Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

S. Seeni Vs. The Principal Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Chennai and Others

S. Seeni vs The Principal Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Chennai and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Aug 04, 2016
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1189264

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
W.P(MD).No. 13790 of 2016 & M.P.(MD).Nos. 1 & 2 of 2012
Subject
Constitution

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Constitution

Key legal issue
Constitution

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S. Seeni

Respondent

The Principal Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Chennai and Others

Excerpt

(prayer: writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india for the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to regularise the services of the petitioner in sedapatti panchayat union as full time masalgi with all attendant and consequential, monetary and service benefits.) when the matter is taken-up for hearing, mr.vr.shanmuganathan, learned special government pleader produced an order made in na.ka.no.29260/2016/uoo.va.11 dated 15.07.2016 rejecting the request made by the petitioner in this writ petition. at this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to challenge the order of dated 15.07.2016. he has also made an endorsement to that effect. in view of the above, this writ petition stands dismissed granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 15.07.2016 passed by the respondents. no costs.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to regularise the services of the petitioner in Sedapatti Panchayat Union as full time Masalgi with all attendant and consequential, monetary and service benefits.)

When the matter is taken-up for hearing, Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan, learned Special Government Pleader produced an order made in Na.Ka.No.29260/2016/Uoo.Va.11 dated 15.07.2016 rejecting the request made by the petitioner in this Writ Petition. At this juncture, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty to challenge the order of dated 15.07.2016. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

In view of the above, this Writ Petition stands dismissed granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 15.07.2016 passed by the respondents. No costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial