Chennai Court August 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M. Thiyagarajan Vs. The Commissioner, Karur
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-04-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to delete the property tax assessment in property tax assessment numbers 210572 and 210575 and demands in respect of the tax assessments at Town Survey No.210, 5th Block, 3rd Ward, Karur Town, Karur District on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 01.07.2016 in accordance with law.) 1. The petitioner's mother-in-law, namely, one Pappathi was the absolute owner of land and commercial complex in Town Survey No.210, 5th Block, 3rd Ward, Karur Town, Karur District. Originally, there were five shops and five assessments were made by the petitioner. Out of which, three shops were converted into a single shop and other two shops remain the same assessment number. In view of the subsequent development, on the basis of the request made by the petitioner's mother-in-law, the respondent through his proceedings dated 06.02.2000, deleted two asses...
Alex M.Mani Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District Police ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-04-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents from interfering with the petitioners business of Ayurvedic Panchakaram Treatment Centre in the name and style of "Honey Ayurvedic Spa" Sivanandi Road, Kodaikanal in the light of order passed by this Honourable Court in W.P.No.24629 of 2014 batch dated 09.12.2014 etc. and order passed in W.P(MD)Nos.8799 and 8800 of 2015 dated 05.06.2015.) 1. The writ petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents from interfering with the petitioner's business of Ayurvedic Panchakaram Treatment Centre in the name and style of "Honey Ayurvedic Spa" Sivanandi Road, Kodaikanal in the light of order passed by this Court in W.P.No.24629 of 2014 batch dated 09.12.2014 etc. and the order passed in W.P(MD)Nos.8799 and 8800 of 2015 dated 05.06.2015. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Go...
Yogesh Kumar Agarwalla Vs. The Branch Manager, Union Bank of India, Th ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-04-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to provide with an educational loan application form to the Petitioner and thereafter to consider and sanction the educational loan to pursue Petitioner's MBA Degree(2 years course) at Sambharam Institute of Technology, Bangalore, under the Educational Loan Scheme as approved by the Reserve Bank of India by considering the Petitioner's representation dated 27.6.2016.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondent. 4. According to the Petitioner, his father originally belong to the State of Rajasthan. However, his parents came down to Thoothukujdi before 35 years and get settled there and hence, they had become permanent residence of Thoothukudi District. His father was initially dealing with the business of Match Sticks and ...
S. Seeni Vs. The Principal Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Rural ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-04-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to regularise the services of the petitioner in Sedapatti Panchayat Union as full time Masalgi with all attendant and consequential, monetary and service benefits.) When the matter is taken-up for hearing, Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan, learned Special Government Pleader produced an order made in Na.Ka.No.29260/2016/Uoo.Va.11 dated 15.07.2016 rejecting the request made by the petitioner in this Writ Petition. At this juncture, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty to challenge the order of dated 15.07.2016. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. In view of the above, this Writ Petition stands dismissed granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 15.07.2016 passed by the respondents. No costs....
T. Rajan Vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer (main), Thanjavur Distr ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-04-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the respondent in TIN No.33464163709/2014-2015 dated 01.06.2016 and quash the same, as illegal, arbitrary and against the provisions of the Act.) 1. The petitioner challenges the order of the respondent dated 01.06.2016 on the ground that the respondent has no jurisdiction to revise the assessment on the basis of the Web-report obtained behind the back of the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondent being a quasi-judicial authority ought not to have relied on the documents taken from the Web-report to fasten the liability on the petitioner, without assigning any valid reason. He further submitted that it is the bounden duty of the respondent to establish that the petitioner had effected the purchases as alleged by the respondent. Therefore, the present impugned order is liable to be interfered with by this...
Kesavan Vs. T.G.R. Ananthapadmanaban
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-04-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed Under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC praying to review the order dated 28.01.2015 passed in CRP (NPD) (MD) No.1393 of 2002.) 1. The tenant in the Rent Control Proceedings is the review petitioner. Eviction proceedings was initiated by the respondent on the ground of willful default and owner's occupation. It was a batch of rent control petitions filed against various tenants by the landlord. The review petitioner had remained exparte before the Rent Controller. The landlord had marked documents in respect of his petition from Exs.P1 to P144. Considering the documents, the eviction petition was allowed. Aggrieved, an appeal was preferred by the review petitioner, which also confirmed the order of eviction. 2. Aggrieved by the same, C.R.P (NPD) (MD) No.1393 of 2002 was filed. In the revision also, detailed order was passed, considering the submissions made by both the counsels. Though the tenant had denied the title of the landlord and contended that the property belonged to...
Shanmugam and Others Vs. State rep by Inspector of Police, Avinashipal ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-04-2016
(Prayer:Appeal filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment passed by the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruppur in S.C.No.37 of 2015 dated 21.12.2015.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellants are accused 1 to 9 in S.C.No.37 of 2015 on the file of the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruppur. The accused 1 to 4 stood charged for offences under Sections 147, 148 and 302 r/w 149 I.P.C. and the accused 5 to 9 stood charged for offences under Sections 147 and 302 r/w 149 I.P.C. By judgment dated 21.12.2015, the trial Court convicted these appellants for various charges and accordingly sentenced them as detailed below: ad>Rank of theAccusedPenal provision(s) under which convictedSentenceA1 to A4302 of IPCImprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- each and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three months.A1 to A4148 of IPCSimple imprisonment for six months.A5 to A9302 r/w 149 of IPCImprisonment for life...
The General Manager, The Cannannore Spinning and Weaving Mills, A unit ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-04-2016
(Prayer in W.A.No.178 of 2012: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the common order dated 1.2.2011 passed in W.P.No.13655 of 2008.) Common Judgment: A. Selvam, J. 1. These Writ Appeals have been directed against the common order dated 1.2.2011 passed in W.P.Nos.13655/2008, 25050/2009 and 25051 of 2009 by the learned Single Judge of this Court. 2. The appellant herein, as petitioner, has filed W.P.No.13655 of 2008 on the file of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order dated 7.5.2008 passed in P.G.A.No.9 of 2007 by the first respondent. Likewise, W.P.No.25050 of 2009 has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order dated 15.12.2005 passed in P.G.A.NO.3/2005/A1 by the second respondent. Likewise, W.P.No.25051 of 2009 has also been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order dated 15.12.2005 passed in P.G.A.No.4/2005/A1 by the second respondent...
Vellaisamy Vs. The District Collector, Dindigul District and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-04-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus to direct the 2nd respondent to issue patta to the petitioner with regard to lands in S.No.311/1A to an extent of 2 cents situated at Pudur Village, Natham Taluk, Dindigul District based on the petitioner's representation dated 13.07.2016.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the respondents. 4. According to the petitioner, the lands in Pudur Village in Sy.No.311/1A is having an extent of 1 acres and 2 cents, wherein, a small portion of 2 cents of land was occupied by him and he is in enjoyment of the same for more than 30 years by running a small petty shop, small tea stall and run his family from and out of the said source of income. 5. The plea of the petitioner is that he was given a licence to run the tea shop, for which he is paying tax to the Panchayat till date without fail....
D. Thanislas Vs. The Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-04-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 23.03.2015 to settle the pending payment of money along with the interest to the petitioner for the urgent repair works completed by the petitioner in L.S.0/400 in Thiurparappu Left Bank Canal during the month of December 2010.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the respondents. 4. According to the petitioner, near Thiruparappu, there is a canal situated in the name of 'Thiruparapu Left Bank Canal (TLBC) and during the year 2008 and 2010, there was a heavy rain fall in Thiruparapu area, which caused damage to TLBC. Thereafter, based on request and permission granted by the respondents, he entered into the repair works of TLBC and completed the said work immediately by spending a sum of Rs.31,90,000/-. Till...
- ‹ Prev
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- Next ›
- Last »