Chennai Court August 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K. Thiagarajan and Others Vs. The Managing Director, The Tamil Nadu St ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-11-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay the retirement benefits with interest to the petitioner in view of the representation dated 21.06.2016.) 1. The petitioner was an employee of the respondents Transport Corporation. Seeking his retirement benefits, he has filed the present Writ Petition. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the issue is covered by a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, dated 12.06.2015. He has further submitted that the respondents would consider the request of the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by the Honourable Division Bench. 3. For ready reference, the judgment, dated 12.06.2015, passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, is extracted hereunder: "The learned Additional Advocate General submit...
P. Gnanasekaran Vs. State Express Transport Corporation (Tamil Nadu) L ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-11-2016
(1. Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant 5th Review Benefits and to Revise the Petitioner pay in the post of Senior Checking Inspector with retrospective effect from 01.09.2010 in term of Government order in G.O.Ms.No.61 Transport (C) Department dated 30.04.2015 and as per the 12(3) settlement dated 22.01.2011 and further directing the Respondents to pay the difference in salary and to pay difference in Retirement Benefits including difference amount in monthly pension Gratuity, Commuted value of pension, leave salary and all other attendant benefits payable to the petitioner from 01.09.2010 to 30.06.2011 together with interest at the rate of 18% per annum.) 1. The petitioner was an employee of the respondents Transport Corporation. Seeking his benefits, he has filed the present Writ Petition. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondents have not given the ben...
Dr. (Mrs).Irfana Hameed Vs. The General Manager Department of Telecomm ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-11-2016
(Prayer: Original Side Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent read with Order XXXVI Rule 1 of Original Side Rules, to set aside the Judgment and Decree, dated 26.06.2008 made in Tr.O.P.No.451 of 2006 on the file of this Court.) P. Kalaiyarasan, J. This Original Side Appeal is directed against the order of the learned single Judge, dated 26.06.2008 in Tr.O.P.No.451 of 2006, dismissing the petition filed under Section 34(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. 2. The brief facts leading to the filing of this Original Side Appeal are : (i) The appellant, a medical practitioner was allotted Telephone No.8262499 and the same was changed to 8253821 and thereafter 8553469. The Department made a claim from the appellant for Rs.2,25,120/- through Bill, dated 15.06.1994, claiming short claim of LCC in Bill, dated 07.10.1990 and 07.12.1990. The appellant received it on 01.07.1994 and on the same day, she sent a letter requesting the Department for particulars for the claim. Since ...
Kumar @ Button Kumar Vs. State represented by Inspector of Police, Kri ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-11-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482, Cr.P.C. to direct the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Krishnagiri in S.C. No.247 of 2007 and S.C. No.249 of 2007 order dated 30.01.2009 to all the petitioner to serve his term concurrently.) 1. This Criminal Original Petition is filed for a direction to the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Krishnagiri, to allow the petitioner to serve the terms awarded by judgments dated 30.01.2009 in S.C. Nos.247 and 249 of 2007, concurrently. 2. Heard Mr. Akhil Akbar Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.C.Emalias, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State. 3. A case in Kavaripattinam P.S. Crime No.111 of 2007 was registered by the respondent police in respect of a robbery that had taken place on 28/29.01.2007 between 21.00 hours and 01.00 hours in the house of one Senthil Kumar and after completing the investigation, Kavaripattinam Police filed a final report in P.R.C. No.29/2007 before the Judicial ...
The Destitute Charitable Trust Rep by its Managing Trustee Vs. The Cha ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-11-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for all the concerned records pertaining to the passing of the order dated 19.05.2015 in proceedings No.Lr-No.137/2015 on the file of the respondent and quash the same.) 1. The petitioner trust, aggrieved by the order of the respondent dated 19.05.2015, in and by which, it was directed to surrender all the nine abandoned children before them with relevant documents on 04.06.2015, has filed this writ petition. 2. The Managing Trustee of the petitioner Trust has sworn to the affidavit in support of the writ petition stating among other things that the Trust came to be established as per the Trust Deed dated 23.06.2006 and at present, ten girl children are being cared and maintained by them. The petitioner Trust submitted a representation dated 24.07.2006 to the District Collector of Kancheepuram District praying for recognition of the Trust as per the provision...
S. Muthaiyan and Others Vs. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Tr ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-11-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to settle the petitioner's retirement benefits including Gratuity, Leave Salary, Commutation, SSS and all other attendant benefits with interest at the rate of 18% per annum within the time limit that may be fixed by this Court.) 1. The petitioner was an employee of the respondents Transport Corporation. Seeking his retirement benefits, he has filed the present Writ Petition. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the issue is covered by a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, dated 12.06.2015. He has further submitted that the respondents would consider the request of the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by the Honourable Division Bench. 3. For ready reference, the judgment, dated 12.06.2015, passed by the Hon'ble Divi...
Kumar Vs. State by, The Sub-Inspector of Police, Salem
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-11-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to call for the records in C.A.No.60 of 2012 on the file of the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Salem, and set aside the judgment dated 17.01.2013 confirming the judgment and sentence passed in C.C.No.143 of 2011 by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Salem, by allowing this revision.) 1. This criminal revision case is directed against the judgment dated 17.01.2013 passed by the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Salem, in Crl.A.No.60 of 2012 and confirming the judgment passed in C.C.No.143 of 2011 by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Salem, on 12.06.2012. 2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:- In this case, on the complaint given by one Thilakavathi/P.W.1, F.I.R. was registered in Crime No.330 of 2011 for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 447 and 427 against A.1, A.2 and A.4 and under Sections 147, 148, 447, 354, 32...
V. Mani Vs. The Regional Transport Officer, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari Dis ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-11-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 25.07.2016 to receive the road tax amount and release the tractor bearing registration No.TN 74 P 2691.) 1. This Writ Petition is filed, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 25.07.2016, to receive the road tax amount and release the tractor bearing registration No.TN-74 P-2691. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that since the petitioner failed to pay dues to a private finance company, the vehicle in question was seized by the respondents and therefore, he could not pay the road tax. However, he is ready to pay the road tax as on date and after making such payment, the vehicle in question may be released by the respondent. 3. Mr.T.R.Janarthanam, learned Additional Government Pleader, after taking notice for the respo...
G. Uma Maheswari Vs. The Secretary to Government, Higher Education (F2 ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-11-2016
(Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to award 15 marks for the petitioner for the experience of the petitioner in the light of the notification of the 2nd respondent in Advertisement No.4/2013, dated 28.05.2013 and as per the orders in W.P.(MD)No.2274 and 2275 of 2014, dated 11.02.2014 and G.O.Ms.No.502 of the 1st respondent, dated 31.12.2015 and consequently direct the petitioners to appoint the petitioner as Assistant Professor in Zoology in any one of the government colleges with all monetary and attendance benefits on par with other eligible candidates.) This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner for issuing a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to award 15 marks to the petitioner for her teaching experience as per the notification of the second respondent Board, dated 28.05.2013 and as per G.O.Ms.No.502, Higher Education (F2) Department, dated 31.12.2015 and consequent...
V. Mohan Vs. State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Thanjavur and Other ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-11-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C., against the order passed in C.R.M.P.No.394 of 2015 in S.C.No.238 of 2015, on the file of the Additional Assistant Sessions Judge, Thanjavur, dated 04.03.2016.) 1. Mohan, the defacto complainant dissatisfied with the decision of the learned Additional Assistant Sessions Judge, Thanjavur, dismissing his petition in CR.MP.No.394 of 2015 filed in S.C.No.238 of 2015, under Section 173 Cr.P.C., for further investigation. 2. Based on the complaint of the said Mohan, the Thanjavur East Police Station, registered a case in Crime No.575 of 2013, for offences under Sections 368, 386 and 506(ii) IPC. The Investigation Officer conducted the investigation, concluded it, filed final report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C., before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Thanjavur, for offences under Sections 368, 386 and 506(ii) IPC. The learned Magistrate took cognizance thereon in PRC.No.38/2014. Thereafter, the Magistrate su...
- ‹ Prev
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- Next ›
- Last »