Chennai Court September 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
V. Poojashri Vs. The Chairman, Admission Committee (UG), TANUVAS, Madh ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-19-2016
(Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of declaration, declaring the action of the first respondent refused to consider the highest achievement soft tennis sports certificates of the year 2012 to 2015 i.e.,) a. IX TH Junior National Soft Tennis Championship, Form II (Silver) for the academic year 2012-13 (160 points) b. XI TH Senior National Soft Tennis Championship, Form II (Silver) for the academic year 2013-14 (160 points) c. X TH Junior National Soft Tennis Championship, Form II (Gold) for the academic year 2014-15 (190 points) and refused to add the marks for the admission of Bachelor of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry - BVSc and AH (5 years). Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Science University, Chennai, for the academic year, 2016 to 2017 under Sports Quota, Girls as illegal and consequently direct the 1st respondent to consider the same and add the 350 marks along with 320 marks which is already awar...
P. Gomathi Vs. The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothuku ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-19-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to forbear the 4th respondent not to ply in the route permitted to the petitioner and by considering his representation dated 01.07.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed, seeking to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to forbear the 4th respondent not to ply in the route permitted to the petitioner and by considering his representation dated 01.07.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3. 3. The case of the petitioner is that he is running a Mini Bus in the name and style of "Lakshmi Mini Bus" and was allotted the route by the 2nd respondent on 09.02.2016, i.e., Kovilpatti Bus Stand to Alampatti, via., Lakshmi Mill, Maniyachi Vilakku, Thonukal Vilakku and Alampatti; that the 4th respondent is also running a Stage Carrier Mini Bus Service in the name an...
R. Paramasivan Vs. The Home Secretary Government of Tamilnadu Secretar ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-19-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to take immediate and necessary steps to entrust the case to the 5th respondent, an independent agency to conduct investigation of the murder of deceased) 1. Heard Mr.R.Sankarasubbu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.Rajarathinam, learned Public Prosecutor accepting notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3 and Mr.A.N.Thambidurai, learned Special Government Pleader accepting notice on behalf of the respondents 4 to 6. 2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus, to direct the 2nd respondent to take immediate and necessary steps to entrust the case to the 5th respondent, an independent agency to conduct investigation of the murder of deceased Ramkumar, S/o.Paramasivan. 3. This Court, at the very inception, pointed out to Mr.R.Sankarasubbu, learned counsel for the petitioner that the prayer sought...
Sembulingam Vs. The Secretary to Government, Prohibition and Excise De ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-19-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order of detention passed by the second respondent under No.8/BCDFGISSSV/2016, dated 01.03.2016, and quash the same and the detenu S.Suresh, Son of Sembulingam, aged 21 years who is detained in the District Prison and Borstal School, Pudukottai may be set at liberty.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The petitioner is the father of the detenu viz., Mr.S.Suresh, S/o.Sembulingam, aged about 21 years. The detenu has been detained, as per the order of the second respondent, dated 01.03.2016, under Section 2(f) of the Tamilnadu Act 14 of 1982, branding him as Goonda . Challenging the same, he has come up with this Habeas Corpus Petition. 2. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents. We have also perused the records carefully. 3. Though several grounds have...
D. Ramesh Vs. The Chief Engineer (Personnel) Tamil Nadu Generation and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-19-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 21.03.2016 requesting to include his acquiring higher qualification into his service register within a reasonable time as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court.) This petition has been filed, seeking to direct the respondents herein to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 21.03.2016 for inclusion of his higher qualification in his service register. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3. The case of the petitioner is that despite the fact that the Superintending Engineer, Dindigul, vide proceedings dated 23.02.2015, instructed the Executive Engineer, Vathlakundu to include the acquired higher qualification of the petitioner in the Service Register, no steps have been taken so far for including the addit...
