith certificates regarding Age, Educational Qualification, Employmen...
J. Tamilarasan Vs. The District Adidravida and Tribal Welfare Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
(Prayer:Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to issue Order of appointment to the petitioner, appointing him as a Cook based on the Interview held on 18.02.2011 with all consequential monetary and other service benefits.) 1. The Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to issue Order of appointment to the petitioner, appointing him as a Cook based on the Interview held on 18.02.2011 with all consequential monetary and other service benefits. 2. The petitioner has passed 8th Standard and registered his name in the District Employment Exchange, Perambalur on 03.09.1992 and the same was renewed in the month of September 2013. The petitioner's name was sponsored by the District Employment Exchange, Perambalur for the post of 'Cook'. The petitioner has appeared for an interview held on 18.02.2011 alongwith certificates regarding Age, Educational Qualificatio...
M. Manikandan Vs. The Sub Registrar, Madurai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the 1st respondent in registering the impugned cancellation deed of sale in Document No.876/2000 dated 25.02.2000 executed by the 2nd respondent and quash the same and further direct the 1st respondent to make corresponding entry in the Book No.1 of his office and pass orders on merits.) 1. This writ petition has been filed by the writ petitioner seeking a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the 1st respondent in registering the impugned cancellation deed of sale in Document No.876/2000 dated 25.02.2000 executed by the 2nd respondent and quash the same and further direct the 1st respondent to make corresponding entry in the Book No.1 of his office and pass orders on merits. 2. The case of the petitioner is that he is the owner of nanja lands to an extent of 25 cents on the western side in Re-survey No.115/10...
S. Ganesan and Another Vs. Murugaiah Rajaliar and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.84 of 1996, dated 25.02.1997 on the file of the Additional Sub Judge, Nagapattinam confirming the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.183 of 1993 dated 28.07.1995 on the file of the Court of District Munsif, Mannargudi.) 1. Water, which is gift of nature, contrary to its character, burns while asked to be shared. Water sharing is presently the most vexed question all over the world. Dispute over water has become a common phenomena among nations and inter-state. Even hamlets within the State are not spared from this malady. The subject matter of this second appeal is one such case, where two villages of erstwhile Thanjavur District, the rice bowl of Tamil Nadu, fighting for their share of water for irrigation. 2. The Moovanallur Villagers are the plaintiffs. The suit is filled in the representative capacity on behalf of the Moovanallur Villagers to declare the ryots o...
M. Gaja and Another Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
(Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents 1 to 3 to count half of service rendered by the petitioner as Social Forestry Worker from 16.10.1983 to 06.08.2009 on temporary basis along with the regular service from 07.08.2009 till the date of retirement on 31.01.2017 as qualifying service for the purpose of conferment of pension and to direct the respondents to send pension proposal to the fourth respondent to authorize the same with all consequential benefits within the time frame.) Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents 1 to 3 to count half of the service rendered by the petitioner as Social Forestry Worker from 01.09.1983 to 06.08.2009 on temporary basis along with regular service from 07.08.2009 till the date of retirement on 31.05.2010 as qualifying service for the purpose of conferment of pension and to direct the...
Union of India represented by the Chief Post Master General and Others ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
(Prayer: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the 1st respondent relating to the order made in O.A.No.683 of 2003 dated 21.03.2005, quash the same.) V. Parthiban, J. 1. The writ petition has been filed against the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, dated 21.03.2005 in O.A.No.683 of 2004 allowing the application filed by the applicant therein, who is the second respondent herein. 2. The applicant in the original application approached the Tribunal seeking for the following relief:- In view of the facts and grounds mentioned above, the Applicant prays that this Hon'ble Court may pleased to direct the respondents to include the name of the Applicant in the Dovetailed List and to give him appointment in GDS cadre in the existing vacancy or in future vacancy. 3. The claim of the applicant was considered and relief was granted to him as prayed for by a Divisi...
R. Muthukrishnan Vs. The Registrar (Administration) High Court of Judi ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
(Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 07.01.2015 rendered in W.P.No.66 of 2015.) Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J. 1. This Writ Appeal is instituted under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, calling in question the correctness of the Order and Judgment rendered by our learned brother T.S.Sivagnanam,J., dismissing the writ petition instituted by the appellant herein, calling in question the correctness of the communication bearing ROC 3080/2014/DS dated 21st July, 2014 issued by the Registrar (Administration), High Court of Madras, Chennai, informing the writ petitioner that the replacement of tube lights will be undertaken only in the corridor (common areas) and not in the Chambers of the Advocates. 2. The facts which are only relevant for our enquiry are that the writ petitioner appears to be a co-allottee of Chamber No.281 of New Additional Law Chambers situated in the High Court premises at Chennai. He seems to have addressed a communication to...
M. Thangadurai Vs. The District Collector, Madurai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the office bearers of the third respondent from interfering with the petitioner's lawful right and discharging his duties as clerk as per the order dated 08.08.2011 with the third respondent office.) 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the office-bearers of the 3rd respondent from discharging his duties as Clerk, as per order dated 08.08.2011. 2. The case of the petitioner is that he is the resident of Mullipallam Village and he studied upto 12th standard at Vivekananda Higher Secondary School, Thiruvedagam. He was doing agricultural work and thereby eaking out his lively hood. It is the further case of the petitioner that on 05.08.2011 one Sumathi, who was working as the clerk of respondent Panchayat, was promoted and transferred to different place, hence, the post of clerk felt vacant....
M. Vijayan Vs. The Agricultural Production Commissioner and Principal ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the first respondent relating to impugned orders of the Government passed in fbj vz;.18201/Ntep4(2)/2012-2 dated 03.05.2013 and quash the same and consequently direct the Government to regularise services of the petitioner as per the proposals sent by the Commissioner of Agriculture in his letter No.Nt.mg1/70289/2012 dated 05.07.2012 and sanction arrear increments within a specified time frame that may be fixed by this Court.) 1. The prayer in the writ petition is for a writ of Certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the first respondent relating to impugned orders of the Government passed in TAMIL (2)/2012-2 dated 03.05.2013 and quash the same and consequently direct the Government to regularise services of the petitioner as per the proposals sent by the Commissioner of Agriculture in his letter No.Nt.mg1/70289/2012 dated 0...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »