Chennai Court September 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.M. Ponnappan and Another Vs. J. Bennet
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-16-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order passed in I.A.No.200 of 2011 in O.S.No.81 of 2010, dated 1.6.2016, on the file of the Principal District Judge, Tuticorin.) 1. The revision Petitioner has filed this revision challenging the order passed in I.A.No.200 of 2011 in O.S.No.81 of 2010, dated 1.6.2016, on the file of the Principal District Judge, Tuticorin. 2. According to the Petitioner, the respondent filed a suit in O.S.No.81 of 2010, on the file of the Principal District Judge, Tuticorin for recovery of a sum of Rs.1,12,40,142/- with 12% interest per annum till date of filing of suit and also with 6% interest from the date of suit till the date of realization of the principal amount of Rs.82,70,892/-. 3. Written statement was also filed by the defendant/K.M.Ponnappan. Thereafter the respondent herein/Plaintiff filed I.A.No.200 of 2011 before the Principal District Court, Thoothukudi to implead Leela Impex(P) Limited a...
K.G. Parthasarathy and Another Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep by the ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-16-2016
(Prayer: The writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to (i) the notice bearing Na.Ka.No.08/2013/O.R. Road/Kancheepuram, dated 12.9.2013 issued under section 15(2) of the Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001 by the second respondent, (ii) the notice bearing G.O.Ms.No.161, Highways and Minor Ports (HF2) Department, dated 16.12.2014 issued under Section 15(1) of the Tamilnadu Highways Act, 2001 by the first respondent, (iii) the 3 notices bearing Na.Ka.No.08/2013/O.R.Road/Kancheepuram, dated 27.4.2015 issued by the fourth respondent under Section 16(2) of the Tamilnadu Highways Act, 2001 and (iv) the 3 notices bearing Na.Ka.No.08/2013/O.R.Road/Kancheepuram, dated 29.4.2015 issued under Sections 19(5) and (7) of the Tamilnadu Highways Act 2001 by the second respondent and to quash the same and consequently, to direct the respondents 1 to 4 to initiate fresh acquisit...
V. Vivekanandan Vs. The State Rep by its, The Inspector of Police, Ann ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-16-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 1st respondent to defreeze the current account of petitioner bearing No.225150050800293 maintained with the 2nd respondent bank and pass any other orders.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent to defreeze the current account of petitioner bearing No.225150050800293 maintained with the 2nd respondent bank and pass any other orders. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first respondent and the learned counsel appearing for the third respondent. 3. On the complaint given by one D.S.A.K. Textiles, the first respondent police are conducting enquiry in CSR No.311 of 2016 and during the enquiry, the first respondent police has issued a communication dated 20.08.2016 to the Branch Manager, Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank Ltd., Annur Branch, Coimbatore District for a direction to stop withdrawal of a sum of Rs....
Ragu @ Ragupathi and Others Vs. The Inspector of police, Chennai
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-16-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal has been filed under Section 374 (2) of Cr.P.C., as against the judgment dated 23.12.2009 in C.C.No.130 of 2004 passed by the learned Principal Special Judge, Principal Special Court under EC and NDPS Act, Chennai.) 1. This appeal has been filed by the appellants as against the judgment dated 23.12.2009 in C.C.No.130 of 2004 passed by the learned Principal Special Judge, Principal Special Court under EC and NDPS Act, Chennai. 2. The appellants herein have been arrayed as A1 to A3 and they have been convicted for the alleged offences under Section 8(c) r/w 29 and 21(c) of NDPS Act 1985, as amended by Act, 9/01, and they were sentenced to undergo 10 years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.1 lakh, in default to undergo 6 months rigorous imprisonment, for each offence, by the Trial Court. Aggrieved over the same, the appellants/accused have come forward with the present appeal before this Court. 3. The brief facts of the case of the prosecution are as f...
Subramani Vs. State rep. by the Inspector of Police, Tiruchirappalli D ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-16-2016
(Prayer:Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 of Cr.P.C. against the judgment, dated 17.09.2013, made in S.C.No.118 of 2009, by the Sessions cum Mahila Court, Tiruchirappalli.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.118 of 2009 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge (Mahila Court), Tiruchirappalli. The trial Court framed a charge against the appellant/accused under Section 304-B IPC. By judgment dated 17.09.2013, the trial Court convicted the appellant/ accused for the offence under Section 304-B IPC and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for six months. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, he is before this Court with this appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is as follows; (a) The deceased in this case was one Mrs.Meena. She is the wife of the appellant/accused. The marriage between them was celebrated on 24.10.2007. It is alleged that six months ...
Velaayudam Vs. Shenbagarajan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-15-2016
(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure decree and judgment dated 10.03.2015 in A.S.No.28 of 2014 on the file of the Principal District Court, Puducherry confirming, the judgment and decree dated 18.11.2014 passed in O.S.No.104 of 1993 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Court, Puducherry.) 1. The above Second Appeal arises against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.28 of 2014 on the file of the Principal District Court, Puducherry, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.104 of 1993 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Court, Puducherry. 2. The plaintiff is the appellant and the respondent was the defendant in the suit. The plaintiff filed the suit in O.S.No.104 of 1993 for delivery of possession. 3. The brief case of the plaintiff is as follows: (i) According to the plaintiff, he is the absolute owner of the suit property by virtue of a registered Sale Deed dated 27.11.1974 having purchased the same from one Vijayalak...
C. Suresh Ananth Vs. The Director, Tamil Nadu Fire and Rescue Services ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-15-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire files leading to the Suspension Order made in R.C. No. 431/B/2013 dated 08.02.2013 on the file of the second respondent and the order of rejection made in R.C. No. 3024/A4/2013 dated 12.09.2015 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same and direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner back in service as Assistant Divisional Fire Officer with back wages and other attendant benefits.) 1. The petitioner calls in question the order dated 12.09.2015 of the first respondent whereby the first respondent refused to interfere with the order of suspension dated 08.02.2013 passed by the second respondent. 2. While the petitioner was working as Assistant Divisional Fire Officer, on 06.02.2013 a case in Crime No. 2/AC/2013/CC-III was registered against him by the Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Chennai City for the offence ...
The Special Tahsildar (Adi Dravidar Welfare) and Another Vs. Ammini Ge ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-15-2016
(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, praying to set aside the judgment and decree in L.A.A. No.1 of 2001 dated 21.08.2009 on the file of the Sub Court, Kuzhithurai, allow the appeal.) 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree of Sub Court, Kuzhithurai in LAA No.1 of 2001 preferred against the award of the Special Tahsildar (Adi Dravider Welfare) and Land Acquisition Officer, Padmanabhapuram. 2. The Land Acquisition Officer has fixed compensation at the rate of Rs.1,438/- per cent on the basis of the documents in respect of land which was located 1.6 kilometers away from the acquired land. The award of the Land Acquisition Officer was challenged by the claimant / respondent before the Sub Court, Kuzhithurai. The Land Acquisition Tribunal fixed compensation at the rate of Rs.5,000/- per cent and modified the award of the Land Acquisition Officer. Aggrieved by the same, the Government has filed the present Second Appeal. 3. It is not in ...
R. Krishnan Vs. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Salem and Another
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-15-2016
(Prayer: Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 30.08.2011 in W.P.No.32530 of 2004 passed by the learned single Judge of this Court. Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, to condone the delay of 1686 days in filing the writ appeal.) Huluvadi G. Ramesh, J. This writ appeal is arising out of the order dated 30.08.2011 made in W.P.No.32530 of 2004, wherein, the learned single Judge has dismissed the writ petition and thereby confirmed the award of the first respondent - Labour Court in dismissing the appellant - workman from service. 2. The facts leading to the filing of this writ appeal are as follows: The appellant joined as a conductor on 11.03.1990 in Thiruvallur Transport Corporation. Subsequently, at his request, he was transferred to the second respondent Transport Corporation on 01.04.1996. While so, he was issued with a charge memo dated 05.06.1998 for his unauthorized absence from 21.05.1998. Ther...
Ghayazullah Vs. State Rep. By The Inspector of Police, Chennai
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C to pass an order of direction directing the respondent to enquire the case in Cr.No.787/2010 on the file of the respondent and to file a charge sheet and to take appropriate action.) 1. The petitioner has filed this petition to direct the respondent to enquire the case in Cr.No.787/2010 on the file of the respondent and to file a charge sheet and to take appropriate action. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent. 3. On the complaint lodged by the petitioner, the respondent police registered a case in Crime. No.787 of 2010 on 18.10.2010 for the offences under Sections 294(b), 323, 506(ii) IPC against the four accused and thereafter, the investigation did not proceed further. Therefore, the petitioner filed Crl.O.P.No.2853 of 2015 for a direction to the respondent police to complete the investigation in Crime No.787 of 2010 ...