P. Sivalingam Vs. G. Asokan and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-16-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 24.02.2016 passed in EOP No.5 of 2011 on the file of Principal District Judge, Dharmapuri.) 1. Challenging the order passed in EOP No.5 of 2011 on the file of Principal District Court, Dharmapuri, the petitioner has filed the above Civil Revision Petition. 2. The Election Original Petition in EOP No.5 of 2011 was filed by the revision petitioner under Sections 258, 259, 260 r/w Rule 122 of the Tamil Nadu Panchayat Act to declare the election of the first respondent as the President of the Kolagampatti Village Panchayat as null and void and to declare the petitioner as the successful candidate for the post of President of Kolagampatti Village Panchayat and to order recount of the votes polled. 3. The brief case of the petitioner is as follows: According to the petitioner, the election for the post of the President of Kolagampatti Village Panchayat was held on 19.10.2011 and in t...
Meganathan Vs. State by Inspector of Police Gobichettypalayam Police S ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-16-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under section 374 of Cr.P.C. against the judgment dated 25.6.2015 passed in S.C.No.58 of 2014 on the file of Sessions Court, (Magalir Neethimandram (Magalir Fast Track Court), Erode, Erode District.) A. Selvam, J 1. Challenge in this Criminal Appeal is to the convictions and sentences dated 25.6.2015 passed in Sessions Case No.58 of 2014 by the District and Sessions Court/Mahilar Neethimandram (Magalir Fast Track Court), Erode. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the deceased Kalamani is the wife of one Perumal. Both the deceased and accused by name Meganathan are having illicit intimacy for a period of 12 years and prior to 6 months from the date of occurrence, the deceased has abnegated the alleged relationship between her and accused and subsequently, she developed new illicit intimacy with one Gopal. Having enraged at the conduct of the deceased, with an intention to murder her, on 26.11.2013 at about 3 p.m, the accused directed the deceased to com...
S. Samadhuvam Vs. The District Collector, Theni District, Theni and Ot ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-16-2016
(Prayer: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the proceeding of 4th respondent in Roc.No.10012/2007/C1, dated 14.08.2007 and quash the same and consequently directing the respondents to issue the patta in favour of the petitioner for the land and building of 6 cents comprised in S.No.540 in Chinnamannur Town, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District, as per G.O.Ms.168 and also as per G.O.Ms.No.854, dated 25.12.2006.) M. Sathyanarayanan, J. 1. The Petitioner would state that he is a retired driver of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation and according to him, his father during his life time enjoyed 20 cents of land with 18 coconut trees in S.No.540 of Chinnamannur. He has also put up a superstructure in the said land, and he was in possession and enjoyment of the said house as well as vacant site, which totally measures 20 cents. Petitioner claims to have succeeded to his es...
R. Marimuthu Vs. State rep. by The Additional Superintendent of Police ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-16-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to call for the records in C.C.No.8 of 2002 on the file of XI Additional Special Court, CBI cases Court, Chennai and quash the same.) The petitioner is A8 in C.C.No.8 of 2002 on the file of XI Additional Special Court, CBI cases Court, Chennai and he has filed this petition to call for the records in the said case and quash the same. 2. Based on the complaints received and also on the basis of the source information, case was registered against the petitioner/A8 and others for the alleged commission of the offences punishable under Sections 120-B read with 420 and 420, 467, 468, 467 read with 471, 468 read with 471, 477-A IPC and Sections 7, 12 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The petitioner herein / A8 is facing trial along with the other accused persons for the above said offences. It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner herein is the promoter and Managing Direct...
Jeevadhasan Vs. The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivaganga ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-16-2016
Common Judgment V.M. Velumani, J. 1. These Writ Appeals have been filed challenging the orders of the learned Single Judge, dated 10.03.2015 and 21.07.2015, made in W.P.(MD)No.13124 of 2014 and W.P.(MD)No.654 of 2015 respectively. 2. Since common issues are involved in the writ appeals, they are heard together and disposed of by this common Judgment. 3. The parties are referred to as per their rank in the writ petitions. 4. The case of the petitioners is that the petitioner in W.P. (MD)No.13121 of 2014 filed the said writ petition seeking a direction to the first respondent to appoint him to the post of Jeep Driver in the Office of the second respondent in the light of G.O. (Ms)No.475, dated 02.05.1985 and based on his representation, dated 28.07.2014. The petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.654 of 2015 filed the said writ petition seeking a direction to the first respondent to appoint him to the post of Jeep Driver in the Office of the second respondent, pursuant to the interview held on 21.07.2...
- ‹ Prev
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- Next ›
- Last »